CJS Post SMU

[USFBULL_08]

1 minute ago, Brad said:

I don’t have a plan.  I’m simply commenting on what I saw in the game.  If I had a plan, not sure it would matter.

The fact we are undermanned makes this a reality, it doesn’t deny the reality.

The context was off.

It was a theoretical plan not literal bc none of us are coaches. All this poor coaching crap and nobody has said how they could have schemed better than what they did with that they have.

[Triple B]

2 minutes ago, El_Toro_86 said:

Not sure there’s anything CJS can say that’ll change how people feel.  Winning is the only thing now that matters.

Coaches saying things usually never change how people feel, unless they want to use it as more ammo to pile on. Winning is always what should matter but there are situations when it does go beyond that. Remember in 2018 when we were 7-0 ..... winning wasn't all that mattered back then.

[Brad]

3 minutes ago, USFBULL_08 said:

The context was off.

It was a theoretical plan not literal bc none of us are coaches. All this poor coaching crap and nobody has said how they could have schemed better than what they did with that they have.

I’d recommend if you’re asking a question re: poor coaching you direct it to someone that makes that claim.  I have not.  I openly admit to never having played or coached football.  And because of that I choose not to be an armchair “coach”.  I’m only pointing out what I saw, not realizing I was in a debate about “all the time” they were open.

[Triple B]

5 minutes ago, Brad said:

Oh, LOL….  “All the time” literally?  Ha ha…

Yeah, maybe not open on run plays or special teams plays.  Trip….

Enough of the time I guess.  Too much.

Literally is how I roll ....

[Brad]

Attach video of you rolling, please.  

[Triple B]

1 minute ago, Brad said:

Attach video of you rolling, please.

[Brad]

Ok, you win.

[NewEnglandBull]

41 minutes ago, Brad said:

Not sure what you’re getting at.  That they weren’t wide open enough to totally destroy us?  There were few, if any, contested catches, probably less contested catches than there were PI calls.  They were open in space a lot.  I don’t know how that can be argued.  

True, they knew right where to go in the soft spots of the zone. Has been true most of the year, our zone coverage has been loosey-goosey. However, I would not jump completely on the defensive backs as the defensive linemen and linebackers typically get no pressure at all on the quarterback.

Edited October 3, 2021 by NewEnglandBull

[USFBULL_08]

26 minutes ago, Brad said:

I’d recommend if you’re asking a question re: poor coaching you direct it to someone that makes that claim.  I have not.  I openly admit to never having played or coached football.  And because of that I choose not to be an armchair “coach”.  I’m only pointing out what I saw, not realizing I was in a debate about “all the time” they were open.

You werent in a debate. Just tired of the same poor coaching comments with nothing else to back it up.

[94 Bull]

1 hour ago, Brad said:

Maybe he was referring to the first part of the comment that reads as if SMU receivers were not wide open.  They were.

SMU was wide open all game.