USF turned down a 2 for 1 with Texas.....

[flsportsfan83]

1 for 1 with Miami or a 2 for 1 with Texas? I'll take the 1 for 1. Wollard is the man.

[bullman3]

Who says we don't need 2 for 1's? We havent ever really taken 2 for 1's anyway, we always were stuck just doing a one game payday.  I don't remember any 2 for 1 games.  We are not at the level yet to be able to sign 1 for 1 games with the tops teams like texas.  We are beyond the 1 game pay days but arent to the point of demanding 1for 1s either.  DW continues to make bad decisions on what's best for usf.  A game in Austin would have been awesome and having a team like texas playing in Tampa, would be even more awesome.  Talk about publicity, that game would easily sellout.  What a shame that UCF will benefit from this instead of us.   We should not pass up an oppotunity like this.

[lotsofbull99]

We need winnable out of conference games.  One day when we can compete with the likes of texas then go ahead and schedule them.

[Velcro]

We aren't at the level to sign 1 for 1's?  ummm we just did...

UM twice, UNC as well.. seems like we are doing exactly what you say we can't do.

[lotsofbull99]

I like our KState style scheduling

[Velcro]

I like our KState style scheduling

I don't think we've ever had 8 home games

[Joe]

I said it yesterday, as long as this is a staggered 2 for 1 it would be good. We need to play and BEAT a team like this to help our national poisitioning. Yes, we got one with Miami, but their home attendance speaks for their willingness to play on the road.

UNC and Kansas are two bottom feeders in their conferences.

Lets see some gonads on the schedule, it won't hurt out BCS chances. We can still win our conference and I seriously doubt we're getting an at large bid. It will only make our team tougher.

(For those that will come back with last year's schedule, it was made when we were still young D-IAA and D-I. We have said we won't do one shot deals again.)

[bulls96go]

It's better to get the chance to beat (and possibly lose to) a nationaly ranked team on ESPN, rather that beat a nobody team with no TV coverage.

Now more than ever we need to take the risks...  

"(Bull)    Balls to the wall people!!!"

really?!?!

and screw your schedule to create a crisis every year?

we are now BCS, we have unc, UM, kansas with one to one's , we have UF as a payday game so taking that risk is not worth it IMHO.

woolard is trying to get us a good mix of games some with legit chances to win to help our image, signing up for a slaugter twice is not nessasry

woolard is also tring to get our schedule regulated and smooth in the future, i am sure JL has a lot to say about that.

finally we do not recuit in texas and there are not a stadium full of texas alums in tampa, so only marginal gain from this 2 fot 1 deal.

[smazza]

Woolard is doing a diservice to the USF fans and should grow a set and stand up to Leavitt.

agreed

what a stupid decision not to play national chumpians

i almost cant believe it!!!!!!!!!!!! 8)

[smazza]

mutt and smazza agree

you dont turn down a deal to play texAS.