Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand? Let's see. The SEC Network is brand new and this was the first game ever broadcast. You don't think someone made a mistake and then corrected it? Or is there some rule in the universe that once you have started watching a game the provider must let you finish the game even if you don't have rights to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 555 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted August 29, 2014 (edited) WTF? Can the AAC approve ours Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't. SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Its black on black so technically its not visible. That is the loop hole. If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well. The fake names can't be visible. One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up? Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole. It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in. http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ... I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April. No offense but ....... It was from April per the SEC Network Now TV show. And ShadowBull, who do you think owns the SEC Network? Its an ESPN network devoted to the SEC. And I have WatchESPN AND SEC Network access through Dish, and the game has been PULLED. Edited August 29, 2014 by slick1ru2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 WTF? Can the AAC approve ours Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't. SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Its black on black so technically its not visible. That is the loop hole. If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well. The fake names can't be visible. One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up? Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole. It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in. http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ... I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April. No offense but ....... Um, from somewhere other than this thread, if that's what you are thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 555 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Watching this game on the TV replay and the announcers are making excuses for Vandy because of the weather delay, smh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted August 29, 2014 WTF? Can the AAC approve ours Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't. SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS. Its black on black so technically its not visible. That is the loop hole. If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well. The fake names can't be visible. One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up? Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole. It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in. http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ... I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April. No offense but ....... It was from April per the SEC Network Now TV show. And ShadowBull, who do you think owns the SEC Network? Its an ESPN network devoted to the SEC. And I have WatchESPN AND SEC Network access through Dish, and the game has been PULLED. The SEC owns the SEC Network, they have a contract with ESPN to produce it. The game was PULLED because you were not supposed to have access. How difficult is this to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPR Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 3,042 Reputation: 279 Days Won: 10 Joined: 03/09/2010 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Watching this game on the TV replay and the announcers are making excuses for Vandy because of the weather delay, smh. Well, it is the SEC Network, so I'm guessing they are going to be homers on that channel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 555 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted August 29, 2014 The SEC Network, being owned by ESPN... http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/sec/2014/05/31/sec-network-espn-comcast-direct-tv/9812745/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 555 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I have the SEC Network, I have access to their replays. It's been pulled and the AAC is looking into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted August 29, 2014 You da man, slick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted August 29, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 555 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted August 29, 2014 (edited) The Texas AM/ South Carolina SkyCam Feed is available on WatchESPN with an SEC/ESPN Network Logo. BTW, the SkyCam feed for the Boise St/Miss game is available too. Guess we'll see what happens when the AAC contacts them. Pulling losses to non-P5 needs to be nipped in the bud. Edited August 29, 2014 by slick1ru2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now