JTrue Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted October 12, 2014 I stand by my comment. It's scary there are people here who think Holtz was NOT a bad coach and the downfall of USF Football His current team would put up 40 on this team.Holtz was a lazy recruiter, but he could coach offense. The offenses were 87th, 48th and 106th in points per game his 3 years here. Better but not exactly an offensive juggernaut. So, about 40, 80, and 25 spots higher than CWT's offense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANJAY Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 300 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted October 12, 2014 I said they were better. Presumably you're not saying that makes skip some sort of offensive genius. He looked a lot less smart on offense in games where BJ didn't play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted October 12, 2014 I said they were better. Presumably you're not saying that makes skip some sort of offensive genius. He looked a lot less smart on offense in games where BJ didn't play. Holtz's teams look like the 90s Rams compared to CWT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted October 12, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,898 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted October 12, 2014 their coach was disgusting over weight ass sweating thru his light colored pass carrying around his face sweat rag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted October 12, 2014 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 583 Content Count: 22,702 Reputation: 5,835 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Skip's team put up 16 on Oklahoma, 17 v Auburn and 27, 42, 48 and 55. http://www.latechsports.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/latc-m-footbl-sched.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now