Matt Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 12,293 Reputation: 64 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/01/2003 Share Posted February 25, 2010 If it was a substance abuse issue, then I believe the 3d strike requires dismissal from the team. There was a change to the policy a couple years ago. It is a USF policy and outside the discretion of the individual coaches.do you really think that the new coach came in and 3 months after the hire decided he was going to annouce an old policy to retro-dismiss a MVP of the most recent bowl game??????come on sanjay.mike had to of either been arrested or failed a drug test.we want to all love players for usf cause they can score touchdowns or make us feel better among our friends but i dont want someone who cant understand their chance to be a person who represents me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCBull Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,159 Reputation: 864 Days Won: 8 Joined: 09/25/2008 Share Posted February 25, 2010 Agree with Matt here. Thanks for the good times, Mike, and I hope he makes it to an NFL roster. But we'll be OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 14,415 Reputation: 445 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted February 25, 2010 It may have been drugs, but if it was academics, wouldn't be surprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 12,293 Reputation: 64 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/01/2003 Share Posted February 25, 2010 It may have been drugs, but if it was academics, wouldn't be surprised. i doubt academics gets annouced in feb. and gets labeled a violation of team rules..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldozier1 Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,570 Reputation: 14 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/22/2007 Share Posted February 25, 2010 Jamar Taylor is the better back out of the two. I never thought Mike could beat him out. Good luck to Mike. But I don't see an NFL team taking a risk on him. Drug problems, arrests, grades. God forbid if he has to take the wonderlic test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,738 Reputation: 10,964 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted February 25, 2010 That's a myth, Leavitt loved Ford. He gave him more chances then any kid humanly possible should be given to be on a team, and playing.That's impossible ..... Ford wasn't a senior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,738 Reputation: 10,964 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted February 25, 2010 If it was a substance abuse issue, then I believe the 3d strike requires dismissal from the team. There was a change to the policy a couple years ago. It is a USF policy and outside the discretion of the individual coaches. do you really think that the new coach came in and 3 months after the hire decided he was going to annouce an old policy to retro-dismiss a MVP of the most recent bowl game?????? come on sanjay. mike had to of either been arrested or failed a drug test. Matt, what in the hell are you talking about?? Did you even read what Sanjay wrote ...?? You are on a roll tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 12,293 Reputation: 64 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/01/2003 Share Posted February 25, 2010 triple b...i was wrong in who i quoted....i guess you just float around waiting to call me out.me and sanjay are usually on the same page.there was a post about someone calling ford out and how it wasnt a good look for holtz.oh well. keep on keeping on with your same tatics.have fun.and yea sanjay...you are smart enough to decide the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 74,738 Reputation: 10,964 Days Won: 425 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted February 25, 2010 triple b...i was wrong in who i quoted....i guess you just float around waiting to call me out.me and sanjay are usually on the same page.there was a post about someone calling ford out and how it wasnt a good look for holtz.oh well. keep on keeping on with your same tatics.have fun.and yea sanjay...you are smart enough to decide the difference.Alrighty then .... but honestly, if I just floated around waiting to call you out, I'd have had a field day tonight.And BTW, it should be "Sanjay and I are usually on the same page". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmhatter Posted February 25, 2010 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,174 Reputation: 268 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/02/2007 Share Posted February 25, 2010 If it was a substance abuse issue, then I believe the 3d strike requires dismissal from the team. There was a change to the policy a couple years ago. It is a USF policy and outside the discretion of the individual coaches.do you really think that the new coach came in and 3 months after the hire decided he was going to annouce an old policy to retro-dismiss a MVP of the most recent bowl game??????come on sanjay.mike had to of either been arrested or failed a drug test.we want to all love players for usf cause they can score touchdowns or make us feel better among our friends but i dont want someone who cant understand their chance to be a person who represents me.def didnt get arrested Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.