Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Missouri, Nebraska, Syracuse, Pitt, and Rutgers to Big Ten per Peter King


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  10,565
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  05/14/2005

As much as we defend the Big East, I doubt you'd find many of us complaining if we end up in the SEC.

We wouldn't end up there. If the Big 12 loses Nebraska and Missouri to the Big 10, then look for the PAC 10 to take Colorado.

The SEC will then look to take Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

  • Group:  Bull Backers
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  4,741
  • Reputation:   127
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  02/25/2004

Why are some on here immediately discounting this report?

Because the Big 10 is going to expand by 5 and not take ND?

YES! ND is not the end all be all that they used to be. So, if the source said that the Big 10 is going after Un, Pitt, RU, SU, and ND, then it would be believable? ND is very happy as an independent in football, and the BE will still remain as a conference for other sports, if not for all sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  10,565
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  05/14/2005

YES! ND is not the end all be all that they used to be. So, if the source said that the Big 10 is going after Un, Pitt, RU, SU, and ND, then it would be believable? ND is very happy as an independent in football, and the BE will still remain as a conference for other sports, if not for all sports.

ND is more of a "end all" than Missouri, Pitt, RU, and Syracuse are. They are fine on either end of the spectrum and that is a scary proposition if they don't go to the Big 10.

If the Big East loses 3 programs to the Big 10 and ND isn't one of them, then Big East football is dead. The non football playing Big East programs would be fine, but programs like USF's would be in trouble if that happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  771
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/30/2009

YES! ND is not the end all be all that they used to be. So, if the source said that the Big 10 is going after Un, Pitt, RU, SU, and ND, then it would be believable? ND is very happy as an independent in football, and the BE will still remain as a conference for other sports, if not for all sports.

ND is more of a "end all" than Missouri, Pitt, RU, and Syracuse are. They are fine on either end of the spectrum and that is a scary proposition if they don't go to the Big 10.

If the Big East loses 3 programs to the Big 10 and ND isn't one of them, then Big East football is dead. The non football playing Big East programs would be fine, but programs like USF's would be in trouble if that happened.

agreed.  usf would have to hope the SEC would raid the acc so they could get an invite to the acc, or get into the big 12 somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  4,642
  • Reputation:   9
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/09/2006

I'd bet we'd end up in the ACC with a few BE teams, ie UL, WVU.  That would be my preference at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,570
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  08/22/2007

Once again, the Big East will not die. It will turn into c-usa II.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  3,647
  • Reputation:   456
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  02/01/2005

Once again, the Big East will not die. It will turn into c-usa II.

Sadly I tend to agree that this is what will happen if all this massive shift happens. The Big Ten and SEC will be at the top of the food chain. The Pac-10, Big 12 and ACC will be somewhere in the middle and the Big East, MWC, WAC, CUSA, MAC and Sun Belt will be cleaning up scraps up off the floor (in that order). Actually, to some extent, that is already what is happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,235
  • Reputation:   107
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/23/2003

Sadly I tend to agree that this is what will happen if all this massive shift happens. The Big Ten and SEC will be at the top of the food chain. The Pac-10, Big 12 and ACC will be somewhere in the middle and the Big East, MWC, WAC, CUSA, MAC and Sun Belt will be cleaning up scraps up off the floor (in that order). Actually, to some extent, that is already what is happening.

if the big 12 loses Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, OK State, Texas, and A&M, then they will be no better off than the Big East, probably worse off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  86
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/05/2010

As it stands:

Big 10 adds Nebraska, Mizzou, Rutgers, Syracuse, Pitt (ND stays independent)

SEC adds 1(Texas, Texas AM, Oklahoma, OK state) or 2(FSU, Miami, Clemson, GT)

which forces the ACC to add:

1(WVU, Louisville, UCONN, Cinci/USF) or 2(WVU, Louisville, UCONN, Cinci, USF, plus 2 others)

I hope the SEC raids the ACC instead of the Big 12. If not, we are battling with Cinci for the last seat in the BCS. (Advantage USF?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.