Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

"Power 5" teams with less players on NFL rosters.


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  173
  • Content Count:  7,003
  • Reputation:   2,260
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  06/11/2010

USF has 19. 

 

Wake Forest: 12

Duke: 9

Syracuse: 16

Indiana: 9

Louisville: 17

Vanderbilt: 15

Iowa State: 13

Minnesota: 8

Kansas: 11

Colorado: 14

Texas Tech: 16

Baylor:18

TCU: 17

Washington: 16

Washington State: 9

 

TIE:

Mississippi State: 19

 

Again, my point is there is nothing special about the Power 5 label. It's not an opinion, it's a fact: USF has placed NFL talent better than these programs. USF can and will compete with these schools, regardless of the label people give them and give us. 

 

Happy Friday.

 

source

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Content Count:  1,913
  • Reputation:   58
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  08/12/2004

That's true in June, yes. Might not have the same advantage in September.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,898
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

 ridiculous stat

 

 

power 5 numbers will grow

 

and gap between the halves and have nots will grow

 

wonder why usf couldnt win with all that talent

 

 

THE POWER 5 LABEL MEANS FINANCIAL SECURITY

 

NO POWER 5 LABEL MEANS MINOR LEAGUE

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,898
  • Content Count:  66,091
  • Reputation:   2,434
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

USF has 19. 

 

Wake Forest: 12

Duke: 9

Syracuse: 16

Indiana: 9

Louisville: 17

Vanderbilt: 15

Iowa State: 13

Minnesota: 8

Kansas: 11

Colorado: 14

Texas Tech: 16

Baylor:18

TCU: 17

Washington: 16

Washington State: 9

 

TIE:

Mississippi State: 19

 

Again, my point is there is nothing special about the Power 5 label. It's not an opinion, it's a fact: USF has placed NFL talent better than these programs. USF can and will compete with these schools, regardless of the label people give them and give us. 

 

Happy Friday.

 

source

THERE WAS NO POWER 5  when these numbers were tabulated

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,615
  • Content Count:  74,694
  • Reputation:   10,909
  • Days Won:  424
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

USF has 19. 

 

Wake Forest: 12

Duke: 9

Syracuse: 16

Indiana: 9

Louisville: 17

Vanderbilt: 15

Iowa State: 13

Minnesota: 8

Kansas: 11

Colorado: 14

Texas Tech: 16

Baylor:18

TCU: 17

Washington: 16

Washington State: 9

 

TIE:

Mississippi State: 19

 

Again, my point is there is nothing special about the Power 5 label. It's not an opinion, it's a fact: USF has placed NFL talent better than these programs. USF can and will compete with these schools, regardless of the label people give them and give us. 

 

Happy Friday.

 

source

 

Actually, that is an opinion ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  44
  • Content Count:  1,705
  • Reputation:   221
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  01/25/2013

What time period is that? is that all time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,586
  • Content Count:  23,185
  • Reputation:   2,332
  • Days Won:  65
  • Joined:  09/05/2002

We all know that there are teams in the Power 5 conferences that wouldn't be if they were to pick them today, but they are not going to kick them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  152
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

We all know that there are teams in the Power 5 conferences that wouldn't be if they were to pick them today, but they are not going to kick them out.

...or are they after these numbers go public?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

We all know that there are teams in the Power 5 conferences that wouldn't be if they were to pick them today, but they are not going to kick them out.

...or are they after these numbers go public?

Wishin' and hopin'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Quotes

    "They picked us at the bottom. We're trying to get to the top. We're looking forward to the future, not backward.''

    Vincent Davis, USF JR. DB  

  • Files

  • Recent Achievements

    • itsbrewinatmcewen earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Rage earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Seminolebull earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Seminolebull earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Ken Kistner earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

  • Quotes

    We've talked about getting back to being the toughest, most violent people out there. Let's be the best version of ourselves and really get back to the culture of how we (USF) used to step across the line and play anybody. Let's hold on to the culture of when they were tough … and they (opponents) knew it was going to be long damn day for themselves.

    Kevin Patrick  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.