theman123 Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 411 Content Count: 5,591 Reputation: 204 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/10/2006 Share Posted October 16, 2015 I'm curious to see the response, but expect it to go one way. At first thought, I would say yes. I immediately think to Dunkley, who was allowed back. But, I'm curious to see how the legal process plays out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted October 16, 2015 (Assuming this is true) No, it was extremely reckless and someone could have gotten hurt or killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
206BULL Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 66 Content Count: 4,778 Reputation: 901 Days Won: 6 Joined: 08/30/2009 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Sure they deserve a second chance; just not at USF. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hbryan Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 121 Content Count: 4,259 Reputation: 39 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/16/2006 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Absolutely not, they're too stupid to be in college. They had a car, could have driven in the woods but instead shot at a building, on campus, from a parking garage? That kind of lawless stupidity cannot be tolerated. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 56 Content Count: 4,430 Reputation: 711 Days Won: 19 Joined: 03/16/2013 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Of course! It must clear legal routes first, until then - suspension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrush33 Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 3,806 Reputation: 793 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2008 Share Posted October 16, 2015 I guess I dont know all the facts. However if they shot at a building with people on the other side who could have been shot then I say see you later. I think at this time Lamar did not fire the weapon but was trying to protect Knox so I say he may salvageable. Wasn't there a similar situation with Kiebler (I dont remember his name) a few years ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Yeah, I'm with Bullrush on whether or not everything is known, but it looks like tragically awful judgment. Given the specific advice CWT gave to the players after the win, it looks even stupider. Doubt they get cleared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls1181 Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 170 Content Count: 5,722 Reputation: 366 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/03/2011 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Next! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 35 Content Count: 487 Reputation: 54 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/30/2006 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Yes. All that matters is winning. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sellular1 Posted October 16, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 196 Content Count: 6,619 Reputation: 1,785 Days Won: 51 Joined: 07/04/2008 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Sure they deserve a second chance; just not at USF.exactly. Flush the toilet on those turds 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now