Bull-by-Marriage Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 355 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted October 13, 2013 While I know that the mere thought of discussing this is verboten amongst some of you. If Bench can't go against UL and if MW is close to Bobby why not play him. As it stands now we have the same or better opportunity to win the conference as anyone else. Why would we "save" a redshirt while sacrificing a season? If anyone else was listening on the radio, Jim Louk made a classic Freudian slip, when he got just a bit excited when he thought that White had been put in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feardabull Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 138 Content Count: 3,594 Reputation: 202 Days Won: 3 Joined: 10/08/2007 Share Posted October 13, 2013 While I know that the mere thought of discussing this is verboten amongst some of you. If Bench can't go against UL and if MW is close to Bobby why not play him. As it stands now we have the same or better opportunity to win the conference as anyone else. Why would we "save" a redshirt while sacrificing a season? If anyone else was listening on the radio, Jim Louk made a classic Freudian slip, when he got just a bit excited when he thought that White had been put in the game. If we somehow manage to upset louisville, i think the red shirt will be reconsidered because if bench cant go there should be no way taggart puts a bcs bowl bid on the shoulders of a former walkon who goes 8-28 in a game 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmhatter Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 576 Content Count: 8,174 Reputation: 268 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/02/2007 Share Posted October 13, 2013 i was very against burning the redshirt but in this case i'd be okay with it: Bench can't go the rest of the season. Can't get worse than Eveld/Floyd. Should get White geared up for the following year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.T. Posted October 13, 2013 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 4,751 Content Count: 37,676 Reputation: 2,367 Days Won: 29 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Try White. We have 3 years to find another QB. We have two weeks to get him ready. Our Offense needs better QB play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,737 Reputation: 10,961 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 13, 2013 While I know that the mere thought of discussing this is verboten amongst some of you. If Bench can't go against UL and if MW is close to Bobby why not play him. As it stands now we have the same or better opportunity to win the conference as anyone else. Why would we "save" a redshirt while sacrificing a season? If anyone else was listening on the radio, Jim Louk made a classic Freudian slip, when he got just a bit excited when he thought that White had been put in the game. If we somehow manage to upset louisville, i think the red shirt will be reconsidered because if bench cant go there should be no way taggart puts a bcs bowl bid on the shoulders of a former walkon who goes 8-28 in a game If we manage to upset Louisville, with Eveld, why in the world would you think CWT would change anything, other than Bench getting healthy? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 936 Reputation: 30 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/23/2012 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Try White. We have 3 years to find another QB. We have two weeks to get him ready. Our Offense needs better QB play! I agree redshirt years are overrated. If he offers us the best chance of winning start him now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feardabull Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 138 Content Count: 3,594 Reputation: 202 Days Won: 3 Joined: 10/08/2007 Share Posted October 13, 2013 While I know that the mere thought of discussing this is verboten amongst some of you. If Bench can't go against UL and if MW is close to Bobby why not play him. As it stands now we have the same or better opportunity to win the conference as anyone else. Why would we "save" a redshirt while sacrificing a season? If anyone else was listening on the radio, Jim Louk made a classic Freudian slip, when he got just a bit excited when he thought that White had been put in the game. If we somehow manage to upset louisville, i think the red shirt will be reconsidered because if bench cant go there should be no way taggart puts a bcs bowl bid on the shoulders of a former walkon who goes 8-28 in a game If we manage to upset Louisville, with Eveld, why in the world would you think CWT would change anything, other than Bench getting healthy? My post was made under the assumption that bench starts against UL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 936 Reputation: 30 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/23/2012 Share Posted October 13, 2013 While I know that the mere thought of discussing this is verboten amongst some of you. If Bench can't go against UL and if MW is close to Bobby why not play him. As it stands now we have the same or better opportunity to win the conference as anyone else. Why would we "save" a redshirt while sacrificing a season? If anyone else was listening on the radio, Jim Louk made a classic Freudian slip, when he got just a bit excited when he thought that White had been put in the game. If we somehow manage to upset louisville, i think the red shirt will be reconsidered because if bench cant go there should be no way taggart puts a bcs bowl bid on the shoulders of a former walkon who goes 8-28 in a game If we manage to upset Louisville, with Eveld, why in the world would you think CWT would change anything, other than Bench getting healthy? If Eveld starts against UL we stand no chance of winning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,737 Reputation: 10,961 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 13, 2013 While I know that the mere thought of discussing this is verboten amongst some of you. If Bench can't go against UL and if MW is close to Bobby why not play him. As it stands now we have the same or better opportunity to win the conference as anyone else. Why would we "save" a redshirt while sacrificing a season? If anyone else was listening on the radio, Jim Louk made a classic Freudian slip, when he got just a bit excited when he thought that White had been put in the game. If we somehow manage to upset louisville, i think the red shirt will be reconsidered because if bench cant go there should be no way taggart puts a bcs bowl bid on the shoulders of a former walkon who goes 8-28 in a game If we manage to upset Louisville, with Eveld, why in the world would you think CWT would change anything, other than Bench getting healthy? My post was made under the assumption that bench starts against UL Ah, so Bench plays and wins against Louisville but gets hurt again ... still, unless MW is really doing some unbelievable stuff in practice, I see him going back to Bobby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 13, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,737 Reputation: 10,961 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 13, 2013 While I know that the mere thought of discussing this is verboten amongst some of you. If Bench can't go against UL and if MW is close to Bobby why not play him. As it stands now we have the same or better opportunity to win the conference as anyone else. Why would we "save" a redshirt while sacrificing a season? If anyone else was listening on the radio, Jim Louk made a classic Freudian slip, when he got just a bit excited when he thought that White had been put in the game. If we somehow manage to upset louisville, i think the red shirt will be reconsidered because if bench cant go there should be no way taggart puts a bcs bowl bid on the shoulders of a former walkon who goes 8-28 in a game If we manage to upset Louisville, with Eveld, why in the world would you think CWT would change anything, other than Bench getting healthy? If Eveld starts against UL we stand no chance of winning. Cue the Dumb and Dumber clip .... There's always a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now