USFbulls24 Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 1,516 Reputation: 175 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2013 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Taggart is not on the hot seat. I wish his offensive scheme was though. Taggart is his offensive scheme He will not change and will go down in flames because he is unwilling to adapt and change. The offensive system he wants to implement here can only work at a few places and USF isn't one of them. He was part of the Stanford transfomation and thinks it will work anywhere and the truth is it won't. All diehard Bulls fans, alumini and season ticket holders get a front row seat to the ever unfolding train wreck. I actually agree with a lot of what you said. I get to witness the train wreck every week and have said the same thing you have. I don't believe his offense will work here. I've said before there is a reason only a handful of teams use this offense out of 128. I do however believe our conference is SO BAD that we will win 3 or 4 games this year and it will be seen as "improvement" which doesn't put him on the hot seat. He will have the support as long as the wins improve from last year from Harlan and company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaltLiquorBull Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 96 Content Count: 4,078 Reputation: 1,389 Days Won: 14 Joined: 01/09/2006 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Really sad that we are now a fan base that fears ECU. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usfgrad84 Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 246 Content Count: 6,348 Reputation: 662 Days Won: 8 Joined: 05/25/2006 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Not sure about how it worked at WKU, but the reason it worked well in the early days at Stanford was you had 3 components missing from here. A Heisman finalist RB, an OL that could actually block and (what most people don't realize) a pretty mobile QB. When Luck ran this offense, he racked up some pretty good rushing yards. He was more of a passer his last year, but his junior year he had some significant yardage. Funny how the system works pretty good with a mobile QB at SF and Green Bay, but is already dying in NY (the Giants new OC is trying to change to a similar system and their offense is almost as bad as ours). Without all the right components in place this system is not all that Taggart thinks it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Not sure about how it worked at WKU, but the reason it worked well in the early days at Stanford was you had 3 components missing from here. A Heisman finalist RB, an OL that could actually block and (what most people don't realize) a pretty mobile QB. When Luck ran this offense, he racked up some pretty good rushing yards. He was more of a passer his last year, but his junior year he had some significant yardage. Funny how the system works pretty good with a mobile QB at SF and Green Bay, but is already dying in NY (the Giants new OC is trying to change to a similar system and their offense is almost as bad as ours). Without all the right components in place this system is not all that Taggart thinks it is. You left out kids with a Standford IQ. I'm sure that helps a bit when trying to get kids to overcome mental mistakes either in assignments or penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Not sure about how it worked at WKU, but the reason it worked well in the early days at Stanford was you had 3 components missing from here. A Heisman finalist RB, an OL that could actually block and (what most people don't realize) a pretty mobile QB. When Luck ran this offense, he racked up some pretty good rushing yards. He was more of a passer his last year, but his junior year he had some significant yardage. Funny how the system works pretty good with a mobile QB at SF and Green Bay, but is already dying in NY (the Giants new OC is trying to change to a similar system and their offense is almost as bad as ours). Without all the right components in place this system is not all that Taggart thinks it is. You left out kids with a Standford IQ. I'm sure that helps a bit when trying to get kids to overcome mental mistakes either in assignments or penalties. But then how do you explain WKU? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Not sure about how it worked at WKU, but the reason it worked well in the early days at Stanford was you had 3 components missing from here. A Heisman finalist RB, an OL that could actually block and (what most people don't realize) a pretty mobile QB. When Luck ran this offense, he racked up some pretty good rushing yards. He was more of a passer his last year, but his junior year he had some significant yardage. Funny how the system works pretty good with a mobile QB at SF and Green Bay, but is already dying in NY (the Giants new OC is trying to change to a similar system and their offense is almost as bad as ours). Without all the right components in place this system is not all that Taggart thinks it is. You left out kids with a Standford IQ. I'm sure that helps a bit when trying to get kids to overcome mental mistakes either in assignments or penalties. But then how do you explain WKU? 1. Bobby Rainey 2. Antonio Andrews That was the system at WKU against Sun-Belt competition. There was an actual system in place at Stanford and that one relied on a lot components we don't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFbulls24 Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 1,516 Reputation: 175 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2013 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Not sure about how it worked at WKU, but the reason it worked well in the early days at Stanford was you had 3 components missing from here. A Heisman finalist RB, an OL that could actually block and (what most people don't realize) a pretty mobile QB. When Luck ran this offense, he racked up some pretty good rushing yards. He was more of a passer his last year, but his junior year he had some significant yardage. Funny how the system works pretty good with a mobile QB at SF and Green Bay, but is already dying in NY (the Giants new OC is trying to change to a similar system and their offense is almost as bad as ours). Without all the right components in place this system is not all that Taggart thinks it is. It was well below average at WKU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFbulls24 Posted September 18, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 1,516 Reputation: 175 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/20/2013 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Not sure about how it worked at WKU, but the reason it worked well in the early days at Stanford was you had 3 components missing from here. A Heisman finalist RB, an OL that could actually block and (what most people don't realize) a pretty mobile QB. When Luck ran this offense, he racked up some pretty good rushing yards. He was more of a passer his last year, but his junior year he had some significant yardage. Funny how the system works pretty good with a mobile QB at SF and Green Bay, but is already dying in NY (the Giants new OC is trying to change to a similar system and their offense is almost as bad as ours). Without all the right components in place this system is not all that Taggart thinks it is. You left out kids with a Standford IQ. I'm sure that helps a bit when trying to get kids to overcome mental mistakes either in assignments or penalties. But then how do you explain WKU? What is there to explain? He was there for 3 seasons. Their offensive ranks were something like 101, 100, and 70 in his final year. Someone pointed out that the year after he left, Petrino had them as the 30th overall offense in all of college football. What they did obviously wasn't attributed to a very successful offense or anything like that. Taggart is a great recruiter as he showed last year. By playing sunbelt competition every week, just simply having better talent is going to put you on top the majority of your games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now