Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Start Bench


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  21,119
  • Reputation:   4,625
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

If it were me, I would give Bench the same chance Flowers got.  But that's why I am not a coach I guess :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  48
  • Content Count:  2,347
  • Reputation:   661
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/29/2009

I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly.

Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game.

I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.

Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.

Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.

You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  25
  • Content Count:  1,700
  • Reputation:   232
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  08/27/2008

Or passed the ball behind the line of scrimmage. How many completions were WR screens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  21,119
  • Reputation:   4,625
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

 

 

 

I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly.

Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game.

I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.

Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.

Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.

You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards?

 

 

He got blowed up in the pocket.  I wasn't seeing the magical agility until Maryland backed off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

 

 

 

I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly.

Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game.

I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.

Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.

Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.

You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards?

 

 

He had better than 50% completion, and then a couple drops for TDs.  Turn those into completions and that's 14 more points and he's 12-19, which isn't great numbers, but it's not terrible.

 

Running for minimal yards, I'm not going to bash him for.  Bench held the ball for too long on his ONE drive and was lucky not to throw a pick there.  But then he threw a pick on his ONE drive. 

 

You can only blame a QB so much for sacks and pocket flushes.  The O-line sucked today.  Not QF's fault.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

Or passed the ball behind the line of scrimmage. How many completions were WR screens?

 

This is a playcalling issue.  One of the things I'm the most disgusted with today is offensive playcalling.  It was the definition of offensive today.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

 

 

 

 

I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly.

Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game.

I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.

Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.

Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.

You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards?

 

 

He got blowed up in the pocket.  I wasn't seeing the magical agility until Maryland backed off.

 

 

You have to blame the O-line for this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  48
  • Content Count:  2,347
  • Reputation:   661
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/29/2009

I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly.

Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game.

I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.

Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.
Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.
You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards?

He had better than 50% completion, and then a couple drops for TDs. Turn those into completions and that's 14 more points and he's 12-19, which isn't great numbers, but it's not terrible.

Running for minimal yards, I'm not going to bash him for. Bench held the ball for too long on his ONE drive and was lucky not to throw a pick there. But then he threw a pick on his ONE drive.

You can only blame a QB so much for sacks and pocket flushes. The O-line sucked today. Not QF's fault.

Fair enough on the line, but if you have zero threat of throwing then what happens? In addition, the inside runs and screens are awful. How do they spread when no one believes they can? Edited by USFBULL_08
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  21,119
  • Reputation:   4,625
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

 

 

 

 

 

I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly.

Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game.

I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.

Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.

Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.

You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards?

 

 

He got blowed up in the pocket.  I wasn't seeing the magical agility until Maryland backed off.

 

 

You have to blame the O-line for this. 

 

 

Yeah but I am just pointing that out because one of the knocks on Bench is that he takes sacks...  I didn't see a very elusive QF today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  78
  • Content Count:  1,978
  • Reputation:   333
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  04/19/2007

 

 

 

 

I can't understand how people are still on the Bench bandwagon. Even his big completion for a first down wasn't a great throw, the receiver made a good catch. It was wobbly as hell too. He threw towards a receiver he thought was about 8 feet tall and then got picked ... badly.

Flowers belongs in the game. I don't know WTF CWT was thinking taking him out after the 17 play TD drive. That drive doesn't happen with Bench in the game.

I don't want to see Bench in the game again unless God forbid something happens to Flowers.

Flowers couldn't even find a Wr that would allow him to have a bad throw.

Really? Rodney Adams and DJ disagree. Both WRs cost us 14 points on solid throws from QF.

You're picking out two plas where he actually could find someone. What about every other time he held it too long and got sacked or ran for minimal yards?

 

 

He had better than 50% completion, and then a couple drops for TDs.  Turn those into completions and that's 14 more points and he's 12-19, which isn't great numbers, but it's not terrible.

 

Running for minimal yards, I'm not going to bash him for.  Bench held the ball for too long on his ONE drive and was lucky not to throw a pick there.  But then he threw a pick on his ONE drive. 

 

You can only blame a QB so much for sacks and pocket flushes.  The O-line sucked today.  Not QF's fault.  

 

Wow I didn't think anyone would come out trying to defend QF's performance today but look at that someone surprised me...

 

If you want to say QF did not lose us the game alone, 100% agree...if you want to say WR didn't help him out 100% agree...if you want to say pulling him in the 4th then putting him back in makes no sense 100% agree...

 

but to say its not QF had no fault you are way out in lala land...

 

When is the last time we had a game that we only passed for 60yrds? Going to try and find it now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.