BULLheaded Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 37 Content Count: 1,480 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/08/2002 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Problem is, I realize he's 19 but, if he's still in high school, then most girls there are 16.  What's a boy to do?Hey, I'm don't disagree with you, I just worry about the law or the parents disagreeing with you.If it's 24 that is definately a relief but it certainly wasn't 24 when I was in high school and a student got nailed (no pun intended) for having sex with a girl who was 16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markeymark Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 693 Content Count: 5,550 Reputation: 13 Days Won: 1 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted February 17, 2005 that was the janitor's closet!No wonder they punished him - where was the janitor supposed to go?  We should probably have Carlton talk with Brian Fisher about the perils of that particular activity...Including the advantages of protection!what he did is not illegal... at allPublic nudity, endangering the welfare of a minor, lewd and lacivious...just throwing out some stuff off the top of my head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewbull Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 479 Content Count: 1,991 Reputation: 15 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/04/2002 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Smazza where you @ there are some legal questions on the table your post on this might actually be a nice contribution to the topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdgukhsdgl Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 287 Content Count: 3,078 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/18/2002 Share Posted February 17, 2005 A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this section, "sexual activity" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.(4) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS BATTERY.--A person who:(a) Engages in sexual activity with a person 12 years of age or older but less than 16 years of age;pretty sure the whole "minor" tag expires at 16, dont have time to fish for the rest right nowonly thing they could really go after for with the current info is public nudity, but thats a relatively weak charge. And there may be something regarding school property but there are so many weird school laws I have no idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullDoug Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 469 Content Count: 4,451 Reputation: 52 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/27/2001 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Define "***** fide medical purposes". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
___ Eats It Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,088 Content Count: 8,158 Reputation: 107 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/11/2004 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Under 24 sleeping with 16 or 17 year old, no legal issues.Over 24, legal issues.Hill committed no crime. His only offense was his lack of judgement on WHERE the liaison took place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat99 Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 594 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/16/2002 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Are you saying that in highschool if you had a chance to "get a little" you would have bothered to think about where you are? As a 19-year-old adult, I expect someone to have the very basic moral upbringing to know that having sex IN SCHOOL is wrong. So, yes, I am saying that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zonald Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 116 Content Count: 1,501 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/08/2003 Share Posted February 17, 2005 Under 24 sleeping with 16 or 17 year old, no legal issues.Over 24, legal issues.Hill committed no crime.  His only offense was his lack of judgement on WHERE the liaison took place.Actually, they have every right in the state of Florida to prosecute on this claim.  Mistake is no defense nor is consent in Florida. This is a no tolerance type law, but it looks ok, b/c she was 16. That seems to make a big difference according to the Statute. §§ 800.04(4) and (5), Fla. Stat. (2002).  I don't think they tend to pursue cases whereas the ages as such as involved here.  Hopefully this girl won't think she can get a name for herself and decide to press charges.  That would be bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mag Pie Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 59 Content Count: 2,307 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/09/2003 Share Posted February 17, 2005 I believe that that law was passed recently. My friend is in the police academy and he told me about it... I still think under 18 is sorta sketchy, but you gotta do what you gotta do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Reaper Posted February 17, 2005 Group: Member Topic Count: 114 Content Count: 2,052 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/06/2002 Share Posted February 17, 2005 It probably was the girls fault!!! ;D ( sorry! just joshin!!!!) It cetainly takes 2 to tango. Both were at fault and made a bad decision! Somebody from USF needs to get to this kid and straighten out his act NOW before he committs further indiscretions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now