Guest Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 This power offense will not work here. Hell, it barely works at Stanford. College football has changed. Most programs are moving away from this offense and moving towards a more up tempo spread attack. We, on the other hand, stick with the 3 yards and a cloud of dust and put up 2 TDs a game. Alabama uses a power, pro-style offense... so does Michigan State... just two off the top of my head. This style of offense will work fine once we get talented players. Skip Holtz ran a spread offense... how did that work out? Those teams can recruit and land the players we can only dream about. Exactly. It's not about the scheme, it's about the players... in two years when Taggart has a team full of his recruits, people won't be complaining about a power offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFbulls24 Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 1,516 Reputation: 175 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2013 Share Posted October 12, 2014 This power offense will not work here. Hell, it barely works at Stanford. College football has changed. Most programs are moving away from this offense and moving towards a more up tempo spread attack. We, on the other hand, stick with the 3 yards and a cloud of dust and put up 2 TDs a game. Alabama uses a power, pro-style offense... so does Michigan State... just two off the top of my head. This style of offense will work fine once we get talented players. Skip Holtz ran a spread offense... how did that work out? There are very few teams that run it when talking about 124+ college football teams vs how many run that offense. I don't ever think it'll work the way it works at Stanford, Alabama, Michigan State, etc. I think it can be serviceable, but that's about it. Unless Taggart finds a way to get the next Blake Bortles here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFbulls24 Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 1,516 Reputation: 175 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2013 Share Posted October 12, 2014 This power offense will not work here. Hell, it barely works at Stanford. College football has changed. Most programs are moving away from this offense and moving towards a more up tempo spread attack. We, on the other hand, stick with the 3 yards and a cloud of dust and put up 2 TDs a game. Alabama uses a power, pro-style offense... so does Michigan State... just two off the top of my head. This style of offense will work fine once we get talented players. Skip Holtz ran a spread offense... how did that work out? Those teams can recruit and land the players we can only dream about. Exactly. It's not about the scheme, it's about the players... in two years when Taggart has a team full of his recruits, people won't be complaining about a power offense. So far that scheme has given us the 124/124 ranking in total offense last year, and 122/124 this year according to ESPN. http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/team/_/stat/total We have an issue with talent, but not THAT big of an issue... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sellular1 Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 196 Content Count: 6,617 Reputation: 1,782 Days Won: 51 Joined: 07/04/2008 Share Posted October 12, 2014 This power offense will not work here. Hell, it barely works at Stanford. College football has changed. Most programs are moving away from this offense and moving towards a more up tempo spread attack. We, on the other hand, stick with the 3 yards and a cloud of dust and put up 2 TDs a game. Alabama uses a power, pro-style offense... so does Michigan State... just two off the top of my head. This style of offense will work fine once we get talented players. Skip Holtz ran a spread offense... how did that work out? Those teams can recruit and land the players we can only dream about. Exactly. It's not about the scheme, it's about the players... in two years when Taggart has a team full of his recruits, people won't be complaining about a power offense. So far that scheme has given us the 124/124 ranking in total offense last year, and 122/124 this year according to ESPN. http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/team/_/stat/total We have an issue with talent, but not THAT big of an issue... It is pretty cool that 7 of the top 11 leaders in offense are G5 schools. Never would have thought that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South_Florida_Flip Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 99 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Execution was terrible I really think game changer was the called back first down early in 3rd quarter when we were driving. That penalty changed everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls On Parade Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 10,201 Reputation: 1,714 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/02/2005 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Execution was terrible I really think game changer was the called back first down early in 3rd quarter when we were driving. That penalty changed everything. It really did a td and we could have killed Ecu confidence... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snarling Bull Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 35 Content Count: 6,574 Reputation: 237 Days Won: 2 Joined: 07/19/2006 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Would, should, could, DIDN't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El_Toro_86 Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 176 Content Count: 8,612 Reputation: 2,661 Days Won: 28 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Would, should, could, DIDN't Kind of sums up USF athletics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted October 12, 2014 This power offense will not work here. Hell, it barely works at Stanford. College football has changed. Most programs are moving away from this offense and moving towards a more up tempo spread attack. We, on the other hand, stick with the 3 yards and a cloud of dust and put up 2 TDs a game. Alabama uses a power, pro-style offense... so does Michigan State... just two off the top of my head. This style of offense will work fine once we get talented players. Skip Holtz ran a spread offense... how did that work out? Better than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted October 12, 2014 It's not about the players, it's about the coaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now