NewEnglandBull Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted August 5, 2018 8 minutes ago, chapelbull said: There will be no P6 But there will be a P4.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,272 Reputation: 6,158 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted August 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, chapelbull said: There will be no P6 Never ever it’s sad that the stupid marketing ploy actually caused hope for some people. There is a better chance of college football disappearing than the p5 welcoming anyone else to their party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapelbull Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 7,683 Reputation: 1,491 Days Won: 17 Joined: 08/27/2017 Share Posted August 5, 2018 17 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said: But there will be a P4.... And that is our best shot. I think the perfect scenario is 4 - 16 team "super" conferences with the season culminating in an 8 team playoff. One step further, break D1 into multiple levels and multiple championships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted August 5, 2018 11 minutes ago, chapelbull said: And that is our best shot. I think the perfect scenario is 4 - 16 team "super" conferences with the season culminating in an 8 team playoff. One step further, break D1 into multiple levels and multiple championships. Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted August 5, 2018 12 hours ago, chapelbull said: And that is our best shot. I think the perfect scenario is 4 - 16 team "super" conferences with the season culminating in an 8 team playoff. One step further, break D1 into multiple levels and multiple championships. The first option sounds pretty solid, the second option sounds horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapelbull Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 7,683 Reputation: 1,491 Days Won: 17 Joined: 08/27/2017 Share Posted August 5, 2018 12 hours ago, chapelbull said: And that is our best shot. I think the perfect scenario is 4 - 16 team "super" conferences with the season culminating in an 8 team playoff. One step further, break D1 into multiple levels and multiple championships. 11 minutes ago, raptorcj said: The first option sounds pretty solid, the second option sounds horrible. There is more than 64 teams in D1. IF you go with option 1 alone, then there are still a bunch of teams left out of the mix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_Bullnard_Shaw Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 55 Content Count: 6,740 Reputation: 1,743 Days Won: 17 Joined: 11/04/2012 Share Posted August 5, 2018 I'll listen to ECU folks talk about realignment after they make the jump to P5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted August 5, 2018 1 hour ago, chapelbull said: 1 hour ago, raptorcj said: The first option sounds pretty solid, the second option sounds horrible. There is more than 64 teams in D1. IF you go with option 1 alone, then there are still a bunch of teams left out of the mix. It's the multiple levels thing that threw me. I'd hate to see under-championships, just keep CCs and a wider playoff and I'd be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
79 Bull Posted August 5, 2018 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 687 Content Count: 7,660 Reputation: 1,220 Days Won: 6 Joined: 07/10/2003 Share Posted August 5, 2018 16 hours ago, chapelbull said: And that is our best shot. I think the perfect scenario is 4 - 16 team "super" conferences with the season culminating in an 8 team playoff. One step further, break D1 into multiple levels and multiple championships. There are currently 65 p5 teams. In the p4 scenario, which 5 teams are not going to fight being eliminated so that 4 of us g5 can get a seat? I just don’t see it happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonb56 Posted August 5, 2018 Group: Member Topic Count: 347 Content Count: 1,867 Reputation: 202 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/13/2003 Share Posted August 5, 2018 Realignment will move where the money is... It's moving away from cable subscribers an more towards individual schools and the fan bases they can bring. Long-term, I see distributors like Google, Amazon, Netflix even ESPN and others charging two hundred dollars a season to watch our games. bigger fan bases will pull in more revenue, and schools like Rutgers lose even more value to a conference. My opinion, but changes are coming, and that can only mean more opportunity for USF. I would rather be USF than Iowa State long-term... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now