Charlie Strong

[TheBullies]

I agree with some of the thoughts here that reasonable efforts to find employment does not equal reasonable efforts to maximize payments for offered employment.

[TheBullies]

I don't think smazza is licensed in Florida, but there are a few attorneys on this board that are...

[MMW]

1 minute ago, George Jenkins said:

I don't see anything that would require him to seek a contract at full market value. Technically, minimizing Texas's payments by $100 is still minimizing. Our wishful interpretation of this contraction is part of what makes him so appealing as a coach.

I say we go for the back-loaded deal and throw in smazza for legal representation when Texas goes after him.

I hear smazza charges extra for punctuation and capital letters.

[Bulls On Parade]

Need an attorney?

[Orlando Bull]

the hearings would be in texas I suspect.

[Gismo]

4 minutes ago, TheBullies said:

Negative... but the cornerstone of all contracts is the intent of the parties when they entered the contract... unfortunately.... that would be an issue litigated.

Well we know Texas always has the intention of screwing their partners. Look at the big 12 and ESPN, screwed them both. 

Edited December 9, 2016 by Gismo

[ajusf16]

5 minutes ago, BDYZR said:

Who decides what's reasonable? Highest? Every effort?

Very vague clause. 

[TheBullies]

1 minute ago, Orlando Bull said:

the hearings would be in texas I suspect.

You are correct. Paragraph 8.c.

[bulls phanatic]

http://www.floridafootballinsiders.com/usf-bulls/charlie-strong-still-front-runner-usf-can-afford-pay/

[Who'sYourData?]

6 minutes ago, Azmodi said:

That does not specify what teams he can or can't work for which is what I was referring to.

A non-compete refers to any similar job, not necessarily specific employers.