Triple B Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,612 Content Count: 74,539 Reputation: 10,818 Days Won: 422 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Faith in humanity? Joined Jan 13, 2011 ... You should know better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,612 Content Count: 74,539 Reputation: 10,818 Days Won: 422 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Oh wait So, to try to make this a semi-intelligent discussion and redirect to where the OP was headed. In general, should the team leading after the 1st half make adjustments? Wisconsin we were tied, so you could argue that adjustments should be made by both teams. Leading at the half vs ECU so should we expect a lot of adjustments? Behind vs Tulsa so adjustments should be made. But when the wheels start to fall off, like they did against ECU in the 2nd half, should we expect adjustments on the fly? Do you use a timeout here and there to get the player's heads back into it? With the type offense ECU was running, that could be a good use of timeouts .... but I also think coaches are reticent to use them early in halves unless absolutely necessary. Another one of those 20/20 hindsight type of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Faith in humanity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Style Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 109 Content Count: 21,013 Reputation: 4,544 Days Won: 38 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Did you listen to the press conference after the game? I remember Taggart saying something to the effect that the only difference in the 2nd half was people started making plays. That's essentially what I said at the top of the thread. I didn't see a schematic shift at all. Passes were on target as opposed to beginning of first QTR is one example I can point out. Since the offense played with urgency and got rolling, the defense was able to rest in the 2nd half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls2k Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 980 Reputation: 91 Days Won: 2 Joined: 12/07/2012 Share Posted October 21, 2014 I thought threads would get more intelligent once we had a decent game... The posts will get better in the 2nd half of the season...after we all adjust. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Style Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 109 Content Count: 21,013 Reputation: 4,544 Days Won: 38 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Not sure what adjustments were made other than throwing the ball down field to Andre Davis. Props to him for getting it figured out because a loss to Tulsa the way it was going would've been devastating. I think they attempted this in the first half as well, so I would call that execution rather than adjustment. Unless I "misremember" the first half, I remember some shots taken down the field that were just not accurate throws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 553 Content Count: 14,405 Reputation: 434 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted October 21, 2014 I have to agree with the poster that said the second half the team started executing. And add they stopped trying for INTs and started successfully batting balls that in the first half would have been completions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted October 21, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Faith in humanity? Joined Jan 13, 2011 ... You should know better. B^3 just dropped the mic on that one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USF_Grouper Posted October 22, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 584 Content Count: 10,369 Reputation: 92 Days Won: 7 Joined: 11/19/2005 Share Posted October 22, 2014 I thought threads would get more intelligent once we had a decent game... You thought that was a decent game?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted October 22, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted October 22, 2014 I thought threads would get more intelligent once we had a decent game... You thought that was a decent game?!?! Probably the best adjective to use 4. Fair; good enough; okay. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/decent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now