NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted February 20, 2013 We are actually having conversations about USF having back to back undefeated seasons? This board has its moments of delusion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted February 20, 2013 the landscape is sure changing fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Could be some good dominoes that fall. But could still end up screwing us over if things go a certain way. If B1G adds UNC and UVA, they'll have 16 members. SEC may go ahead and take VT and NC State to get 16. At that point, ACC and Big 12 have options and can fight over Notre Dame. If that happens, there could be and should be room at the table for USF, as well as UConn and UC - just depends who wins the fight and if we end up with a beat up ACC that only has to add a few schools, or an obliterated ACC that is essentially the Big East's 2013 lineup plus BC and one or two other leftovers... The Pac 12 could intervene and take their final shot at the Big 12 schools. If the Big 12 can't get after the FSU/Miami/GT/Clemson core, the Pac 12 may see it as an opportunity to go after the coup. Pac 12 could add TX, TX Tech, OU, and OK State. It would surely help the Pac split into east and west with UCLA and USC in the west with the current six north division schools and the four Big 12 teams would join the Arizona duo, Utah, and Colorado as an East contingent, and really strengthen the Pac 12's reach from Texas to the Pacific ocean. It would also solve the Pac 12's issues of considering lesser schools like SDSU or Boise State, and there's still no way BYU and their religious affiliation ever gets mentioned with the Pac 12 in the same sentence again. If that were to happen, there would be six Big 12 schools left, and ten ACC schools left...without ND in the mix....merger. And that could make the 4th power conference and essentially lock everyone else on the outside for good. Then it comes down to the Big East's current lineup fighting with the MWC over C-USA and MAC scraps. This is all assuming that sixteen is the magic number between greed and product dilution. I think you're right. In fact, the more I think about this, the more I think it's already done. There are 64 teams ALREADY in the Power 5, plus ND. I don't think they're going to take any more teams from the lower divisions. I think they'll include ND as a football independent somehow, perhaps in a similar way to how they use to share bowls with the old Big East (and maaaaaybe BYU gets a similar arrangement, but I doubt it) If they're going to promote one of the "lesser 5" up to the "Power 5" then they're going to have to relegate someone to make room. I don't see that happening. The B12 and the ACC will end up merging after the B1G, SEC, and PAC are done picking their bones. And NONE of them are going to get relegated. Not Wake, not Baylor, not Iowa State, and certainly not Northwestern or Vandy. Face it folks, we are already on the outside, and it's time to be the Champion of the Lesser 5, 'cause we ain't never gettin' called up to the bigs now. Power 5 01 IND Notre Dame (4) 02 ACC Boston College 03 ACC Clemson (11) 04 ACC Duke 05 ACC Florida State (10) 06 ACC Georgia Tech 07 ACC Louisville (13) 08 ACC Miami (FL) 09 ACC North Carolina 10 ACC North Carolina State 11 ACC Pittsburgh 12 ACC Syracuse 13 ACC Virginia 14 ACC Virginia Tech 15 ACC Wake Forest 16 B12 Baylor 17 B12 Iowa State 18 B12 Kansas 19 B12 Kansas State (12) 20 B12 Oklahoma (15) 21 B12 Oklahoma State 22 B12 TCU 23 B12 Texas (19) 24 B12 Texas Tech 25 B12 West Virginia 26 B1G Illinois 27 B1G Indiana 28 B1G Iowa 29 B1G Maryland 30 B1G Michigan (24) 31 B1G Michigan State 32 B1G Minnesota 33 B1G Nebraska (25) 34 B1G Northwestern (17) 35 B1G Ohio State (3) 36 B1G Penn State 37 B1G Purdue 38 B1G Rutgers 39 B1G Wisconsin 40 PAC Arizona 41 PAC Arizona State 42 PAC California 43 PAC Colorado 44 PAC Oregon (2) 45 PAC Oregon State (20) 46 PAC Stanford (7) 47 PAC UCLA 48 PAC USC 49 PAC Utah 50 PAC Washington 51 PAC Washington State 52 SEC Alabama (1) 53 SEC Arkansas 54 SEC Auburn 55 SEC Florida (9) 56 SEC Georgia (5) 57 SEC Kentucky 58 SEC LSU (14) 59 SEC Mississippi 60 SEC Mississippi State 61 SEC Missouri 62 SEC South Carolina (8) 63 SEC Tennessee 64 SEC Texas A&M (5) 65 SEC Vanderbilt (23) Lesser 5 01 IND Army 02 IND Brigham Young 03 BE Cincinnati 04 BE Connecticut 05 BE East Carolina 06 BE Houston 07 BE Memphis 08 BE Navy 09 BE South Florida 10 BE Southern Methodist 11 BE Temple 12 BE Tulane 13 BE UCF 14 CUSA FAU 15 CUSA FIU 16 CUSA LaTech 17 CUSA Marshall 18 CUSA MTSU 19 CUSA ODU 20 CUSA Rice 21 CUSA Southern Miss 22 CUSA Tulsa 23 CUSA UAB 24 CUSA UNCC 25 CUSA UNT 26 CUSA UTEP 27 CUSA UTSA 28 MAC Akron 29 MAC Ball State 30 MAC Bowling Green 31 MAC Buffalo 32 MAC Central Michigan 33 MAC Eastern Michigan 34 MAC Kent State 35 MAC Massachusetts 36 MAC Miami (OH) 37 MAC Northern Illinois (22) 38 MAC Ohio 39 MAC Toledo 40 MAC Western Michigan 41 MWC Air Force 42 MWC Boise State (18) 43 MWC Colorado State 44 MWC Fresno State 45 MWC Hawaii 46 MWC Nevada 47 MWC New Mexico 48 MWC San Diego State 49 MWC UNLV 50 MWC Wyoming 51 SBC Arkansas State 52 SBC FIU 53 SBC Florida Atlantic 54 SBC Louisiana-Lafayette 55 SBC Louisiana-Monroe 56 SBC Middle Tennessee 57 SBC North Texas 58 SBC South Alabama 59 SBC Troy 60 SBC Western Kentucky judy and ad should be fired if after the dust settles usf is outside the club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2000bull Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 83 Content Count: 7,048 Reputation: 641 Days Won: 11 Joined: 06/04/2009 Share Posted February 20, 2013 We are actually having conversations about USF having back to back undefeated seasons? This board has its moments of delusion. I don't think it's really a conversation as much as it's him saying in order for us to make it to a NC, we'd have to have back-to-back undefeated seasons....which is probably right. Besides it's off-season, you had to know it would come up, just like conf. realignment and probably an OCS thread will show up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Martin Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 148 Content Count: 8,044 Reputation: 228 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/23/2005 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 judy and ad should be fired if after the dust settles usf is outside the club The academic profile of the school is improving, so I'm not mad at Judy, but if we don't make it Woolard should be sacked. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I intend to see CWT tonight at the Governor's Club in Tallahassee. Maybe I'll ask him why he believes USF can win a championship given our conference situation. Am I the only one that has figured out that when he says we will win "championships", he is including conference championships? That's what I've thought the entire time. Is it POSSIBLE that we can win an NC, yes, is it even remotely probable? Not so much. I specifically asked him about winning a national championship today. He didn't hesitate. He didn't qualify. He didn't bat an eye. He immediately said yes. However, he agreed with me that we'd have to go undefeated in whatever conference we're in just to have a shot in the playoff system. So, I think he equates winning conference championships with the possibility of winning a national championship. Not sure what more we can ask for. Let's get our first 10 win season in ANY conference. Then we can talk. He was definitely talking about national championship in the interviews/speeches when he was first hired ... I'm going to get picky. He definitely said that we could win a national championship here. Since then, he has constantly talked about winning CHAMIONSHIPS, plural. He has referenced the conference a lot, and he has had T-Shirts made talking about winning the Big East. Taggart is a really smart guy. He's playing the semantic game. Yes, we can win a national championship. No, he doesn't expect us to win one any time soon. He does want to instill a winning culture. When he speaks of winning "championships", he is clearly talking about conference championships. You have to crawl before you can walk, before you can run. He isn't thinking about national championships at the moment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm101 Posted February 20, 2013 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 173 Content Count: 7,008 Reputation: 2,261 Days Won: 12 Joined: 06/11/2010 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I have no problem talking NC, but in the right context. I feel a little jaded and just cross my fingers that we win our conference one day. But... It is possible that Boise State beats a strong Ole Miss and BYU team in 2014, goes undefeated in conference (with decent Fresno and Utah St. teams), and wins their conf champ game, and gets in the top 4 for the playoff. Cincy in 2014 plays Ohio State, and the current BE lineup (and potential conf champ game). Same story. We truly have to be a bully and truly elbow our way there with hard-fought wins and FAN participation (a home presence). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltoBull Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 35 Content Count: 490 Reputation: 13 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/19/2006 Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) Could be some good dominoes that fall. But could still end up screwing us over if things go a certain way. If B1G adds UNC and UVA, they'll have 16 members. SEC may go ahead and take VT and NC State to get 16. At that point, ACC and Big 12 have options and can fight over Notre Dame. If that happens, there could be and should be room at the table for USF, as well as UConn and UC - just depends who wins the fight and if we end up with a beat up ACC that only has to add a few schools, or an obliterated ACC that is essentially the Big East's 2013 lineup plus BC and one or two other leftovers... The Pac 12 could intervene and take their final shot at the Big 12 schools. If the Big 12 can't get after the FSU/Miami/GT/Clemson core, the Pac 12 may see it as an opportunity to go after the coup. Pac 12 could add TX, TX Tech, OU, and OK State. It would surely help the Pac split into east and west with UCLA and USC in the west with the current six north division schools and the four Big 12 teams would join the Arizona duo, Utah, and Colorado as an East contingent, and really strengthen the Pac 12's reach from Texas to the Pacific ocean. It would also solve the Pac 12's issues of considering lesser schools like SDSU or Boise State, and there's still no way BYU and their religious affiliation ever gets mentioned with the Pac 12 in the same sentence again. If that were to happen, there would be six Big 12 schools left, and ten ACC schools left...without ND in the mix....merger. And that could make the 4th power conference and essentially lock everyone else on the outside for good. Then it comes down to the Big East's current lineup fighting with the MWC over C-USA and MAC scraps. This is all assuming that sixteen is the magic number between greed and product dilution. I think you're right. In fact, the more I think about this, the more I think it's already done. There are 64 teams ALREADY in the Power 5, plus ND. I don't think they're going to take any more teams from the lower divisions. I think they'll include ND as a football independent somehow, perhaps in a similar way to how they use to share bowls with the old Big East (and maaaaaybe BYU gets a similar arrangement, but I doubt it) If they're going to promote one of the "lesser 5" up to the "Power 5" then they're going to have to relegate someone to make room. I don't see that happening. The B12 and the ACC will end up merging after the B1G, SEC, and PAC are done picking their bones. And NONE of them are going to get relegated. Not Wake, not Baylor, not Iowa State, and certainly not Northwestern or Vandy. Face it folks, we are already on the outside, and it's time to be the Champion of the Lesser 5, 'cause we ain't never gettin' called up to the bigs now. A voice of reason. I will be happy when all of the nonsense is done, the rest of us will finally realized the door has been slammed shut in our face and we can move on. I really do prefer the idea of being reasonably near the top of the Go5 than perennially near the bottom of the 'power' 5. Edited February 20, 2013 by BaltoBull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hem Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,663 Reputation: 401 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted February 20, 2013 ACC or bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted February 20, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Share Posted February 20, 2013 The ACC isn't going anywhere. I mean who in their right mind would take Wake Forest? And the whole NCSU to SEC is delusional as well. You have to consider it on a team-by-team or conf-by-conf basis. No way these conferences get along well enough to devise some rational grand plan. No effing way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now