Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  155
  • Content Count:  5,249
  • Reputation:   342
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/09/2007

im sure this has already been posted & discussed but FSU getting screwed & heading to the SEC is the best thing that could have happened to USF…

 

IMG_6225.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  12,641
  • Reputation:   3,327
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  10/16/2017

40 minutes ago, TRUTH D. Antagonist said:

im sure this has already been posted & discussed but FSU getting screwed & heading to the SEC is the best thing that could have happened to USF…

 

IMG_6225.jpeg

IF the SEC invites them, I imagine they invite one more team to even out  the numbers. I think it would UNC over Clemson because they already have  South carolina in the state of SC and don't have a team in NC. If they get UNC they strengthen basketball, get into the NC market, and add a  consistenent top 25-50 team to  further strength the conference top to bottom. If they add  SC, UNC, FSU, and Clemson then they would make virtually impossible for the B1g to ever catch up locking down the best areas of the nation for football. 

Outside of FSU and Clemson there are not current powerhouse programs competing for titles or playoff spots. Miami,  NC, NC State,GT, Louisville, VT, Virginia, Duke, WF,  PITT, BC ,SY, Stanford, Cal , SMU, and the others would be in the same place the b12 is going to be without a true power team to prop the conference up. California and Stanford don't really help the ACC for football at all. I

Edited by Outlaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Content Count:  3,417
  • Reputation:   1,193
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/09/2010

Didn't all the schools have to sign/agree to the GOR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  12,641
  • Reputation:   3,327
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  10/16/2017

6 minutes ago, Sk00b said:

Didn't all the schools have to sign/agree to the GOR?

I believe so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Content Count:  3,417
  • Reputation:   1,193
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/09/2010

I guess yall are just posting the fact they are having a meeting. That said, assuming they signed the contract, boo ******* hooo. Either get out the check book or honor the contract.

Edited by Sk00b
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  12,641
  • Reputation:   3,327
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  10/16/2017

I am surprised they just haven't identified as a SEC team yet to the break the ACC GOR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  1,834
  • Content Count:  5,491
  • Reputation:   1,808
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  12/02/2018

29 minutes ago, Sk00b said:

I guess yall are just posting the fact they are having a meeting. That said, assuming they signed the contract, boo ******* hooo. Either get out the check book or honor the contract.

The meeting is to formally move forward with legal action to get a judicial interpretation of the contract - which is not necessarily binding on future courts (as I understand the process).  Basically, they are asking a court what their options are.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  23
  • Content Count:  6,181
  • Reputation:   1,442
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  11/12/2011

Whoops wrong thread 

Edited by Rex Havoc
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,332
  • Content Count:  97,087
  • Reputation:   10,859
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

2 hours ago, Jim Johnson said:

The meeting is to formally move forward with legal action to get a judicial interpretation of the contract - which is not necessarily binding on future courts (as I understand the process).  Basically, they are asking a court what their options are.

If I am FSU, I show the judge the video of the USF/Cuse game.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  64
  • Content Count:  9,756
  • Reputation:   2,174
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  09/20/2014

FSU is looking like a bunch of whiny *******. If they really feel like the only way for them to prosper or show how big their manhood is is to go to the SEC I wish them success in their next endeavor. But it looks like greed and a knee jerk reaction 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.