Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

USF switching to Adidas?


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

2 hours ago, Apis Bull said:

We were Nike before UA.  I think we were Sports Belle before Nike.

I could have sworn we were Adidas. I know I had USF gear at one time by them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

12 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

I could have sworn we were Adidas. I know I had USF gear at one time by them. 

I have an old Adidas polo from back then.  I think because we were with Sports Belle, several companies made licensed fan apparel.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

3 minutes ago, Apis Bull said:

I have an old Adidas polo from back then.  I think because we were with Sports Belle, several companies made licensed fan apparel.  

Ok that makes sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  1,750
  • Content Count:  17,471
  • Reputation:   1,225
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  08/16/2004

That explains the Under Armor sales on USF gear at the Football games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  37
  • Content Count:  406
  • Reputation:   82
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/12/2003

2 hours ago, JTrue said:

Reebok was once a big thing in the NHL, too. 

Doesn’t Adidas own Reebok?  Either way, they are no Nike, but a step up from UA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

I like Under Armour gear

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,686
  • Reputation:   1,237
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

UA redefined athletic wear. I like their college athletic gear the most as well. Addidas is my least favorite. Their stuff feels a little bland and boring to me. 

But if it comes down the dollars, and Addidas outbids UA, then by all means Addidas, come on down.

Edited by Gismo
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  743
  • Content Count:  13,357
  • Reputation:   2,482
  • Days Won:  63
  • Joined:  12/11/2006

Please make shell top cleats

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  2,461
  • Reputation:   1,134
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  04/08/2012

4 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said:

I could have sworn we were Adidas. I know I had USF gear at one time by them. 

We actually weren't Nike or Adidas  before UA. We never had a department deal for UA. Each team worked their own deal. When Sports Belle made the original football uniforms, we wore Nike shoes for football and sideline gear, it was just that Nike offered us so little money back then we went with the best deal for the uniforms. Plus Jim Leavitt liked the darkest green possible, Nike made us wear Michigan State green. If you compare old photos, Sports Belle was a much darker green jersey than Nike. 

Seth Greenberg was a Reebok guy. McCullum might have been Addidas. 

When USF signed the UA deal is was for all sports. 

Now the bad news, our UA deal was when we were in the Big East, don't be shocked if the Adidas deal is for less money per year, like our TV deal, the value may have gone down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

1 minute ago, Mike Stuben said:

We actually weren't Nike or Adidas  before UA. We never had a department deal for UA. Each team worked their own deal. When Sports Belle made the original football uniforms, we wore Nike shoes for football and sideline gear, it was just that Nike offered us so little money back then we went with the best deal for the uniforms. Plus Jim Leavitt liked the darkest green possible, Nike made us wear Michigan State green. If you compare old photos, Sports Belle was a much darker green jersey than Nike. 

Seth Greenberg was a Reebok guy. McCullum might have been Addidas. 

When USF signed the UA deal is was for all sports. 

Now the bad news, our UA deal was when we were in the Big East, don't be shocked if the Adidas deal is for less money per year, like our TV deal, the value may have gone down. 

 Weren’t we one of the first universities to sign on with UA? I thought I heard they always gave us a sweetheart deal because of that. I wonder if that was taken off the table? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.