Who'sYourData? Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Seems to have been speaking in general termssnd not to a specific recruit so if recruits do post their decisions here the ncaa could not prove it was because his comment maybe they just wanted to don't think the ncaa would persue something as ambiguous as that. It would be a good way to establish a relationship with the fans as long as they post on their own accord Yeah, but if there is even the hint of a possible recruiting violation it is something to steer clear of. Until there is clear direction from the NCAA, it is far more prudent to play it safe and not get USF in trouble over something minor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Author Share Posted July 15, 2012 Under the definition of booster, my guess is the majority of this board qualifies. Definitely the owner of this board is a booster. Doubt you could coordinate a kid to announce his decision on this board without running afoul of the NCAA rules for contact. That means all the paysites and newspapers( both filled with boosters) are currently violating NCAA rules. This is a ridiculous argument. The kids can announce their decisions wherever they please. The have been doing it forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,640 Reputation: 10,878 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Seems to have been speaking in general termssnd not to a specific recruit so if recruits do post their decisions here the ncaa could not prove it was because his comment maybe they just wanted to don't think the ncaa would persue something as ambiguous as that. It would be a good way to establish a relationship with the fans as long as they post on their own accord The invitation wasn't the problem. The problem COULD be if an unsigned recruit came on here and announced, then interacted with those here, most of whom are considered USF athletics representatives. All I said was that he should maybe check with someone to make sure it wouldn't be a problem. From the Bulls Club website http://www.mybullscl...hould-know.aspx : What are the general rules regarding recruiting and boosters? Boosters are prohibited from involvement in recruiting prospective student-athletes. A prospective student-athlete is anyone who has started seventh grade classes for men's basketball, or ninth grade classes for all other sports. Boosters should contact USF Athletics staff about any questions in this regard, and refrain from attempting to contact any prospect or to influence his or her decision to attend USF. Such contact includes activity on Facebook or other social networking sites. Please contact the USF Athletics Compliance staff with any questions about rules governing booster contact with prospective or current student-athletes and their family and friends: Steve Horton, Associate Athletics Director: (813) 974-6858 Horton@usf.edu Rick Stumpf, Assistant Athletics Director, Compliance: (813) 974-4061 RStumpf@usf.edu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Does this include contact with a recruit's parents in said social networking site? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,640 Reputation: 10,878 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Does this include contact with a recruit's parents in said social networking site? I couldn't find anything about that being taboo.... as long as we're not giving him bags of money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubledown Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 423 Reputation: 24 Days Won: 1 Joined: 03/01/2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Seems to have been speaking in general termssnd not to a specific recruit so if recruits do post their decisions here the ncaa could not prove it was because his comment maybe they just wanted to don't think the ncaa would persue something as ambiguous as that. It would be a good way to establish a relationship with the fans as long as they post on their own accord The invitation wasn't the problem. The problem COULD be if an unsigned recruit came on here and announced, then interacted with those here, most of whom are considered USF athletics representatives. All I said was that he should maybe check with someone to make sure it wouldn't be a problem. From the Bulls Club website http://www.mybullscl...hould-know.aspx : What are the general rules regarding recruiting and boosters? Boosters are prohibited from involvement in recruiting prospective student-athletes. A prospective student-athlete is anyone who has started seventh grade classes for men's basketball, or ninth grade classes for all other sports. Boosters should contact USF Athletics staff about any questions in this regard, and refrain from attempting to contact any prospect or to influence his or her decision to attend USF. Such contact includes activity on Facebook or other social networking sites. Please contact the USF Athletics Compliance staff with any questions about rules governing booster contact with prospective or current student-athletes and their family and friends: Steve Horton, Associate Athletics Director: (813) 974-6858 Horton@usf.edu Rick Stumpf, Assistant Athletics Director, Compliance: (813) 974-4061 RStumpf@usf.edu If that is the case then yes it would seem that scout, rivals, espn, 247, maxprep and all other sites can be a conduit for illegal contact. Maybe it only applies to those sites affiliated with schools. I guess its better to be safe than sorry. Does it matter of the kid has verbally committed or signed a L O I . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Rock Da Bull Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 74 Content Count: 924 Reputation: 50 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/04/2010 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Seems to have been speaking in general termssnd not to a specific recruit so if recruits do post their decisions here the ncaa could not prove it was because his comment maybe they just wanted to don't think the ncaa would persue something as ambiguous as that. It would be a good way to establish a relationship with the fans as long as they post on their own accord The invitation wasn't the problem. The problem COULD be if an unsigned recruit came on here and announced, then interacted with those here, most of whom are considered USF athletics representatives. All I said was that he should maybe check with someone to make sure it wouldn't be a problem. From the Bulls Club website http://www.mybullscl...hould-know.aspx : What are the general rules regarding recruiting and boosters? Boosters are prohibited from involvement in recruiting prospective student-athletes. A prospective student-athlete is anyone who has started seventh grade classes for men's basketball, or ninth grade classes for all other sports. Boosters should contact USF Athletics staff about any questions in this regard, and refrain from attempting to contact any prospect or to influence his or her decision to attend USF. Such contact includes activity on Facebook or other social networking sites. Please contact the USF Athletics Compliance staff with any questions about rules governing booster contact with prospective or current student-athletes and their family and friends: Steve Horton, Associate Athletics Director: (813) 974-6858 Horton@usf.edu Rick Stumpf, Assistant Athletics Director, Compliance: (813) 974-4061 RStumpf@usf.edu If that is the case then yes it would seem that scout, rivals, espn, 247, maxprep and all other sites can be a conduit for illegal contact. Maybe it only applies to those sites affiliated with schools. I guess its better to be safe than sorry. Does it matter of the kid has verbally committed or signed a L O I . if the kid signed a LOI or is enrolled early then yes contact is permitted but just committed is under the same rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted July 15, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,640 Reputation: 10,878 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Seems to have been speaking in general termssnd not to a specific recruit so if recruits do post their decisions here the ncaa could not prove it was because his comment maybe they just wanted to don't think the ncaa would persue something as ambiguous as that. It would be a good way to establish a relationship with the fans as long as they post on their own accord The invitation wasn't the problem. The problem COULD be if an unsigned recruit came on here and announced, then interacted with those here, most of whom are considered USF athletics representatives. All I said was that he should maybe check with someone to make sure it wouldn't be a problem. From the Bulls Club website http://www.mybullscl...hould-know.aspx : What are the general rules regarding recruiting and boosters? Boosters are prohibited from involvement in recruiting prospective student-athletes. A prospective student-athlete is anyone who has started seventh grade classes for men's basketball, or ninth grade classes for all other sports. Boosters should contact USF Athletics staff about any questions in this regard, and refrain from attempting to contact any prospect or to influence his or her decision to attend USF. Such contact includes activity on Facebook or other social networking sites. Please contact the USF Athletics Compliance staff with any questions about rules governing booster contact with prospective or current student-athletes and their family and friends: Steve Horton, Associate Athletics Director: (813) 974-6858 Horton@usf.edu Rick Stumpf, Assistant Athletics Director, Compliance: (813) 974-4061 RStumpf@usf.edu If that is the case then yes it would seem that scout, rivals, espn, 247, maxprep and all other sites can be a conduit for illegal contact. Maybe it only applies to those sites affiliated with schools. I guess its better to be safe than sorry. Bottom line, that's it ... Does it matter of the kid has verbally committed or signed a L O I . This is all stuff pertaining to before an LOI is signed ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliable Source Posted July 16, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 731 Content Count: 10,367 Reputation: 170 Days Won: 40 Joined: 09/15/2008 Author Share Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) Does this include contact with a recruit's parents in said social networking site? I couldn't find anything about that being taboo.... as long as we're not giving him bags of money. Whoops. Dad it looks like they are gonna kick you off the site as well. Sorry, really loved your input. Good luck with your son. Only institutional staff members are permitted to recruit prospective student-athletes. Generally, NCAA rules prohibit anyone else from contacting (calling, writing or in-person contact) prospects or the prospect’s relatives or guardian for recruiting purposes. I would also assume that contacting prospective recruits, like Josh Grady and Chris Bivins, numerous times via twitter, would be included as well. Edited July 16, 2012 by Bullwinkle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southshore26 Posted July 16, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 104 Content Count: 4,442 Reputation: 161 Days Won: 9 Joined: 09/30/2007 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Absolutely right... which is why this same point was brought up last year and the year before that. I can speak to this directly because I went to USF compliance and asked last year.... let me be clear. Your post above is considered contact as is contacting via twitter or facebook. It does not have to be directed at a specific athlete. Mr. Woulard... I enjoy the insight you can offer as do many others, but until your son signs his LOI you're walking a very fine line from what I understand. I can not speak for Brad.... just passing along what I was told from USF Compliance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now