Who'sYourData? Posted July 12, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 410 Content Count: 19,525 Reputation: 992 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted July 12, 2012 LMAO at Syracuse being on the Knights list. What a joke. I guess it's because of their "upwardly mobile" status. They had a stretch through the 80s and 90s when they finished ranked almost every year. We have yet to finish ranked once. They are moving back down to peasantville, but I think Knight is fair. I'm glad USF is on the list, one might notice that there are plenty of programs that did not make the list. *cough* UCF *cough* 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullFan98 Posted July 12, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 258 Content Count: 7,780 Reputation: 328 Days Won: 7 Joined: 08/13/2010 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Based on the tone of the article and the peasant title, I would have preferred not be named at all. Also very negative on the BE. Is SI owned by ESPN? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted July 12, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,736 Reputation: 10,960 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted July 12, 2012 LMAO at Syracuse being on the Knights list. What a joke. I guess it's because of their "upwardly mobile" status. They had a stretch through the 80s and 90s when they finished ranked almost every year. We have yet to finish ranked once. They are moving back down to peasantville, but I think Knight is fair. I'm glad USF is on the list, one might notice that there are plenty of programs that did not make the list. *cough* UCF *cough* For the purposes of this exercise, I've included all current AQ-conference programs, major independents and a certain blue-clad team that falls somewhere in between. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted July 12, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,736 Reputation: 10,960 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Based on the tone of the article and the peasant title, I would have preferred not be named at all. Also very negative on the BE. Is SI owned by ESPN? It's hard to be anything else, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florida Bull Posted July 12, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 436 Reputation: 5 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 LMAO at Syracuse being on the Knights list. What a joke. I guess it's because of their "upwardly mobile" status. They had a stretch through the 80s and 90s when they finished ranked almost every year. We have yet to finish ranked once. They are moving back down to peasantville, but I think Knight is fair. I'm glad USF is on the list, one might notice that there are plenty of programs that did not make the list. *cough* UCF *cough* In terms of perception, Syracuse also has the advantage of tradition (with a great head start), its basketball success, and being the only nationally recognized college football brand from the state of New York. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsp89 Posted July 12, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 10 Content Count: 158 Reputation: 3 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/04/2009 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Talk about unfair. A program 15 years old. Already beating the 'Barons' and 'Knights' of this list on their home fields?? Go get em guys: http://sportsillustr...p&sct=hp_t11_a0 I think this is more about perception then reality. I mean look at FSU and Miami. Nothing to write home about for them in the last 10 years but they have the NCs to back them up. Perception is reality! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buller64 Posted July 12, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 111 Content Count: 2,016 Reputation: 165 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/25/2006 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I guess that those not listed are the serfs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted July 13, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted July 13, 2012 I guess that those not listed are the serfs? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxFjQzgkqHk&feature=youtube_gdata_player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
&rew Bull Posted July 13, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 91 Content Count: 1,716 Reputation: 272 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/19/2010 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Based on the tone of the article and the peasant title, I would have preferred not be named at all. Also very negative on the BE. Is SI owned by ESPN? I'm pretty sure that SI is owned by Time Warner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted July 13, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 7 Content Count: 2,305 Reputation: 120 Days Won: 6 Joined: 11/29/2010 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Have to start somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now