Economics_Nerd82 Posted October 24, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,903 Reputation: 10 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/09/2006 Share Posted October 24, 2007 You would think that a #23 vs #10 would get more coverage... seriously, who in Louisiana cares about Texas and Nebraska. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USF_Grouper Posted October 24, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,369 Reputation: 92 Days Won: 7 Joined: 11/19/2005 Share Posted October 24, 2007 You would think that a #23 vs #10 would get more coverage... seriously, who in Louisiana cares about Texas and Nebraska.What do those percentages mean? Based on # of stations, population, land mass?Also I am reading that right to say that only USF is in HD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theman123 Posted October 24, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,591 Reputation: 204 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/10/2006 Share Posted October 24, 2007 You would think that a #23 vs #10 would get more coverage... seriously, who in Louisiana cares about Texas and Nebraska.What do those percentages mean? Based on # of stations, population, land mass?Also I am reading that right to say that only USF is in HD?im pretty sure land mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWMJD Posted October 24, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,048 Reputation: 316 Days Won: 6 Joined: 11/24/2005 Share Posted October 24, 2007 You would think that a #23 vs #10 would get more coverage... seriously, who in Louisiana cares about Texas and Nebraska.What do those percentages mean? Based on # of stations, population, land mass?Also I am reading that right to say that only USF is in HD?im pretty sure land mass.Don't think so because it appears red covers considerably more than 54% of that map... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 What do those percentages mean? Based on # of stations, population, land mass?Either households or affiliates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeB Posted October 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 9,759 Reputation: 592 Days Won: 9 Joined: 08/05/2005 Share Posted October 25, 2007 It could be worse. If you were a Minnesota fan, you can't even watch them play the Wolverines if you live in Minneapolis. Looks like they are getting Texas too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksquire Posted October 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,254 Reputation: 3 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/29/2006 Share Posted October 25, 2007 Looks like the Presidential election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theman123 Posted October 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,591 Reputation: 204 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/10/2006 Share Posted October 25, 2007 It could be worse. If you were a Minnesota fan, you can't even watch them play the Wolverines if you live in Minneapolis. Looks like they are getting Texas too.i dont know if they want to watch minnesota right now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bull2saintleo Posted October 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,095 Reputation: 159 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/17/2004 Share Posted October 25, 2007 It could be worse. If you were a Minnesota fan, you can't even watch them play the Wolverines if you live in Minneapolis. Looks like they are getting Texas too.Just to clarify, if you read the notes at the bottom, the Michigan-Minnesota game is being aired on ESPNU. The Detroit ABC station is picking up that feed and broadcasting it on their network. Minneapolis/St. Paul is just not picking it up and forcing fans to watch via ESPNU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullz97 Posted October 25, 2007 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 486 Reputation: 3 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/10/2003 Share Posted October 25, 2007 It could be worse. If you were a Minnesota fan, you can't even watch them play the Wolverines if you live in Minneapolis. Looks like they are getting Texas too.Just to clarify, if you read the notes at the bottom, the Michigan-Minnesota game is being aired on ESPNU. The Detroit ABC station is picking up that feed and broadcasting it on their network. Minneapolis/St. Paul is just not picking it up and forcing fans to watch via ESPNU.MN vs Mich is on ESPN classic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.