NewEnglandBull Posted August 16, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted August 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Brad said: I would like SDSU because it would be easy to see a game. But I can’t think “Brad first”. No. It’s USF & UCF first! It they could pull SDSU off it would be nice. Taking Boise with them puts the MWC out of business for NYD game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted August 16, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,269 Reputation: 6,152 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted August 16, 2020 1 minute ago, Brad said: I would like SDSU because it would be easy to see a game. But I can’t think “Brad first”. No. It’s USF & UCF first! Thank G-d we decided to get rid of CJL who was holding us back from our inevitable coupling, I do not where we would be today if we did not finally agree to be a package deal with UCF and really lock down the I-4 corridor 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
206BULL Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 66 Content Count: 4,778 Reputation: 901 Days Won: 6 Joined: 08/30/2009 Share Posted August 17, 2020 3 hours ago, Brad said: I would like SDSU because it would be easy to see a game. But I can’t think “Brad first”. No. It’s USF & UCF first! The drive to Vegas can’t be that much longer than SD. My new seats are already behind the away bench so I’m ready for the UNLV addition to the AAC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcgruber Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 257 Content Count: 2,408 Reputation: 168 Days Won: 5 Joined: 03/24/2008 Share Posted August 17, 2020 all are to far especialy with whats going on, Uconn couldn't make it in our conference and thats a lot less travel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted August 17, 2020 8 hours ago, bcgruber said: all are to far especialy with whats going on, Uconn couldn't make it in our conference and thats a lot less travel They can be placed in divisions and it could work. Uconn leaving had nothing to do with travel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted August 17, 2020 On 8/15/2020 at 8:17 PM, NewEnglandBull said: if it is just for this season pass it depends on the schools Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted August 17, 2020 13 hours ago, Brad said: I would like SDSU because it would be easy to see a game. But I can’t think “Brad first”. No. It’s USF & UCF first! sdsu would be good for me why dont we merge both conferences? take em all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mission9 Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 60 Content Count: 4,078 Reputation: 469 Days Won: 2 Joined: 12/09/2003 Share Posted August 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, smazza said: sdsu would be good for me why dont we merge both conferences? take em all I agree with this in general for the future. For now, do you think Newsome would allow San Diego St. to play at all at home (with or sans fans) or would they have to play all of the games on the road? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mission9 Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 60 Content Count: 4,078 Reputation: 469 Days Won: 2 Joined: 12/09/2003 Share Posted August 17, 2020 (edited) 16 minutes ago, smazza said: if it is just for this season pass it depends on the schools I tend to agree one season would not be beneficial. Even so, I have considered the other side. If you make these teams feel at home (without kissing their butts) and welcome in the conference and things go well, it might be worth a shot to get them to see the benefits of a merger or partial merger. Edited August 17, 2020 by Mission9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsbucsfan426 Posted August 17, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 129 Content Count: 3,116 Reputation: 473 Days Won: 7 Joined: 11/28/2010 Share Posted August 17, 2020 If it was Boise, BYU, and Air Force, I would do it. Boise and BYU's deals are already close to the AAC contract and Air Force would likely value up as every school would be able to get a military appreciation game every other year. They haven't been willing to join, but if it means being left out in the cold...I think BYU and Boise would do it. Boise's problem is that they pretty much dominate the MWC most years-so they would probably lose some profile if they moved to the AAC. If the AAC is the only path to a NY6 every year they will join. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now