Bull-by-Marriage Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 355 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted March 13, 2013 We can control 1 thing and 1 thing only. Just win baby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mviusa Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 5 Content Count: 751 Reputation: 17 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/23/2012 Share Posted March 13, 2013 We can control 1 thing and 1 thing only. Just win baby! "We" control nada, zip, zillch.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsFanInTX Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted March 13, 2013 The Champs, Belk, and Pinstripe haven't gone anywhere yet. The Pinstripe is likely gone, but who cares about that bowl. I am hoping that if A12 offers their #1, it will be more attractive than the B12 or B10 #8 or 9. Remember, all of their top bowls are already spoken for, so the best they can do is offer a very low pick. If they move the Champs or Belk up their bowl lineups, which bowls are being eliminated or moved down. Whatever those bowls are might be available. In theory, when one door closes, another one opens. At a certain point being the #8 or 9 pick in a so called power conf. is not more attractive. They can't just add bowls without others being deleted or moved down the chain. Do you think the other bowls are going to be happy about being moved down to make room form Champs/Belk/Pinstripe. Again if you look at the so called "power conferences" every single one of their bowls is already spoken for all the way down to the #8 or 9 slot. So I ask again, which bowl is being deleted from their lineups or being moved down. It's either that or they make any new bowls Their #10 pick. Which is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knightfan41 Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 9 Content Count: 83 Reputation: 26 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/21/2003 Share Posted March 13, 2013 What you see here is the widening of the gap between the haves and the have-nots. College football is all about the $$ now and it is only getting worse. It is stricly TV revenue generated, Winning will have little to do with it. Thus they will have #7 SEC team before a #1 undefeated A12 team. You don't see any of the big conferences jumping to grab Boise State do you? They are the poster child for non-AQ success, but they are on the outside looking in just like us. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rizman Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 2,332 Content Count: 21,305 Reputation: 911 Days Won: 10 Joined: 01/02/2007 Share Posted March 13, 2013 What about the toilet bowl? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South_Florida_Flip Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 99 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted March 13, 2013 What about the toilet bowl? We play there on 11/29 this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 197 Content Count: 10,251 Reputation: 270 Days Won: 14 Joined: 08/16/2005 Author Share Posted March 13, 2013 The Champs, Belk, and Pinstripe haven't gone anywhere yet. The Pinstripe is likely gone, but who cares about that bowl. I am hoping that if A12 offers their #1, it will be more attractive than the B12 or B10 #8 or 9. Remember, all of their top bowls are already spoken for, so the best they can do is offer a very low pick. If they move the Champs or Belk up their bowl lineups, which bowls are being eliminated or moved down. Whatever those bowls are might be available. In theory, when one door closes, another one opens. At a certain point being the #8 or 9 pick in a so called power conf. is not more attractive. They can't just add bowls without others being deleted or moved down the chain. Do you think the other bowls are going to be happy about being moved down to make room form Champs/Belk/Pinstripe. Again if you look at the so called "power conferences" every single one of their bowls is already spoken for all the way down to the #8 or 9 slot. So I ask again, which bowl is being deleted from their lineups or being moved down. It's either that or they make any new bowls Their #10 pick. Which is it. Belk Bowl is likely done - http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/jeremy-fowler/21826498 If you believe McMurphy the Russel Athletic is too. What you're removing is that these power conferences have more teams. Which means more tie ins. And by all accounts (reports) they're okay dropping the Big East Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltoBull Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 35 Content Count: 490 Reputation: 13 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/19/2006 Share Posted March 13, 2013 We can control 1 thing and 1 thing only. Just win baby! "We" control nada, zip, zillch.. What you see here is the widening of the gap between the haves and the have-nots. College football is all about the $$ now and it is only getting worse. It is stricly TV revenue generated, Winning will have little to do with it. Thus they will have #7 SEC team before a #1 undefeated A12 team. You don't see any of the big conferences jumping to grab Boise State do you? They are the poster child for non-AQ success, but they are on the outside looking in just like us. Exactly. If the Yet-To-Be-Named Conference is trying to separate itself from the rest of the Gang of Five, why aren't we on the phone with the MWC? We need to be trying to get them into the New Orleans and Beef O' Brady's Bowls. Maybe a bowl for them to travel to in LA or FL and one for one of our teams to travel to on the West Coast? Maybe the MWC would like to get out of the cost and burden of traveling to the Hawaii Bowl? They've got a better bowl line-up then us now, but for how long? If we don't end up doing our own thing with the Go5 conferences, I think once we are effectively shut out of the other bowls, we really need to work on setting up our #2-3 playing MWC and Indys and then our only our other teams against C-USA and Sun Belt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted March 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Pathetic line up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemcp88 Posted March 14, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 14 Content Count: 2,653 Reputation: 41 Days Won: 2 Joined: 07/24/2008 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Terrible line up if this were to happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now