Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

"Power 5" teams with less players on NFL rosters.


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  173
  • Content Count:  7,000
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  06/11/2010

USF has 19. 

 

Wake Forest: 12

Duke: 9

Syracuse: 16

Indiana: 9

Louisville: 17

Vanderbilt: 15

Iowa State: 13

Minnesota: 8

Kansas: 11

Colorado: 14

Texas Tech: 16

Baylor:18

TCU: 17

Washington: 16

Washington State: 9

 

TIE:

Mississippi State: 19

 

Again, my point is there is nothing special about the Power 5 label. It's not an opinion, it's a fact: USF has placed NFL talent better than these programs. USF can and will compete with these schools, regardless of the label people give them and give us. 

 

Happy Friday.

 

source

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Content Count:  1,913
  • Reputation:   58
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  08/12/2004

That's true in June, yes. Might not have the same advantage in September.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,898
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

 ridiculous stat

 

 

power 5 numbers will grow

 

and gap between the halves and have nots will grow

 

wonder why usf couldnt win with all that talent

 

 

THE POWER 5 LABEL MEANS FINANCIAL SECURITY

 

NO POWER 5 LABEL MEANS MINOR LEAGUE

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,898
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

USF has 19. 

 

Wake Forest: 12

Duke: 9

Syracuse: 16

Indiana: 9

Louisville: 17

Vanderbilt: 15

Iowa State: 13

Minnesota: 8

Kansas: 11

Colorado: 14

Texas Tech: 16

Baylor:18

TCU: 17

Washington: 16

Washington State: 9

 

TIE:

Mississippi State: 19

 

Again, my point is there is nothing special about the Power 5 label. It's not an opinion, it's a fact: USF has placed NFL talent better than these programs. USF can and will compete with these schools, regardless of the label people give them and give us. 

 

Happy Friday.

 

source

THERE WAS NO POWER 5  when these numbers were tabulated

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,615
  • Content Count:  74,673
  • Reputation:   10,892
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

USF has 19. 

 

Wake Forest: 12

Duke: 9

Syracuse: 16

Indiana: 9

Louisville: 17

Vanderbilt: 15

Iowa State: 13

Minnesota: 8

Kansas: 11

Colorado: 14

Texas Tech: 16

Baylor:18

TCU: 17

Washington: 16

Washington State: 9

 

TIE:

Mississippi State: 19

 

Again, my point is there is nothing special about the Power 5 label. It's not an opinion, it's a fact: USF has placed NFL talent better than these programs. USF can and will compete with these schools, regardless of the label people give them and give us. 

 

Happy Friday.

 

source

 

Actually, that is an opinion ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  44
  • Content Count:  1,705
  • Reputation:   221
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  01/25/2013

What time period is that? is that all time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

We all know that there are teams in the Power 5 conferences that wouldn't be if they were to pick them today, but they are not going to kick them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

We all know that there are teams in the Power 5 conferences that wouldn't be if they were to pick them today, but they are not going to kick them out.

...or are they after these numbers go public?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

We all know that there are teams in the Power 5 conferences that wouldn't be if they were to pick them today, but they are not going to kick them out.

...or are they after these numbers go public?

Wishin' and hopin'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Quotes

    "I know we are not completely out of the woods yet, but we feel like we can see the light at the end of the tunnel"

    Jeff Scott  

  • Files

  • Recent Achievements

    • Rage earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Seminolebull earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Seminolebull earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Ken Kistner earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BigSteve went up a rank
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

  • Quotes

    “In my mind, I’m kind of like, ‘OK, excuses over'. We know what we need to do. We’ve got the right team together, and now we move forward, and we’ll evaluate and be accountable to each other, including myself, from this point forward.”

    Michael Kelly  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.