Big West to Assess Boise State

[Skingraft]

Even in the "lowly" BE the palyers are bigger than many that BSU has faced. The week in week out beating that players take change the situation rapidly.

I agree with this... Boise has a great program, but they played cupcakes 90% of the time each year and the change is competition will challenge their depth

[FazaUSF]

Except... half the new Big East in 2013 is current C-USA... there will still be plenty of cupcakes.

[beastiebull]

Yeah UGA really sucked last year.

[Bulls1181]

The Boise State team from this year and last year would have won the BE conference. They lose one of the top college players in Kellen Moore at the most important position. Boise will not run through the BE next year.

[GaUSFBull]

Yeah UGA really sucked last year.

I think UGA can be included in the 10% good teams they played.

[beastiebull]

Yeah UGA really sucked last year.

I think UGA can be included in the 10% good teams they played.

And uga would have destroyed every team in the BE. 10% or not, Boise is not going to come into the BE and get worn down as someone here intimated.

[FazaUSF]

I agree Boise won't run the table, but I bet they can bank on at least near a .500 in conference, assuming they play Temple, SMU, UCF, Syracuse, UConn, SDSU. I also tend to think USF isn't going to be a world-beater the first year we play BSU, with the number of seniors we're losing and a new QB starting once Daniels graduates. It could be a potentially painful year, with UCF salivating all over themselves to play us that year too. Maybe we get some stud QB, but he'll still be a true freshman at that point. We better bring home some BE hardware this year, because if we can't do it this year, we sure aren't likely to do so for a few years after that.

[Skingraft]

Yeah UGA really sucked last year.

I think UGA can be included in the 10% good teams they played.

And uga would have destroyed every team in the BE. 10% or not, Boise is not going to come into the BE and get worn down as someone here intimated.

I think people are saying that the elevated level of competition will be more of a physical challenge then what they have has in the past. This in turn challenges their depth.

Edited May 19, 2012 by skingraft

[GaUSFBull]

Yeah UGA really sucked last year.

I think UGA can be included in the 10% good teams they played.

And uga would have destroyed every team in the BE. 10% or not, Boise is not going to come into the BE and get worn down as someone here intimated.

I doubt UGA would have destroyed WVU last year. They beat dominated a decent Clemson team in the bowl. I do feel that Boise will have a tougher week-in, week-out schedule than they were accustomed to in the WAC. That shouldn't be a stretch at all.

[Bull-by-Marriage]

Yeah UGA really sucked last year.

I think UGA can be included in the 10% good teams they played.

And uga would have destroyed every team in the BE. 10% or not, Boise is not going to come into the BE and get worn down as someone here intimated.

I intimated that will get worn down. The size difference alone makes a difference.

2011 rosters

USF had 11 players 300 or above, 6 players 290-300

BSU had 4 players 300 and above, 7 players 290-300