Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

OCS Rumors Swirling


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  17
  • Content Count:  1,080
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/06/2006

Why waste time/energy/money on this. I still think we should approach Busch Gardens to build/fund a stadium across the street.

Busch Gardens Stadium?

Yuenling Stadium?

SheiKra Stadium?

WRONG..............  How about Leavitt Stadium!!!!!            :D

How much do you think Jim Leavitt would be willing to pay for the naming rights?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  724
  • Content Count:  10,219
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/17/2002

10-15 year time table is about right.

would TSA step up and assist?

another run at the olympics would help

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  38
  • Content Count:  4,016
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/20/2002

USF's future expansion needs go well beyond building an OCS.  I wouldn't count the aquisition of the mall property out just yet.

Not trying to feed fuel to the fire but Hillsborough County almost lost an enormous component of Moffitt Cancer Center, actually their new collaborative effort with Merck, to Pasco because of the availability of land.  USF, and Hillsborough do not want to lose Moffitt to Pasco just because of land, it would be destructive to the University if Moffitt moved all it's research out to Pasco and just kept the in-patient hospital on USF land.  They found some land near the campus to help, but it won't be enough for a long-term solution.  USF is also planning on expanding the research park.  

I am just saying with USF's building plans, and what's already on campus that can never be torn down and have really helped USF grow, expansion or land purchases are inevitable for USF.  

With that being said the OCS thoughts have always centered around the Athletics Compound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  185
  • Content Count:  3,307
  • Reputation:   12
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/26/2002

Do stadiums up north cost more to build than a stadium in Florida? Rentschler Field and Cardinal Stadium have to be able to get through the winter when it gets really cold, like it is there now. They probably have to account for that in construction. Meanwhile it hardly ever gets below freezing in Tampa.

Also, how much site preparation would you really need if USF already owns the land? If I remember correctly, the big reason that the CITS cost so much less than every other new stadium ($168M vs. $400M+) is because TSA already owned the land it was built on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  UCF Knights
  • Topic Count:  207
  • Content Count:  2,276
  • Reputation:   9
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2000

Also, how much site preparation would you really need if USF already owns the land? If I remember correctly, the big reason that the CITS cost so much less than every other new stadium ($168M vs. $400M+) is because TSA already owned the land it was built on.

Also...prep site/clean-up site work is always included in the cost of the stadiums (like the above).

Major chunk of Papa John's Stadium cost was the clean up of the former railyard & factory that was in that same location now as the stadium.

Also...for UCONN (paid entirely by the State of Connecticut...and not the school), that stadium site was a former Pratt & Whitney engine builder.

In UCF's case...the stadium is being built on the same site as the former practice fields...so almost zero clean-up/prep work (i.e. wasted cost) needed to be done.

If USF has some vacant empty land to build on...that would probably save the school mega $$$$ as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do stadiums up north cost more to build than a stadium in Florida? Rentschler Field and Cardinal Stadium have to be able to get through the winter when it gets really cold, like it is there now. They probably have to account for that in construction. Meanwhile it hardly ever gets below freezing in Tampa.

Also, how much site preparation would you really need if USF already owns the land? If I remember correctly, the big reason that the CITS cost so much less than every other new stadium ($168M vs. $400M+) is because TSA already owned the land it was built on.

CITS cost more than $300 million... the public only paid $168 million, the rest came from the Glazers...

And stadiums down here have to withstand category 5 hurricanes, which compensates for not having to survive for long periods of time below freezing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  176
  • Content Count:  4,642
  • Reputation:   9
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/09/2006

has anyone confirmed if the mall has even purchased at all?  is this thread even going anywhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  98
  • Content Count:  1,532
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/05/2005

That I know of, no one has bought the mall yet.  

Remember, this mall has been on the market for months or years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  UCF Knights
  • Topic Count:  207
  • Content Count:  2,276
  • Reputation:   9
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2000

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

Do stadiums up north cost more to build than a stadium in Florida? Rentschler Field and Cardinal Stadium have to be able to get through the winter when it gets really cold, like it is there now. They probably have to account for that in construction. Meanwhile it hardly ever gets below freezing in Tampa.

Also, how much site preparation would you really need if USF already owns the land? If I remember correctly, the big reason that the CITS cost so much less than every other new stadium ($168M vs. $400M+) is because TSA already owned the land it was built on.

CITS cost more than $300 million... the public only paid $168 million, the rest came from the Glazers...

And stadiums down here have to withstand category 5 hurricanes, which compensates for not having to survive for long periods of time below freezing.

Generally, nothing in the US is designed to resist a Cat 5 hurricane.  The design wind speed for RJS would have been 120 mph (a mid Cat 3 hurricane).  A stadium at, or near USF would be deisgned for wind speeds closer to 110 mph (a low Cat 3 hurricane).  Uconn's stadium would have been between 100-110 mph.  Louisville, 90 mph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.