Sk00b Posted January 12, 2020 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 3,417 Reputation: 1,193 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/09/2010 Share Posted January 12, 2020 53 minutes ago, puc86 said: No you heard from some people that it is not in USF’s best interest mostly because it is not in USF’s best interest. It is USF's best and most interest in years outside of this board! Not sure I get your logic here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted January 12, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted January 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Sk00b said: It is USF's best and most interest in years outside of this board! Not sure I get your logic here He has no logic...just consistency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted January 12, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,272 Reputation: 6,158 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted January 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Sk00b said: It is USF's best and most interest in years outside of this board! Not sure I get your logic here Just that while I can see the benefit to CJS and Clemson it is at best a net neutral to us and we would be better off having a coach. I don’t think it’s the worst possible thing for us it only seems that way because people have convinced themselves this is somehow great, it’s not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted January 12, 2020 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 583 Content Count: 22,723 Reputation: 5,862 Days Won: 109 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted January 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said: He has no logic...just consistency Not sure about the consistent part unless consistently inconsistent. He does hold true on CJL though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sk00b Posted January 12, 2020 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 3,417 Reputation: 1,193 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/09/2010 Share Posted January 12, 2020 1 minute ago, puc86 said: Just that while I can see the benefit to CJS and Clemson it is at best a net neutral to us and we would be better off having a coach. I don’t think it’s the worst possible thing for us it only seems that way because people have convinced themselves this is somehow great, it’s not. I believe we got the best possible scenario for success. Does that mean it will come to fruition? Nope, but I'll take my chances with a championship coach from arguably the best program in the nation. He sure as hell better be able to lead the staff (remotley) he hired in his absence... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted January 12, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,272 Reputation: 6,158 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted January 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Sk00b said: I believe we got the best possible scenario for success. Does that mean it will come to fruition? Nope, but I'll take my chances with a championship coach from arguably the best program in the nation. He sure as hell better be able to lead the staff (remotley) he hired in his absence... No one is arguing that he can’t just that USF would be best served by him focusing on USF, it’s not a hot take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sk00b Posted January 12, 2020 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 3,417 Reputation: 1,193 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/09/2010 Share Posted January 12, 2020 1 minute ago, puc86 said: No one is arguing that he can’t just that USF would be best served by him focusing on USF, it’s not a hot take. Maybe he is scouting LSU 4th string talent for the portal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted January 12, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,272 Reputation: 6,158 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted January 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Sk00b said: Maybe he is scouting LSU 4th string talent for the portal. Maybe but we would still be best served by this being a full time job instead of a part time one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sk00b Posted January 12, 2020 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 19 Content Count: 3,417 Reputation: 1,193 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/09/2010 Share Posted January 12, 2020 Luckily, it will be after they lose to LSU. I still believe it doesn't matter at this point. Not much to coach up that is going to change next year during this time period. But, you may be right if we lose to BCC. Then I will never question you again lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted January 12, 2020 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,736 Reputation: 10,960 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted January 12, 2020 50 minutes ago, puc86 said: Just that while I can see the benefit to CJS and Clemson it is at best a net neutral to us and we would be better off having a coach. We have 11 of them ........... but I'm sure since the boss isn't there, the scene at the football offices in the Selmon look something like this: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now