Who'sYourData? Posted October 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted October 26, 2013 Offense looked a lot better with him in there ... and yes I realize that wouldn't take much ... but I actually felt like we had a chance to score a TD with him in there. Assume he wasn't 100% was the reason he didn't start .... I wouldn't go as far as saying I felt like we could score a TD with him in there, but it certainly appeared that we could move the ball with him in there. Realistically, we lost this game because Eveld couldn't lead the team to a first down. I have unrealistically high hopes for White, but the only thing he could do worse would be to turn the ball over consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELdaBull Posted October 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 86 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted October 26, 2013 12 quarters without an offensive td. Eveld and Floyd should be benched for the rest of their careers. Bench is close to being on that list too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulls1181 Posted October 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 170 Content Count: 5,722 Reputation: 366 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/03/2011 Share Posted October 26, 2013 12 quarters without an offensive td. Eveld and Floyd should be benched for the rest of their careers. Bench is close to being on that list too. +1 I also think Eveld and Floyd are done barring injuries to Bench and White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rizman Posted October 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 2,345 Content Count: 21,365 Reputation: 922 Days Won: 10 Joined: 01/02/2007 Share Posted October 26, 2013 Because we wanted to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmhatter Posted October 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 576 Content Count: 8,174 Reputation: 268 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/02/2007 Author Share Posted October 26, 2013 Offense looked a lot better with him in there ... and yes I realize that wouldn't take much ... but I actually felt like we had a chance to score a TD with him in there. Assume he wasn't 100% was the reason he didn't start .... This is my feeling as well... He can actually complete a pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted October 26, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted October 26, 2013 Offense looked a lot better with him in there ... and yes I realize that wouldn't take much ... but I actually felt like we had a chance to score a TD with him in there. Assume he wasn't 100% was the reason he didn't start .... This is my feeling as well... He can actually complete a pass. He seems to read the field much better than Eveld, which results in getting the ball away more quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullrbest Posted October 27, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 2 Content Count: 12 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/23/2006 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Eveld made sense as starter today. It looked like he was paralyzed by trying to keep to the directive of "whatever you do, don't give up the ball." When he had to move, he resembled an iceberg - no speed and a big target. Paralysis by analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm101 Posted October 27, 2013 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 173 Content Count: 7,008 Reputation: 2,262 Days Won: 12 Joined: 06/11/2010 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Bench didn't drop passes. Bench didn't play for a weak o line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now