Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Re-watched Nevada game


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  108
  • Content Count:  2,484
  • Reputation:   288
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/26/2005

I think the biggest difference in the game was the DT's went from trying to get in the backfield to playing to plug a gap

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,088
  • Content Count:  8,158
  • Reputation:   107
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  02/11/2004

You have to admit that Nevada was like Houdini with that ball for much of the game, at times the camera crew had no idea where the ball went.

This.

Their offense was incredibly deceptive with the ball. Coupled with a QB with great mobility and vision, and it would be difficult for any defense to stop.

That being said, we figured it out just in time. And started putting hats on people when it counted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  554
  • Content Count:  14,407
  • Reputation:   437
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  07/25/2008

I think the biggest difference in the game was the DT's went from trying to get in the backfield to playing to plug a gap

Exactly. Which means that the DTs came out of the gate raring to go. Not always the best strategy as Nevada took advantage of that, knew that USF would come in hot and over pursue and get burned. Which goes to the OP's observations. They did come in ready. What they had to do was figure out what to adjust to that would work, which they did in the second half when they slowed them down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Content Count:  10,565
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  05/14/2005

I liked how much they passed to the TE. It's something we need to do more.

Our D made some adjustments after the first quarter that slowed Nevada down a bit. Still some things that need to be worked on though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  554
  • Content Count:  14,407
  • Reputation:   437
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  07/25/2008

I thought that passing to the TE was a big part of Holtz's offense when he was coming to TE. And Sean Price is a receiving TE. And Landi was moved to TE and can catch. Maybe BJ prefers WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Content Count:  10,565
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  05/14/2005

I thought that passing to the TE was a big part of Holtz's offense when he was coming to TE. And Sean Price is a receiving TE. And Landi was moved to TE and can catch. Maybe BJ prefers WR.

I thought we were going to as well. Price does need to see the field more often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

I thought that passing to the TE was a big part of Holtz's offense when he was coming to TE. And Sean Price is a receiving TE. And Landi was moved to TE and can catch. Maybe BJ prefers WR.

I thought we were going to as well. Price does need to see the field more often.

Why are we in such a hurry to get Price on the field? With our stable of dependable WRs + McFarland and Landi, wouldn't it make more sense to not bring him in unless you have to, maybe eventually getting a redshirt out of him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Content Count:  10,565
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  05/14/2005

I thought that passing to the TE was a big part of Holtz's offense when he was coming to TE. And Sean Price is a receiving TE. And Landi was moved to TE and can catch. Maybe BJ prefers WR.

I thought we were going to as well. Price does need to see the field more often.

Why are we in such a hurry to get Price on the field? With our stable of dependable WRs + McFarland and Landi, wouldn't it make more sense to not bring him in unless you have to, maybe eventually getting a redshirt out of him?

Landi isn't a TE. Price lined up at TE in the first game and did a good job blocking. Not really sold on McFarland. Might as well let Price get his playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  554
  • Content Count:  14,407
  • Reputation:   437
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  07/25/2008

The only reason not to throw to them is they are in the blocking scheme. Which, may be an issue this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  85
  • Content Count:  2,019
  • Reputation:   303
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/22/2011

The defense came out raring to go and it was an overactive defense that was missing the ball carrier from overpursuit.

That seems to have been our problem for the past several years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.