Paisa el Toro Posted January 26, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted January 26, 2017 18 hours ago, JoeB said: It all went downhill after Bibby's TV appearance. In what was a close game it turned out to be a blowout. Not enough horses. UConn was also playing with a short bench, so they were tired as well. We just don't have enough quality horses. I do see a difference in how the team is playing offensively. They seem to be running set calls and plays. USF MBB has actually been playing better under Bartow, it's just not translating into wins. Bartow has inherited a really bare cupboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted January 26, 2017 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 583 Content Count: 22,703 Reputation: 5,836 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted January 26, 2017 15 hours ago, brybull1970 said: Bartow will not get the HC job. Link? or just an opinion? People in the Green and Gold room seem to like him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky the Bull Posted January 27, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,036 Content Count: 7,517 Reputation: 1,119 Days Won: 10 Joined: 12/25/2001 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I was impressed with CMB when I met him at a practice session and he seems to run a very structured and strict practice. Lots of emphasis on defense, which is something we haven't seen much of in recent years. What I'm more impressed with his how the team seems to be playing with more intensity and purpose. The UConn game was actually entertaining and you felt that we actually had a chance. As mentioned, we just didn't have the bench (even less so than UConn) to be able to complete the comeback. Unless we are able to make a 'home run' type of hire, I would love to see what CMB can do with more time to bring in and develop players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted January 28, 2017 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 583 Content Count: 22,703 Reputation: 5,836 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted January 28, 2017 1 hour ago, brybull1970 said: He may be likable but I think Harlan needs to hit big on this next hire. Have a hard time seeing Bartow get the job if doesn't win a game. Someone called him likable? Link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 28, 2017 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 97,043 Reputation: 10,833 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted January 28, 2017 16 hours ago, brybull1970 said: He may be likable but I think Harlan needs to hit big on this next hire. Have a hard time seeing Bartow get the job if doesn't win a game. I don't think it's even about winning a game with this crew. It's about demonstrating competence. Demonstrating a plan to build a program that will attract players. Illustrating a vision and how to get there. Dragging in the next million dollar baby is something this program does not need right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TarHeel_Bull Posted January 28, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 97 Content Count: 1,180 Reputation: 249 Days Won: 2 Joined: 09/19/2015 Share Posted January 28, 2017 6 minutes ago, Brad said: I don't think it's even about winning a game with this crew. It's about demonstrating competence. Demonstrating a plan to build a program that will attract players. Illustrating a vision and how to get there. Dragging in the next million dollar baby is something this program does not need right now. I agree with this but here is my take. If Bartow is able to keep the entire current roster we have, which is very young and seems to like him, then we should keep him unless we can get a home run hire. I'm just afraid that we will bring in a new coach that is about as good as Bartow no all of our current players will leave and we will be left in another bare cupboard situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 28, 2017 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 97,043 Reputation: 10,833 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Agreed. Honestly, we don't need a home run hire. That would be more disarray on an expensive gamble. And I don't even like Bartow...still despise him from his UAfB days, but I am growing out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted January 28, 2017 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,636 Reputation: 10,876 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted January 28, 2017 28 minutes ago, Brad said: Dragging in the next million dollar baby is something this program does not need right now. We need a billion dollar baby, one who would bring instant credibility and, along with that, high profile recruits to here ... of which there's only a handful, maybe 2 handfuls) and that ain't happening. Bring whoever in and the most important thing to give him is time. Only a few really give a **** about the program right now so it's not like you're risking a ton of support ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TarHeel_Bull Posted January 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 97 Content Count: 1,180 Reputation: 249 Days Won: 2 Joined: 09/19/2015 Share Posted January 29, 2017 Just now, brybull1970 said: Reading this thread saddens me to see how far some of you have lowered the bar for this program. Likable is enough? Retaining players makes you qualified? We don't need a home run hire? I understand that the program will not be turned around overnight but we need to hire someone who can actually coach basketball, which doesn't seem to be a requirement based on this thread. You're saying Bartow can't coach? I've definitely seen a lot of improvement in this team since Antigua left. You just seem to set the bar way too high expecting greatness. We may be setting the bar to low, but you have been setting it way too high since Antigua got here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted January 29, 2017 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,636 Reputation: 10,876 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted January 29, 2017 17 minutes ago, brybull1970 said: Reading this thread saddens me to see how far some of you have lowered the bar for this program. Likable is enough? Retaining players makes you qualified? We don't need a home run hire? Retaining players is obviously not a qualification but it sure as hell is a want for those of us who don't want another COA scenario ... and by your last question, I assume you think we do need a home run hire so what's your definition of home run hire for us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now