Hem Posted December 18, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,663 Reputation: 401 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 All I'm saying is: USF + Taggart + B12 conference = great possibilities Cue Bull94 to tell us how bad the travel would suck in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... I wouldn't give a **** if we got invited to the Pac-12. ANY power 5 is better than this conference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted December 18, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted December 18, 2012 All I'm saying is: USF + Taggart + B12 conference = great possibilities Cue Bull94 to tell us how bad the travel would suck in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... I wouldn't give a **** if we got invited to the Pac-12. ANY power 5 is better than this conference. ABSOLUTLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted December 18, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted December 18, 2012 All I'm saying is: USF + Taggart + B12 conference = great possibilities Cue Bull94 to tell us how bad the travel would suck in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... I wouldn't give a **** if we got invited to the Pac-12. ANY power 5 is better than this conference. ABSOLUTLY Travel would suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvwvu Posted December 19, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 7 Content Count: 820 Reputation: 5 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/14/2011 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I dont understand why USF would be opposed to Pac because travel sucks, even in old Big East USF had to fly for everything. Hell with WVU you had to fly into Pitt and then drive 2 hours south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted December 19, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I could care less... just GTFO out of this mess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigStormBrewing Posted December 19, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 17 Content Count: 370 Reputation: 8 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/25/2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) Uncle, Uncle, Uncle! Edited December 19, 2012 by BigStormBrewing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted December 19, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I dont understand why USF would be opposed to Pac because travel sucks, even in old Big East USF had to fly for everything. Hell with WVU you had to fly into Pitt and then drive 2 hours south. I'm glad we had a chance to play at the BE level of competition and collect BE level payouts, but we didn't belong there either. Our true home is the ACC, we just have to figure out a way to make them believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted December 19, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted December 19, 2012 I dont understand why USF would be opposed to Pac because travel sucks, even in old Big East USF had to fly for everything. Hell with WVU you had to fly into Pitt and then drive 2 hours south. I'm glad we had a chance to play at the BE level of competition and collect BE level payouts, but we didn't belong there either. Our true home is the ACC, we just have to figure out a way to make them believe it. ACC would be easier to travel to games... I can see in 3 years or so that the ACC will be the Big East 2.0 +/- a few teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoolyBully Posted December 19, 2012 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 194 Content Count: 6,785 Reputation: 864 Days Won: 3 Joined: 08/01/2000 Share Posted December 19, 2012 As long as we're wallowing in the fantasy mud... Let's s'pose USF does manage to find itself in the ACC. Then the B5 decide that B4 is a much better deal and the ACC is outside looking in. Are you still content with being in the ACC, or is the real bottom line nut that you think USF should be seated with the movers and shakers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted December 19, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Two ways to answer that: 1. Green and Gold goggles say movers and shakers so we are in a position to capitalize on a good year 2. Reality, we have done nothing to prove we belong with the movers and shakers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now