TheBullies Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 95 Content Count: 2,461 Reputation: 86 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/14/2006 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Either way, if UT is trying to say USF can't offer a backloaded deal, then USF will just have to pay market value every year. Strong might not like that, because the "load" is taken off the back. And I'm talkin about $$$. In case you were wondering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajusf16 Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 110 Content Count: 2,558 Reputation: 86 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/30/2009 Share Posted December 9, 2016 3 minutes ago, TheUpperHand said: Depends whether or not Charlie wants to see the dessert menu. It's catered. Foods there. Just need to eat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gismo Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 417 Content Count: 9,688 Reputation: 1,237 Days Won: 8 Joined: 09/24/2009 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Texas is the reason USF can't have nice things. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaisingFenix Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 433 Reputation: 64 Days Won: 1 Joined: 04/13/2012 Share Posted December 9, 2016 1 minute ago, Orlando Bull said: To an extent yes, but, he can also sit at home doing nothing and they have to pay him. Even under a back-loaded contract, they get out of some of that liability. Again, he could just say... you know what... I will take 2 years off and Texas has to pay him every dime. Anyone hiring Strong is a favor to them. True, and if that is what's being negotiated, that would be the leverage we have. Texas wouldn't be able to just force our offer up, because at some point we could just walk away from the table and leave them holding the bag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls Are We Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 217 Content Count: 2,495 Reputation: 192 Days Won: 1 Joined: 11/23/2003 Share Posted December 9, 2016 2 minutes ago, Orlando Bull said: To an extent yes, but, he can also sit at home doing nothing and they have to pay him. Even under a back-loaded contract, they get out of some of that liability. Again, he could just say... you know what... I will take 2 years off and Texas has to pay him every dime. Anyone hiring Strong is a favor to them. Tejas doesn't have to pay him ****. They can tie it up in court for years and not pay him anything if they wan't to be ***** about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodi Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 12 Content Count: 3,233 Reputation: 1,169 Days Won: 8 Joined: 10/17/2013 Share Posted December 9, 2016 4 minutes ago, Who'sYourData? said: Absolutely they can. We will give you $10.7 million as a buy out over three years, subject to negotiation if you take another ncaa coaching job. Very simple language to include in his original contract with Texas. The devil is in the details however, they terminated him. That being said, the manor in which he is being paid already addresses further employment. As to whom he may be employed by, they can not restrict. Had he self terminated then a No-Compete-Clause would be binding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheUpperHand Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 44 Content Count: 2,035 Reputation: 1,410 Days Won: 20 Joined: 06/29/2007 Share Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) nm Edited December 9, 2016 by TheUpperHand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyGator Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 37 Content Count: 821 Reputation: 20 Days Won: 2 Joined: 12/02/2005 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Someone need to photoshop this pic with green instead of orange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted December 9, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted December 9, 2016 1 minute ago, Azmodi said: The devil is in the details however, they terminated him. That being said, the manor in which he is being paid already addresses further employment. As to whom he may be employed by, they can not restrict. Had he self terminated then a No-Compete-Clause would be binding. Sure they can. If you want the buyout, there are stipulations. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.T. Posted December 9, 2016 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 4,751 Content Count: 37,676 Reputation: 2,367 Days Won: 29 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted December 9, 2016 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now