bullsbucsfan426 Posted November 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 129 Content Count: 3,116 Reputation: 473 Days Won: 7 Joined: 11/28/2010 Share Posted November 13, 2014 If flowers comes in and proves to be a run threat it might take away from Macks carries. Doubtful if we run well. At his best b.j. Daniels and Lindsey Lamar ran for 300 combined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gismo Posted November 13, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 417 Content Count: 9,687 Reputation: 1,237 Days Won: 8 Joined: 09/24/2009 Share Posted November 13, 2014 (edited) If flowers comes in and proves to be a run threat it might take away from Macks carries.Doubtful if we run well. At his best b.j. Daniels and Lindsey Lamar ran for 300 combined What exactly is doubtful? That we have success running. If we aren't having success running, and Flowers is taking carries from the backs, then Mack may not break 1000 yards. Actually whether our running is successful or not I expect flowers playing to result in less carries for the backs than if White or Bench were playing. Edited November 13, 2014 by Gismo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted November 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Author Share Posted November 14, 2014 If flowers comes in and proves to be a run threat it might take away from Macks carries. Doubtful if we run well. At his best b.j. Daniels and Lindsey Lamar ran for 300 combined What exactly is doubtful? That we have success running. If we aren't having success running, and Flowers is taking carries from the backs, then Mack may not break 1000 yards. Actually whether our running is successful or not I expect flowers playing to result in less carries for the backs than if White or Bench were playing. You have a point, but I think Mack would be looking at a much better yard/carry then. He's been feast or famine...usually since the D can cheat up without fearing alternatives. Also, the play calling is fairly predictable oft times. All he needs is a gap & some open space. He can take it to the house anytime. Flowers waking up with offense could help with Mack, as the D needs to respect Flowers pulling it back & taking off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANJAY Posted November 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 300 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted November 14, 2014 Alternatively if the offense has more success and they are running more plays (growing the pie so to speak) then there may be more carries for everyone. We average around 60 plays a game. If the offense is moving on the ground then we should run around 75 which is about the college average. 15 more plays is a bunch of new carries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCBull Posted November 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 112 Content Count: 8,159 Reputation: 864 Days Won: 8 Joined: 09/25/2008 Share Posted November 14, 2014 If flowers comes in and proves to be a run threat it might take away from Macks carries.Doubtful if we run well. At his best b.j. Daniels and Lindsey Lamar ran for 300 combinedWhat exactly is doubtful? That we have success running. If we aren't having success running, and Flowers is taking carries from the backs, then Mack may not break 1000 yards. Actually whether our running is successful or not I expect flowers playing to result in less carries for the backs than if White or Bench were playing. You have a point, but I think Mack would be looking at a much better yard/carry then. He's been feast or famine...usually since the D can cheat up without fearing alternatives. Also, the play calling is fairly predictable oft times. All he needs is a gap & some open space. He can take it to the house anytime. Flowers waking up with offense could help with Mack, as the D needs to respect Flowers pulling it back & taking off. If the D had to respect Flowers' ability to run, wouldn't they stack the box even more and that would hurt Mack's production? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted November 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Author Share Posted November 14, 2014 If flowers comes in and proves to be a run threat it might take away from Macks carries. Doubtful if we run well. At his best b.j. Daniels and Lindsey Lamar ran for 300 combined What exactly is doubtful? That we have success running. If we aren't having success running, and Flowers is taking carries from the backs, then Mack may not break 1000 yards. Actually whether our running is successful or not I expect flowers playing to result in less carries for the backs than if White or Bench were playing. You have a point, but I think Mack would be looking at a much better yard/carry then. He's been feast or famine...usually since the D can cheat up without fearing alternatives. Also, the play calling is fairly predictable oft times. All he needs is a gap & some open space. He can take it to the house anytime. Flowers waking up with offense could help with Mack, as the D needs to respect Flowers pulling it back & taking off. If the D had to respect Flowers' ability to run, wouldn't they stack the box even more and that would hurt Mack's production? Only if he can't pass (See BJ v Florida). My point was if he can fake or hand to the RBs and we mix in the jet sweep, it can keep the D off balance & guessing. And of course, that opens play action pass...which could be HUGE, if successful early (this is where the rain/cold hinder this hope). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feardabull Posted November 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 138 Content Count: 3,594 Reputation: 202 Days Won: 3 Joined: 10/08/2007 Share Posted November 14, 2014 Forcast is looking better for tomorrow. Low of 41 and rain chance appears to be gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted November 14, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Author Share Posted November 14, 2014 Forcast is looking better for tomorrow. Low of 41 and rain chance appears to be gone SWEET! A warming front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JupiterBull Posted November 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 85 Content Count: 5,431 Reputation: 770 Days Won: 16 Joined: 02/08/2009 Author Share Posted November 16, 2014 Least of our worries, but Mack's 79 v SMU gives him 907. So, he needs 93 yards against 2 pretty stout teams, that we may be playing from behind. so, I'd say there's a 60% chance he breaks 1,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted November 16, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted November 16, 2014 mack is looking very pedestrian lately i think he is running out of gas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now