George_Bullnard_Shaw Posted September 21, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 55 Content Count: 6,740 Reputation: 1,743 Days Won: 17 Joined: 11/04/2012 Share Posted September 21, 2015 Neither one is the QB next year. It just doesn't matter at all. If Woulard goes down, do you want a guy that's started 4 games in his college career, or do you want a guy that's started 13? I want a QB not an athlete who isn't one being allowed an interminable apprenticeship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 21, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 21, 2015 Neither one is the QB next year. It just doesn't matter at all. If Woulard goes down, do you want a guy that's started 4 games in his college career, or do you want a guy that's started 13? I want a QB not an athlete who isn't one being allowed an interminable apprenticeship. Not really an answer to my question, and 13 starts is not "interminable." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_Bullnard_Shaw Posted September 21, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 55 Content Count: 6,740 Reputation: 1,743 Days Won: 17 Joined: 11/04/2012 Share Posted September 21, 2015 Neither one is the QB next year. It just doesn't matter at all. If Woulard goes down, do you want a guy that's started 4 games in his college career, or do you want a guy that's started 13? I want a QB not an athlete who isn't one being allowed an interminable apprenticeship. Not really an answer to my question, and 13 starts is not "interminable." Every game QF plays is interminable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 21, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 21, 2015 Hahaha. Ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-Hornz Posted September 22, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 78 Content Count: 1,978 Reputation: 333 Days Won: 7 Joined: 04/19/2007 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Well looks like not much has changed since the start of the season...we are still split about 50-50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted September 22, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Author Share Posted September 22, 2015 I am literally amazed that there are people who think one or the other is going to make any difference whatsoever. We're talking 3-4 more completions a game if Team Bench has their way. We already know what Team Flowers gets. So the questions is, are we only 3-4 completions away from a team that doesn't make me want to eat a dirty diaper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gismo Posted September 22, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 417 Content Count: 9,687 Reputation: 1,237 Days Won: 8 Joined: 09/24/2009 Share Posted September 22, 2015 I am literally amazed that there are people who think one or the other is going to make any difference whatsoever. We're talking 3-4 more completions a game if Team Bench has their way. We already know what Team Flowers gets. So the questions is, are we only 3-4 completions away from a team that doesn't make me want to eat a dirty diaper? Agree, with Taggarts coaching Bench or Flowers makes little difference. Just need to call more passes with Flowers in my opinion. Needs to go through growing pains and receivers need to learn to always be ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 22, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 22, 2015 I am literally amazed that there are people who think one or the other is going to make any difference whatsoever. I think those people are a delusional few. I'm amazed that there are somewhat rational people that still think that Bench needs to have a shot, either because he hasn't gotten a fair shake or, worse yet, because they want to see what he can do ... as if we don't already know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDYZR Posted September 22, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 486 Content Count: 12,463 Reputation: 2,844 Days Won: 25 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted September 22, 2015 We're here because this team went to UM and, as a team, were NOT ready to play. Stop trying to blame any one player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 22, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 22, 2015 We're here because this team went to UM and, as a team, were NOT ready to play. Stop trying to blame any one player. This should have been posted on the "QF lovers, bring it" thread. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now