CJS Post SMU

[Triple B]

Just now, Brad said:

Maybe he was referring to the first part of the comment that reads as if SMU receivers were not wide open.  They were.

If they were wide open all the time wouldn't they have dropped 70 on us?

[Friscobull]

34 minutes ago, Triple B said:

Makes you wonder at times what game some of our fans were watching ....

Drinking does make the details of the game quite fuzzy at times, however it is an effective way to cope with our play. 

[USFBULL_08]

12 minutes ago, Brad said:

Maybe he was referring to the first part of the comment that reads as if SMU receivers were not wide open.  They were.

I can confirm they were open. Crappy DBs are to blame.

It's funny when coaches actually coach to hide inefficiencies then people call them out for not coaching.

[Triple B]

5 minutes ago, Friscobull said:

Drinking does make the details of the game quite fuzzy at times, however it is an effective way to cope with our play. 

I can't argue with that and it may explain some things ....

[Brad]

14 minutes ago, Triple B said:

If they were wide open all the time wouldn't they have dropped 70 on us?

Not sure what you’re getting at.  That they weren’t wide open enough to totally destroy us?  There were few, if any, contested catches, probably less contested catches than there were PI calls.  They were open in space a lot.  I don’t know how that can be argued.  

[USFBULL_08]

5 minutes ago, Brad said:

Not sure what you’re getting at.  That they weren’t wide open enough to totally destroy us?  There were few, if any, contested catches, probably less contested catches than there were PI calls.  They were open in space a lot.  I don’t know how that can be argued.  

So what's your plan for defending them with 2nd, 3rd string and walk ons playing in the backfield?

[El_Toro_86]

Not sure there’s anything CJS can say that’ll change how people feel.  Winning is the only thing now that matters.

[Brad]

6 minutes ago, USFBULL_08 said:

So what's your plan for defending them with 2nd, 3rd string and walk ons playing in the backfield?

 

I don’t have a plan.  I’m simply commenting on what I saw in the game.  If I had a plan, not sure it would matter.

The fact we are undermanned makes this a reality, it doesn’t deny the reality.

[Triple B]

10 minutes ago, Brad said:

Not sure what you’re getting at.  That they weren’t wide open enough to totally destroy us?  There were few, if any, contested catches, probably less contested catches than there were PI calls.  They were open in space a lot.  I don’t know how that can be argued.  

I'm getting at what coach actually said ...

[Brad]

2 minutes ago, Triple B said:

I'm getting at what coach actually said ...

Oh, LOL….  “All the time” literally?  Ha ha…

Yeah, maybe not open on run plays or special teams plays.  Trip….

Enough of the time I guess.  Too much.