Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Offensive scheme under CAG?


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  48
  • Content Count:  2,343
  • Reputation:   660
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/29/2009

Fast, spread, running and wr option routes. WR option will be interesting to see how they pick this up bc we could see a bunch of ints off the bat until everyone gets dialed in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  71
  • Content Count:  12,360
  • Reputation:   3,190
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  10/16/2017

1 hour ago, USFBULL_08 said:

Fast, spread, running and wr option routes. WR option will be interesting to see how they pick this up bc we could see a bunch of ints off the bat until everyone gets dialed in.

I think we are used to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Content Count:  841
  • Reputation:   463
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/24/2021

Worth pointing out that Tennessee's offense was designed to be a first progression look for their QB. The coaches found their target/weakness in the defense, called a play, and let the receiver option into space. Hooker made most of his completions on first progression, taking a lot of pressure of of him. This was so effective for Hooker at Tennessee, that it was viewed as a negative because he didn't *have* to work through a progression tree across the playbook, which is a complex skillset. 

Pros: Simple for QB, higher probability first progression target, delegation of thinking takes the pressure off the qb and puts it on the coaches, can play faster

Cons: QB may not be #1 overall pick

I'll take it. 

GettyImages-1470999183.jpg

Hooker had plenty to say to anybody thinking the Tennessee offense didn't challenge him or the talent around him.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  119
  • Content Count:  6,523
  • Reputation:   2,699
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  09/02/2014

1 hour ago, USF_Bullsharks said:

Worth pointing out that Tennessee's offense was designed to be a first progression look for their QB. The coaches found their target/weakness in the defense, called a play, and let the receiver option into space. Hooker made most of his completions on first progression, taking a lot of pressure of of him. This was so effective for Hooker at Tennessee, that it was viewed as a negative because he didn't *have* to work through a progression tree across the playbook, which is a complex skillset. 

Pros: Simple for QB, higher probability first progression target, delegation of thinking takes the pressure off the qb and puts it on the coaches, can play faster

Cons: QB may not be #1 overall pick

I'll take it. 

GettyImages-1470999183.jpg

Hooker had plenty to say to anybody thinking the Tennessee offense didn't challenge him or the talent around him.

 

I feel Byrum Brown can make more than one progression. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.