Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

USF signs games with Wisconsin and Maryland


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Bull Backers
  • Topic Count:  194
  • Content Count:  6,788
  • Reputation:   865
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  08/01/2000

...Believe what you will Wooly. I will take the opposite approach and say that this team goes bowling this year.

 

Nothing wrong with that, and if it does happen, as 6-6 is all it takes to go bowling, I will be pleasantly surprised. And should that

happen, it would be the benchmark for success going forward, under the CWT tenure. But if it doesn't happen...it won't be 

totally unexpected, for a number of reasons.

 

And now that we've had a chance to stretch our legs, let's get back on the road, shall we? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  86
  • Content Count:  17,061
  • Reputation:   1,429
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  09/15/2005

Looks good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

 

 

Bout time USF signs some REAL teams... still holding out hope for a USF series against Clemson, UGA. South Carolina, LSU, etc.

 

2017 - Michigan State, Wisconsin*

2016 - Indiana

2015 - Indiana, Maryland*

2014 - Maryland*, NC State, Wisconsin*

2013 - Miami, Michigan State

2012 - FSU, Miami

2011 - Notre Dame, Miami

2010 - Florida, Miami

2009 - FSU, Miami

2008 - Kansas, NC State

2007 - Auburn

2006 - Kansas

 

*Just signed

 

Which of these are not, "real" teams?

 

 

It has been years since any of those games were inked.  The only scheduling news released in the last 4 years or so have been games with absolutely zero excitability.  It's not to say that USF hasn't signed up for a real game, it's just been an exhausting wait.  

 

And to answer your questions, Indiana is a borderline real team at best.  We caught Kansas at a good time, but that was luck.  They're (Kansas) really no juice to a schedule at this point.  About the same can be said for Maryland, but I'm excited to play them.

 

 

I hate to disagree, Mr Martin, but four of those games were inked within the last week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  148
  • Content Count:  8,044
  • Reputation:   228
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  12/23/2005

 

 

 

Bout time USF signs some REAL teams... still holding out hope for a USF series against Clemson, UGA. South Carolina, LSU, etc.

 

2017 - Michigan State, Wisconsin*

2016 - Indiana

2015 - Indiana, Maryland*

2014 - Maryland*, NC State, Wisconsin*

2013 - Miami, Michigan State

2012 - FSU, Miami

2011 - Notre Dame, Miami

2010 - Florida, Miami

2009 - FSU, Miami

2008 - Kansas, NC State

2007 - Auburn

2006 - Kansas

 

*Just signed

 

Which of these are not, "real" teams?

 

 

It has been years since any of those games were inked.  The only scheduling news released in the last 4 years or so have been games with absolutely zero excitability.  It's not to say that USF hasn't signed up for a real game, it's just been an exhausting wait.  

 

And to answer your questions, Indiana is a borderline real team at best.  We caught Kansas at a good time, but that was luck.  They're (Kansas) really no juice to a schedule at this point.  About the same can be said for Maryland, but I'm excited to play them.

 

 

I hate to disagree, Mr Martin, but four of those games were inked within the last week.  

 

 

:slapmax:

 

Obviously before those 4 games were inked.  It had been a long wait for some good games to get added to the schedule.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

 

 

 

 

Bout time USF signs some REAL teams... still holding out hope for a USF series against Clemson, UGA. South Carolina, LSU, etc.

 

2017 - Michigan State, Wisconsin*

2016 - Indiana

2015 - Indiana, Maryland*

2014 - Maryland*, NC State, Wisconsin*

2013 - Miami, Michigan State

2012 - FSU, Miami

2011 - Notre Dame, Miami

2010 - Florida, Miami

2009 - FSU, Miami

2008 - Kansas, NC State

2007 - Auburn

2006 - Kansas

 

*Just signed

 

Which of these are not, "real" teams?

 

 

It has been years since any of those games were inked.  The only scheduling news released in the last 4 years or so have been games with absolutely zero excitability.  It's not to say that USF hasn't signed up for a real game, it's just been an exhausting wait.  

 

And to answer your questions, Indiana is a borderline real team at best.  We caught Kansas at a good time, but that was luck.  They're (Kansas) really no juice to a schedule at this point.  About the same can be said for Maryland, but I'm excited to play them.

 

 

I hate to disagree, Mr Martin, but four of those games were inked within the last week.  

 

 

:slapmax:

 

Obviously before those 4 games were inked.  It had been a long wait for some good games to get added to the schedule.  

 

 

And what impact did that have on our schedule through 2017?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

It may have been a long wait between these games, but really does that matter?  The fact is it got done.  Just realize you may not hear about 2018 and forward until 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  95
  • Content Count:  2,433
  • Reputation:   883
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/16/2009

Just had a thought, with Wisconsin, Sparty, Indiana, and Maryland now on the schedule...

 

Maybe we're being auditioned for the B1G?!?!?!?!

 

Knowing this, and the fact that Judy Genshaft graduated from Wisconsin and held administrative positions at the Ohio State University, it may not be such a crazy thought...

We definitely at least need to win our conference title once though.

B1G is no joke of a power conference.

Edited by zarnozdabull
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

I'd certainly rather be in the B1G than in the B12.

 

But I really had my heart set on the ACC. Oh well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  86
  • Content Count:  17,061
  • Reputation:   1,429
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  09/15/2005

I'd certainly rather be in the B1G than in the B12.

But I really had my heart set on the ACC. Oh well...

We are in the AAC!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  148
  • Content Count:  8,044
  • Reputation:   228
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  12/23/2005

 

I'd certainly rather be in the B1G than in the B12.

But I really had my heart set on the ACC. Oh well...

We are in the AAC!!!!!!!

 

 

Please stop reminding us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.