Rocky Style Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 109 Content Count: 21,119 Reputation: 4,625 Days Won: 39 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted September 19, 2015 If it were me, I would give Bench the same chance Flowers got. But that's why I am not a coach I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFBULL_08 Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 48 Content Count: 2,347 Reputation: 661 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/29/2009 Share Posted September 19, 2015 I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly. Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game. I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers. Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw. Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF. You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjadams Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 25 Content Count: 1,700 Reputation: 232 Days Won: 2 Joined: 08/27/2008 Share Posted September 19, 2015 Or passed the ball behind the line of scrimmage. How many completions were WR screens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Style Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 109 Content Count: 21,119 Reputation: 4,625 Days Won: 39 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted September 19, 2015 I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly. Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game. I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers. Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw. Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF. You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards? He got blowed up in the pocket. I wasn't seeing the magical agility until Maryland backed off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 19, 2015 I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly. Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game. I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers. Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw. Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF. You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards? He had better than 50% completion, and then a couple drops for TDs. Turn those into completions and that's 14 more points and he's 12-19, which isn't great numbers, but it's not terrible. Running for minimal yards, I'm not going to bash him for. Bench held the ball for too long on his ONE drive and was lucky not to throw a pick there. But then he threw a pick on his ONE drive. You can only blame a QB so much for sacks and pocket flushes. The O-line sucked today. Not QF's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 19, 2015 Or passed the ball behind the line of scrimmage. How many completions were WR screens? This is a playcalling issue. One of the things I'm the most disgusted with today is offensive playcalling. It was the definition of offensive today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted September 19, 2015 I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly. Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game. I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers. Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw. Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF. You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards? He got blowed up in the pocket. I wasn't seeing the magical agility until Maryland backed off. You have to blame the O-line for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFBULL_08 Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 48 Content Count: 2,347 Reputation: 661 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/29/2009 Share Posted September 19, 2015 (edited) I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly. Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game. I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards? He had better than 50% completion, and then a couple drops for TDs. Turn those into completions and that's 14 more points and he's 12-19, which isn't great numbers, but it's not terrible. Running for minimal yards, I'm not going to bash him for. Bench held the ball for too long on his ONE drive and was lucky not to throw a pick there. But then he threw a pick on his ONE drive. You can only blame a QB so much for sacks and pocket flushes. The O-line sucked today. Not QF's fault. Fair enough on the line, but if you have zero threat of throwing then what happens? In addition, the inside runs and screens are awful. How do they spread when no one believes they can? Edited September 19, 2015 by USFBULL_08 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Style Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 109 Content Count: 21,119 Reputation: 4,625 Days Won: 39 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted September 19, 2015 I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly. Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game. I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers. Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw. Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF. You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards? He got blowed up in the pocket. I wasn't seeing the magical agility until Maryland backed off. You have to blame the O-line for this. Yeah but I am just pointing that out because one of the knocks on Bench is that he takes sacks... I didn't see a very elusive QF today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-Hornz Posted September 19, 2015 Group: Member Topic Count: 78 Content Count: 1,978 Reputation: 333 Days Won: 7 Joined: 04/19/2007 Share Posted September 19, 2015 I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly. Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game. I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers. Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw. Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF. You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards? He had better than 50% completion, and then a couple drops for TDs. Turn those into completions and that's 14 more points and he's 12-19, which isn't great numbers, but it's not terrible. Running for minimal yards, I'm not going to bash him for. Bench held the ball for too long on his ONE drive and was lucky not to throw a pick there. But then he threw a pick on his ONE drive. You can only blame a QB so much for sacks and pocket flushes. The O-line sucked today. Not QF's fault. Wow I didn't think anyone would come out trying to defend QF's performance today but look at that someone surprised me... If you want to say QF did not lose us the game alone, 100% agree...if you want to say WR didn't help him out 100% agree...if you want to say pulling him in the 4th then putting him back in makes no sense 100% agree... but to say its not QF had no fault you are way out in lala land... When is the last time we had a game that we only passed for 60yrds? Going to try and find it now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now