GoUSFBulls.com: Scott Names Bohanon Bulls' Starter At Quarterback

[USFbulls24]

12 hours ago, JTrue said:

If anyone was confident he could beat 4/5, Gerry wouldn't be here.

Totally disagree. Jeff Scott isn't aiming for 4 wins, he's shooting much higher which is why Bohanon is here. And like I said, if Bohanon gets you to 6+ wins it was the right move. If he doesn't, then in my opinion it was the wrong move. 

[Rocky Style]

7 minutes ago, USFbulls24 said:

Totally disagree. Jeff Scott isn't aiming for 4 wins, he's shooting much higher which is why Bohanon is here. And like I said, if Bohanon gets you to 6+ wins it was the right move. If he doesn't, then in my opinion it was the wrong move. 

Hmm I don't think so.  Making the gamble in this case was still the right move.  

[BDYZR]

40 minutes ago, USFbulls24 said:

Totally disagree. Jeff Scott isn't aiming for 4 wins, he's shooting much higher which is why Bohanon is here. And like I said, if Bohanon gets you to 6+ wins it was the right move. If he doesn't, then in my opinion it was the wrong move. 

There are a minimum of 21 others that will figure highly into any win total.

[Triple B]

33 minutes ago, BDYZR said:

There are a minimum of 21 others that will figure highly into any win total.

Especially a certain 11 others ....

[Friscobull]

4 minutes ago, Triple B said:

Especially a certain 11 others ....

That would be 10 OTHERS, your math sucks

[Triple B]

18 minutes ago, Friscobull said:

That would be 10 OTHERS, your math sucks

[Friscobull]

30 minutes ago, Triple B said:

So all of our success relies on the play of our D, he can play lights out or terrible but it wont matter if our D is bad.  Our Qb play was 5 tds and 8 picks last year but the only reason we only won 2 games was because of our D.  Have you ever seen D’’s give up due to an offense that was putrid?
Trips you are unbelievable, you have baked in excuses prior to a down being played. You hold nobody accountable for anything, what a pushover you are

[BDYZR]

59 minutes ago, Friscobull said:

That would be 10 OTHERS, your math sucks

Not if you're basing winning on being able to outscore those 11 giving up 40-50 points per game.

[Triple B]

1 minute ago, Friscobull said:

So all of our success relies on the play of our D, he can play lights out or terrible but it wont matter if our D is bad.  Our Qb play was 5 tds and 8 picks last year but the only reason we only won 2 games was because of our D.  Have you ever seen D’’s give up due to an offense that was putrid?
Trips you are unbelievable, you have baked in excuses prior to a down being played. You hold nobody accountable for anything, what a pushover you are

Right, I said 'all'  ..... We gave up 35.3 points a game last year so the saviour could score 5 td's per game and we'd still have a **** record.

[Friscobull]

4 minutes ago, Triple B said:

Right, I said 'all'  ..... We gave up 35.3 points a game last year so the saviour could score 5 td's per game and we'd still have a **** record.

You said certainly 11, which meant  our D.  Don’t you think some of our ineptitude on D was the offenses failure to get first downs, turnovers and sustained drives putting pressure on the D?  We wont give up 35 a game but if we do GB will get us 36, trust in our savior and you shall be free.