Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

SI article on Jeff Scott


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Content Count:  3,407
  • Reputation:   1,186
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/09/2010

53 minutes ago, puc86 said:

No you heard from some people that it is not in USF’s best interest mostly because it is not in USF’s best interest.

It is USF's best and most interest in years outside of this board!  Not sure I get your logic here 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

2 minutes ago, Sk00b said:

It is USF's best and most interest in years outside of this board!  Not sure I get your logic here 🤔

He has no logic...just consistency 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  147
  • Content Count:  19,265
  • Reputation:   6,144
  • Days Won:  255
  • Joined:  10/13/2002

3 minutes ago, Sk00b said:

It is USF's best and most interest in years outside of this board!  Not sure I get your logic here 🤔

Just that while I can see the benefit to CJS and Clemson it is at best a net neutral to us and we would be better off having a coach. I don’t think it’s the worst possible thing for us it only seems that way because people have convinced themselves this is somehow great, it’s not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  583
  • Content Count:  22,702
  • Reputation:   5,835
  • Days Won:  108
  • Joined:  09/13/2007

2 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

He has no logic...just consistency 

Not sure about the consistent part unless consistently inconsistent.  He does hold true on CJL though.  :hijack:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Content Count:  3,407
  • Reputation:   1,186
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/09/2010

1 minute ago, puc86 said:

Just that while I can see the benefit to CJS and Clemson it is at best a net neutral to us and we would be better off having a coach. I don’t think it’s the worst possible thing for us it only seems that way because people have convinced themselves this is somehow great, it’s not.

I believe we got the best possible scenario for success. Does that mean it will come to fruition? Nope, but I'll take my chances with a championship coach from arguably the best program in the nation. He sure as hell better be able to lead the staff (remotley) he hired in his absence...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  147
  • Content Count:  19,265
  • Reputation:   6,144
  • Days Won:  255
  • Joined:  10/13/2002

1 minute ago, Sk00b said:

I believe we got the best possible scenario for success. Does that mean it will come to fruition? Nope, but I'll take my chances with a championship coach from arguably the best program in the nation. He sure as hell better be able to lead the staff (remotley) he hired in his absence...

No one is arguing that he can’t just that USF would be best served by him focusing on USF, it’s not a hot take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Content Count:  3,407
  • Reputation:   1,186
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/09/2010

1 minute ago, puc86 said:

No one is arguing that he can’t just that USF would be best served by him focusing on USF, it’s not a hot take.

Maybe he is scouting LSU 4th string talent for the portal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  147
  • Content Count:  19,265
  • Reputation:   6,144
  • Days Won:  255
  • Joined:  10/13/2002

2 minutes ago, Sk00b said:

Maybe he is scouting LSU 4th string talent for the portal.

Maybe but we would still be best served by this being a full time job instead of a part time one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Content Count:  3,407
  • Reputation:   1,186
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/09/2010

Luckily, it will be after they lose to LSU. I still believe it doesn't matter at this point.  Not much to coach up that is going to change next year during this time period.  But, you may be right if we lose to BCC.  Then I will never question you again lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,615
  • Content Count:  74,634
  • Reputation:   10,874
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

50 minutes ago, puc86 said:

Just that while I can see the benefit to CJS and Clemson it is at best a net neutral to us and we would be better off having a coach.

We have 11 of them ........... but I'm sure since the boss isn't there, the scene at the football offices in the Selmon look something like this:

spacer.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.