Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

RB Receiving Stats


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  486
  • Content Count:  12,475
  • Reputation:   2,855
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  12/14/2005

28 minutes ago, MMW said:

I think this is intentional.

I am curious to see time of possession statistics.

RANK    TEAM    G    TOP    AVGTOP

1    Georgia Tech    6    215    36
2    Navy    7    250    35
3    Wisconsin    7    247    35
4    UTSA    6    204    34
5    Army West Point    8    272    34
6    Georgia    7    237    34
7    Michigan St.    7    236    33
8    Virginia    7    235    33
9    Air Force    7    235    33
10    Michigan    7    232    33
11    Arizona St.    7    232    33
12    Ball St.    8    264    33
13    Miami (OH)    8    264    33
14    Hawaii    7    231    33
15    Washington St.    8    263    33
16    Pittsburgh    8    263    33
17    San Diego St.    8    262    32
18    Alabama    8    262    32
19    Toledo    8    261    32
20    TCU    7    228    32
21    Ga. Southern    6    194    32
22    Mississippi St.    7    227    32
23    Minnesota    7    226    32
24    Colorado St.    8    257    32
25    Virginia Tech    7    224    32
26    Fresno St.    7    224    32
27    Tulane    7    224    32
28    Southern Miss.    7    223    32
29    Florida St.    6    191    32
30    Arkansas    7    223    32
31    Marshall    7    223    32
32    LSU    8    255    32
33    Texas A&M    7    223    32
34    Texas    7    222    31
35    Utah    7    222    31
36    NC State    7    222    31
37    Kent St.    8    253    31
38    New Mexico    7    221    31
39    Georgia St.    7    220    31
40    South Fla.    7    219    31

http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/705

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  583
  • Content Count:  22,722
  • Reputation:   5,862
  • Days Won:  109
  • Joined:  09/13/2007

48 minutes ago, BDYZR said:

Scored one more TD per game on average last year compared to this year, overall, not just rb's. 

Rushing - down from 6.5 ypc in 2016 to 5.2 ypc in 2017

Passing - down from 8.2 in 2016 to 7.14 in 2017

Interesting stat - Average number of plays in 2016 - 71.38;   Average number of plays in 2017 -  84.57

All assuming my math is correct

http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/58/year/2016

GO BULLS!

 

 

45 minutes ago, MMW said:

I think this is intentional.

I am curious to see time of possession statistics.

It's quicker to get back to line up for a play from midfield than running to the sidelines maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  2,127
  • Reputation:   924
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

3 minutes ago, Bourbon Bull said:

 

It's quicker to get back to line up for a play from midfield than running to the sidelines maybe?

Last year we seem to snap the ball with a lot more time on the clock.  We still line up quickly and in some cases run a hurry up when we have the defense on its heels but play clock management looks deliberate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  70
  • Content Count:  611
  • Reputation:   275
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  01/27/2016

I mentioned this after the third week. Running back passes played a huge part of opening up the offense last year and I think it has hurt Flowers this year by not having that extra option. The defenses don't have to worry about it either. I don't care if it's a new coordinator, you use what you have to their best ability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  583
  • Content Count:  22,722
  • Reputation:   5,862
  • Days Won:  109
  • Joined:  09/13/2007

47 minutes ago, ToroDeFuego said:

I mentioned this after the third week. Running back passes played a huge part of opening up the offense last year and I think it has hurt Flowers this year by not having that extra option. The defenses don't have to worry about it either. I don't care if it's a new coordinator, you use what you have to their best ability. 

Egos.  Square peg, round hole?  Yep, I can do that.  FCWT did the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,688
  • Reputation:   1,237
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

Can we get the equivalent stats in here for RB rushing stats?

carries, yards and TDs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,615
  • Content Count:  74,733
  • Reputation:   10,959
  • Days Won:  425
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

1 hour ago, ToroDeFuego said:

I mentioned this after the third week. Running back passes played a huge part of opening up the offense last year and I think it has hurt Flowers this year by not having that extra option. The defenses don't have to worry about it either. I don't care if it's a new coordinator, you use what you have to their best ability. 

 

21 minutes ago, Bourbon Bull said:

Egos.  Square peg, round hole?  Yep, I can do that.  FCWT did the same thing.

42 pts/game vs 45 pts last year ... 5.2 yds/carry vs 6.5. Looks to me to be a round peg, round hole, with just a little smaller hole ...

Edited by Triple B
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,688
  • Reputation:   1,237
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

2 minutes ago, Triple B said:

 

42 pts/game vs 45 pts last year ... 5.2 yds/carry vs 6.5. Looks to me to be a round peg, round hole, with just a little smaller hole ...

And the answer is..... What is Marlon Mack worth? 

 

 

 

 

Was Marlon Mack worth 3 points per game and 1.3 yards per carry? 

 

What about our regressed special team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  295
  • Content Count:  4,131
  • Reputation:   818
  • Days Won:  15
  • Joined:  06/20/2005

Stats are for losers.

Only thing that matters is this team is 7 - 0.

Go Bulls!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

1 hour ago, MMW said:

Last year we seem to snap the ball with a lot more time on the clock.  We still line up quickly and in some cases run a hurry up when we have the defense on its heels but play clock management looks deliberate.

Gotta agree here. Looks very much like we have conscious forethought in clock mgmt. I like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.