Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

The Good, Bad, Ugly - @ Marquette


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,613
  • Content Count:  74,618
  • Reputation:   10,871
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

I think charsibb is trying to convey is:

 

"given that our first year(s) in CUSA-II, having previously recruited (alleged) Big East level talent, USF should be successful. However, once that supply is exhausted and we're back to recruiting CUSA-II talent players, our success is more in doubt (based on the program being what it is and has been)."  ... or words to that effect.

 

Yay or Nay? 

Nay. Charsibb was a little confused, thinking we'd still be in a BE type conference but not being able to pull in BE type talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  257
  • Content Count:  2,408
  • Reputation:   167
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  03/24/2008

I disagree with that statement ....are you saying Gonzaga, Butler, VCU and other programs are not getting high quality players even though they are in much lower conferences

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

I think charsibb is trying to convey is:

 

"given that our first year(s) in CUSA-II, having previously recruited (alleged) Big East level talent, USF should be successful. However, once that supply is exhausted and we're back to recruiting CUSA-II talent players, our success is more in doubt (based on the program being what it is and has been)."  ... or words to that effect.

 

Yay or Nay? 

Nay. Charsibb was a little confused, thinking we'd still be in a BE type conference but not being able to pull in BE type talent.

 

Trip's right, but I agree with Wooly. How's that for confusing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,613
  • Content Count:  74,618
  • Reputation:   10,871
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

I think charsibb is trying to convey is:

 

"given that our first year(s) in CUSA-II, having previously recruited (alleged) Big East level talent, USF should be successful. However, once that supply is exhausted and we're back to recruiting CUSA-II talent players, our success is more in doubt (based on the program being what it is and has been)."  ... or words to that effect.

 

Yay or Nay? 

Nay. Charsibb was a little confused, thinking we'd still be in a BE type conference but not being able to pull in BE type talent.

 

Trip's right, but I agree with Wooly. How's that for confusing?

 

Now answer gruber's post ..... (last time I try to interpret one of your **** posts for somebody)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

I think charsibb is trying to convey is:

 

"given that our first year(s) in CUSA-II, having previously recruited (alleged) Big East level talent, USF should be successful. However, once that supply is exhausted and we're back to recruiting CUSA-II talent players, our success is more in doubt (based on the program being what it is and has been)."  ... or words to that effect.

 

Yay or Nay? 

Nay. Charsibb was a little confused, thinking we'd still be in a BE type conference but not being able to pull in BE type talent.

 

Trip's right, but I agree with Wooly. How's that for confusing?

 

Now answer gruber's post ..... (last time I try to interpret one of your **** posts for somebody)

 

OK, I'll take a shot - because they have a good coach AND they run an uptempo offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,613
  • Content Count:  74,618
  • Reputation:   10,871
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

I think charsibb is trying to convey is:

 

"given that our first year(s) in CUSA-II, having previously recruited (alleged) Big East level talent, USF should be successful. However, once that supply is exhausted and we're back to recruiting CUSA-II talent players, our success is more in doubt (based on the program being what it is and has been)."  ... or words to that effect.

 

Yay or Nay? 

Nay. Charsibb was a little confused, thinking we'd still be in a BE type conference but not being able to pull in BE type talent.

 

Trip's right, but I agree with Wooly. How's that for confusing?

 

Now answer gruber's post ..... (last time I try to interpret one of your **** posts for somebody)

 

OK, I'll take a shot - because they have a good coach AND they run an uptempo offense?

Nay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

 

 

 

I think charsibb is trying to convey is:

 

"given that our first year(s) in CUSA-II, having previously recruited (alleged) Big East level talent, USF should be successful. However, once that supply is exhausted and we're back to recruiting CUSA-II talent players, our success is more in doubt (based on the program being what it is and has been)."  ... or words to that effect.

 

Yay or Nay? 

Nay. Charsibb was a little confused, thinking we'd still be in a BE type conference but not being able to pull in BE type talent.

 

Trip's right, but I agree with Wooly. How's that for confusing?

 

Now answer gruber's post ..... (last time I try to interpret one of your **** posts for somebody)

 

OK, I'll take a shot - because they have a good coach AND they run an uptempo offense?

Nay.

 

Allright then, YOU answer gruber...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,613
  • Content Count:  74,618
  • Reputation:   10,871
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

 

 

 

I think charsibb is trying to convey is:

 

"given that our first year(s) in CUSA-II, having previously recruited (alleged) Big East level talent, USF should be successful. However, once that supply is exhausted and we're back to recruiting CUSA-II talent players, our success is more in doubt (based on the program being what it is and has been)."  ... or words to that effect.

 

Yay or Nay? 

Nay. Charsibb was a little confused, thinking we'd still be in a BE type conference but not being able to pull in BE type talent.

 

Trip's right, but I agree with Wooly. How's that for confusing?

 

Now answer gruber's post ..... (last time I try to interpret one of your **** posts for somebody)

 

OK, I'll take a shot - because they have a good coach AND they run an uptempo offense?

Nay.

 

Allright then, YOU answer gruber...

 

Sheesh.

 

 

I disagree with that statement ....are you saying Gonzaga, Butler, VCU and other programs are not getting high quality players even though they are in much lower conferences

 

Not saying that at all ... and not saying we won't get high quality players when we drop down, but do you think the overall recruiting will be the same in CUSA II as it would have been if the BE was still intact? That's all I'm saying ....

 

Thing, also, is we really didn't have that long of a period recruiting as a member of THE Big East, with the new bells and whistles, so we shouldn't see that big of a drop off. We should, hopefully. do fine in CUSA II in that regard once the gears are shifted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Bull Backers
  • Topic Count:  195
  • Content Count:  6,765
  • Reputation:   856
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  08/01/2000

Neither VCU nor Gonzaga, both small schools, field football teams. 

 

However, when your cornerstone program - in both cases above - is basketball, you're gonna get those recruits (the only game in town).

Butler, however, being in basketball rich Indiana, also enjoys that level of recruit.

 

South Florida - never has been, and I'm willing to bet never will be a dominant basketball program because of multiple reasons  and now

that  football has the spotlight, a losing - or average - U of SF basketball team will not land the recruits that a 'Hoops Heavy' school would. 

 

We are on the fast track to mediocrity...not that there's anything wrong with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

Neither VCU nor Gonzaga, both small schools, field football teams. 

 

However, when your cornerstone program - in both cases above - is basketball, you're gonna get those recruits (the only game in town).

Butler, however, being in basketball rich Indiana, also enjoys that level of recruit.

 

South Florida - never has been, and I'm willing to bet never will be a dominant basketball program because of multiple reasons  and now

that  football has the spotlight, a losing - or average - U of SF basketball team will not land the recruits that a 'Hoops Heavy' school would. 

 

We are on the fast track to mediocrity...not that there's anything wrong with that. 

 

One would have said the same about Miami. And look what they've done in the past weeks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Quotes

    "There is no inherent fear among this group of players. The fear of failing drove the program from day one - the fear of failing the coaches, the fan base, the university, each teammate, themselves. Now, as we head into the biggest game in our history at home on a national stage against the highest ranked team to step on OUR field, the players are taking an introspective look at themselves. Unfortunately, I don't know if they get it. They lack the fear."

    Terry Lucas, 09/26/22  

  • Files

  • Recent Achievements

  • Popular Contributors

  • Quotes

    We've talked about getting back to being the toughest, most violent people out there. Let's be the best version of ourselves and really get back to the culture of how we (USF) used to step across the line and play anybody. Let's hold on to the culture of when they were tough … and they (opponents) knew it was going to be long damn day for themselves.

    Kevin Patrick  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.