Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Renderings coming Tuesday!


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Content Count:  10,916
  • Reputation:   4,036
  • Days Won:  67
  • Joined:  05/23/2019

9 minutes ago, bull2saintleo said:

Lot 22 to the Sycamore Fields per Gogle Maps is a 16 minute walk currently, so 10-15 minutes is probably a good estimate.

image.png.508adc50c18206208d17a6f2ad5ff92b.png

Perfect, that takes approximately 2 beers per my estimations.

  • Upvote 2
  • Go Bulls! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  4,751
  • Content Count:  37,673
  • Reputation:   2,365
  • Days Won:  29
  • Joined:  12/24/2001

Remember this is a Rendering, changes will happen come April

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Content Count:  10,916
  • Reputation:   4,036
  • Days Won:  67
  • Joined:  05/23/2019

Just now, michibull said:

Funny thing, is I just looked up a bunch of pictures of UNT’s stadium and your spot on, looks almost cut and paste with adding the other end with stands. This upsets me, haha. 

I have driven by the stadium numerous times however have never had a reason to go in, it is a nice stadium, but would love to leave them in my rear view mirror. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  131
  • Content Count:  3,097
  • Reputation:   163
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/17/2004

2 minutes ago, 79 Bull said:

Debbie downer here.  It looks okay, but I guess I expected a bit more for $300m+.  The seating areas look fine.  Perceived drawbacks from 1 rendering...

Metal supports do look really cheap (and almost unstable but I'm sure only the best structural engineers were involved).

No concourses to mill about and still be able to see the field - unless that rooftop area in the east endzone works for that but they don't show any fake people on it.

Thinking the concession areas are going to look a lot like UCF (wide open with lots of metal poles around). Would prefer a closed in Tulane type look for that.

And assuming a home side season ticket is going to be double what they cost now, expecting a shaded seat for even nooners is not unreasonable.

Also agree with others that it must be able to hold the largest possible pitch for soccer as a rental revenue generator.

Let's be honest, if this single rendering was released by UCF or any of our current conference mates, we would all be saying "looks cheap like the new soccer stadiums going up, we're going to build something way better".

All that being said, let's do this and GO BULLS!

VPMK said the concourse would be open to the field in between the lower and upper sections to have view of the field and the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  46
  • Content Count:  2,569
  • Reputation:   345
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/15/2005

3 minutes ago, 79 Bull said:

Debbie downer here.  It looks okay, but I guess I expected a bit more for $300m+.  The seating areas look fine.  Perceived drawbacks from 1 rendering...

Metal supports do look really cheap (and almost unstable but I'm sure only the best structural engineers were involved).

No concourses to mill about and still be able to see the field - unless that rooftop area in the east endzone works for that but they don't show any fake people on it.

Thinking the concession areas are going to look a lot like UCF (wide open with lots of metal poles around). Would prefer a closed in Tulane type look for that.

And assuming a home side season ticket is going to be double what they cost now, expecting a shaded seat for even nooners is not unreasonable.

Also agree with others that it must be able to hold the largest possible pitch for soccer as a rental revenue generator.

Let's be honest, if this single rendering was released by UCF or any of our current conference mates, we would all be saying "looks cheap like the new soccer stadiums going up, we're going to build something way better".

All that being said, let's do this and GO BULLS!

MK did say that the lower concourse would be open and have a full view of the field.

Edited by BullsWinBucsWin
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  2,343
  • Content Count:  21,362
  • Reputation:   920
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  01/02/2007

Short cuts through areas but you might have to climb some fences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  21,119
  • Reputation:   4,625
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

Can we put a facade around the metal poles to make people happy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  12,621
  • Reputation:   3,312
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  10/16/2017

19 minutes ago, 79 Bull said:

Debbie downer here.  It looks okay, but I guess I expected a bit more for $300m+.  The seating areas look fine.  Perceived drawbacks from 1 rendering...

Metal supports do look really cheap (and almost unstable but I'm sure only the best structural engineers were involved).

No concourses to mill about and still be able to see the field - unless that rooftop area in the east endzone works for that but they don't show any fake people on it.

Thinking the concession areas are going to look a lot like UCF (wide open with lots of metal poles around). Would prefer a closed in Tulane type look for that.

And assuming a home side season ticket is going to be double what they cost now, expecting a shaded seat for even nooners is not unreasonable.

Also agree with others that it must be able to hold the largest possible pitch for soccer as a rental revenue generator.

Let's be honest, if this single rendering was released by UCF or any of our current conference mates, we would all be saying "looks cheap like the new soccer stadiums going up, we're going to build something way better".

All that being said, let's do this and GO BULLS!

I am with you,  it isn't the crown jewel of g5 stadiums , but it isn't the worse. I called it was going to pushed back originally and people said no it would be opening for the 2026 season. I wonder why there is a delay ? 

Edited by Outlaw
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  4,751
  • Content Count:  37,673
  • Reputation:   2,365
  • Days Won:  29
  • Joined:  12/24/2001

Also, seating is right on the field...not far away,

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  109
  • Content Count:  21,119
  • Reputation:   4,625
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

8 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

I am with you,  it isn't the crown jewel of g5 stadiums , but it isn't the worse. I called it was going to pushes back originally and people said no it would be opening for the 2026 season. I wonder why there is a delay ? 

Probably calculating the people whining about shade in the design vs the cost?  Maybe wanted to fully explore all options. Just guessing. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.