WoolyBully Posted April 22, 2013 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 194 Content Count: 6,788 Reputation: 865 Days Won: 3 Joined: 08/01/2000 Share Posted April 22, 2013 ...Believe what you will Wooly. I will take the opposite approach and say that this team goes bowling this year. Nothing wrong with that, and if it does happen, as 6-6 is all it takes to go bowling, I will be pleasantly surprised. And should that happen, it would be the benchmark for success going forward, under the CWT tenure. But if it doesn't happen...it won't be totally unexpected, for a number of reasons. And now that we've had a chance to stretch our legs, let's get back on the road, shall we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELdaBull Posted April 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 86 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted April 22, 2013 Looks good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted April 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted April 22, 2013 Bout time USF signs some REAL teams... still holding out hope for a USF series against Clemson, UGA. South Carolina, LSU, etc. 2017 - Michigan State, Wisconsin* 2016 - Indiana 2015 - Indiana, Maryland* 2014 - Maryland*, NC State, Wisconsin* 2013 - Miami, Michigan State 2012 - FSU, Miami 2011 - Notre Dame, Miami 2010 - Florida, Miami 2009 - FSU, Miami 2008 - Kansas, NC State 2007 - Auburn 2006 - Kansas *Just signed Which of these are not, "real" teams? It has been years since any of those games were inked. The only scheduling news released in the last 4 years or so have been games with absolutely zero excitability. It's not to say that USF hasn't signed up for a real game, it's just been an exhausting wait. And to answer your questions, Indiana is a borderline real team at best. We caught Kansas at a good time, but that was luck. They're (Kansas) really no juice to a schedule at this point. About the same can be said for Maryland, but I'm excited to play them. I hate to disagree, Mr Martin, but four of those games were inked within the last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Martin Posted April 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 148 Content Count: 8,044 Reputation: 228 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/23/2005 Share Posted April 22, 2013 Bout time USF signs some REAL teams... still holding out hope for a USF series against Clemson, UGA. South Carolina, LSU, etc. 2017 - Michigan State, Wisconsin* 2016 - Indiana 2015 - Indiana, Maryland* 2014 - Maryland*, NC State, Wisconsin* 2013 - Miami, Michigan State 2012 - FSU, Miami 2011 - Notre Dame, Miami 2010 - Florida, Miami 2009 - FSU, Miami 2008 - Kansas, NC State 2007 - Auburn 2006 - Kansas *Just signed Which of these are not, "real" teams? It has been years since any of those games were inked. The only scheduling news released in the last 4 years or so have been games with absolutely zero excitability. It's not to say that USF hasn't signed up for a real game, it's just been an exhausting wait. And to answer your questions, Indiana is a borderline real team at best. We caught Kansas at a good time, but that was luck. They're (Kansas) really no juice to a schedule at this point. About the same can be said for Maryland, but I'm excited to play them. I hate to disagree, Mr Martin, but four of those games were inked within the last week. Obviously before those 4 games were inked. It had been a long wait for some good games to get added to the schedule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted April 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted April 22, 2013 Bout time USF signs some REAL teams... still holding out hope for a USF series against Clemson, UGA. South Carolina, LSU, etc. 2017 - Michigan State, Wisconsin* 2016 - Indiana 2015 - Indiana, Maryland* 2014 - Maryland*, NC State, Wisconsin* 2013 - Miami, Michigan State 2012 - FSU, Miami 2011 - Notre Dame, Miami 2010 - Florida, Miami 2009 - FSU, Miami 2008 - Kansas, NC State 2007 - Auburn 2006 - Kansas *Just signed Which of these are not, "real" teams? It has been years since any of those games were inked. The only scheduling news released in the last 4 years or so have been games with absolutely zero excitability. It's not to say that USF hasn't signed up for a real game, it's just been an exhausting wait. And to answer your questions, Indiana is a borderline real team at best. We caught Kansas at a good time, but that was luck. They're (Kansas) really no juice to a schedule at this point. About the same can be said for Maryland, but I'm excited to play them. I hate to disagree, Mr Martin, but four of those games were inked within the last week. Obviously before those 4 games were inked. It had been a long wait for some good games to get added to the schedule. And what impact did that have on our schedule through 2017? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted April 22, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted April 22, 2013 It may have been a long wait between these games, but really does that matter? The fact is it got done. Just realize you may not hear about 2018 and forward until 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zarnozdabull Posted April 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 95 Content Count: 2,433 Reputation: 883 Days Won: 3 Joined: 06/16/2009 Share Posted April 24, 2013 (edited) Just had a thought, with Wisconsin, Sparty, Indiana, and Maryland now on the schedule... Maybe we're being auditioned for the B1G?!?!?!?! Knowing this, and the fact that Judy Genshaft graduated from Wisconsin and held administrative positions at the Ohio State University, it may not be such a crazy thought... We definitely at least need to win our conference title once though. B1G is no joke of a power conference. Edited April 24, 2013 by zarnozdabull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted April 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'd certainly rather be in the B1G than in the B12. But I really had my heart set on the ACC. Oh well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELdaBull Posted April 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 86 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'd certainly rather be in the B1G than in the B12. But I really had my heart set on the ACC. Oh well... We are in the AAC!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Martin Posted April 24, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 148 Content Count: 8,044 Reputation: 228 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/23/2005 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'd certainly rather be in the B1G than in the B12. But I really had my heart set on the ACC. Oh well... We are in the AAC!!!!!!! Please stop reminding us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now