813knight Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 639 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 04/18/2007 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Not too sure that is a good thing to be getting into. You dumped WVU at the last minute and didn't you move, or drop, a game @ Pitt?someone else might know the details better than me/or correct me if I'm wrong but I think WVU was dropped b/c of the change in conference from MAC to CUSA and Pitt was dropped b/c we moved to an OCS that changed the priority to have more home games and I think was also related to getting the Texas deal done to open the stadium. Those deals were done expecting to be at the Citrus Bowl longer, moving on campus changes a lot of your plans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South_Florida_Flip Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2010 That's a very weak excuse on the WVU end of it. You were already in C-USA when you were supposed to go to WVU.I can understand the Pitt deal, but you still dropped games and put the other programs in a bad position.I don't like when we've done it, nor when it has been done to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usf97 Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,647 Reputation: 456 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/01/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2010 I have to give props to Woolard on this one.....$650,000 is a pretty good deal for a pay game and UTEP is not a shabby team. As someone mentioned, I wonder how much getting the payout from ND allows us to buy a game like this?If that were the case, we may want to consider doing something like that again in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 19, 2010 another crappy scheduleusf plays nobodies again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South_Florida_Flip Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2010 another crappy scheduleusf plays nobodies againND and Miami are "nobodies"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,631 Reputation: 10,871 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2010 another crappy scheduleusf plays nobodies again :withstupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Martin Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,044 Reputation: 228 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/23/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2010 another crappy scheduleusf plays nobodies againND and Miami are "nobodies"?Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobull.Bulls Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,241 Reputation: 60 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/02/2007 Share Posted October 19, 2010 not bad, at least FAMU has one of the best bands in the country Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeBull Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 624 Reputation: 74 Days Won: 1 Joined: 12/12/2005 Share Posted October 19, 2010 not bad, at least FAMU has one of the best bands in the countryWhen FAMU was here in 2005 they gave a bump to attendance at 43,122 the 3rd largest home crowd of the year behind UCF and West Virginia with each about 45K (smaller crowds in those days, the other big east games where 'ville 27K and Cincy 33K).I remember there was a buzz around the Bay area to see the band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danm1983 Posted October 19, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 2,994 Reputation: 151 Days Won: 4 Joined: 08/20/2009 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Not bad. I would like at some point to make the FCS games happen every other year (particularly on the years we only have 3 home BE games - unless the BE expands).So next year we have:Road game at Notre DameHome game FCS FAMUHome game against MAC Ball StateHome game against C-USA UTEP3 BE home games - WVU, UC, and UL4 BE road games - UConn, SU, RU, and PittHome game vs ACC MiamiIt's a nice schedule. It could be better, but shouldn't be a killer for Holtz in Year 2, nor does it look as boring as this year's plate of cupcakes did.-Road game at Notre Dame to open will be on TV. Great chance to beat Brian Kelly - and he should have a better Year 2 with a full recruiting year under his belt and some of his players being older. Will be a nice test to start the year.-FAMU game will help fill the stands (perhaps better than FAU did). They're a better FCS team than some we've played, and they have a sweet band.-Ball State's coach will be in Year 2 I believe, and they should be a little better. Still better than a SunBelt school.-UTEP isn't a bad team - not sure if Donald Buckram will be there next year - he's a stout RB - still better than a SunBelt school.-Miami at home - always a test, always a packed house, another good measuring stick.In addition, Louisville should be improved under Strong in Year 2, as should Cincy in Year 2 with Collaros more experienced. WVU will lose some players but should still be a good team.The road BE games are always a challenge, and Pitt, RU, and UConn should be in the mix next year, while SU should be even more improved.Notre Dame and Miami help our SoS and having two BCS teams is nice. I think if the schedule could be improved at all, it would be to lose the FCS school and keep playing a SunBelt or MAC school as the "cupcake", and keep two C-USA schools on the schedule, or one C-USA (at least keeps it regional), and maybe go find a MWC or WAC team to come play...or even a game with Army or Navy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.