So about QF...

[Boomer]

49 minutes ago, mjadams said:

2 out of 3 are spot on. Heisman talk is just funny now unless you are saying it was a myth. I can't tell.

yes - it was my myth example.

[USFBulls727]

6 hours ago, TromBull12 said:

So that's a bad game? We aren't in a pass heavy offense. Was he efficient? Was he influential and did he single handily impact the outcome of the game? Is he the most important/ valuable player on the field?

He did what he was asked to do and he looked darn good doing it. I remember when we had to attempt to win without a leader on the field. Q looked confident and dynamic. That's all I'm really saying. If it was so easy to do, we would look around the country and see many other mobile quarterbacks putting up his career numbers.

I started this thread so we can have some light hearted Q praise. We're quick to fuss when he's off and those same people are even quicker to qualify his good games. 

Competition, or lack there of,  doesn't make anyone successful. If it did, our down years wouldn't have been so down. If anyone could eat up a porous defense,  most in this conference would have 30+ point streaks. They don't, and it's not. Appreciate the man, the myth, and the legend while he's still wearing our school colors. 

Bad game? No, not at all. Granted, we really didn't need a ton of passing yards the way we were running the ball, but if you consider 10-18 160 yards lighting them with his arm, you have low standards for that. A lot to like about QF for sure, and I'm definitely glad we have him, but he's a far more talented runner than he is at throwing the ball. I believe that if Strong and Gilbert stick around though, this offense will be fine, and maybe even a little more balanced, in 2018 with Kean or Olakudun.