Jump to content

  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

one last interesting tidbit from the game

BullGrad95
 Share

Recommended Posts

BullGrad95 Mentor

BullGrad95

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  89
  • Content Count:  880
  • Reputation:   13
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/24/2001
Posted

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cmhatter Toro Magnifico

cmhatter

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  576
  • Content Count:  8,174
  • Reputation:   268
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  09/02/2007
Posted

And willie was their DCs head coach?

Wouldn't that at least negate their advantage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
slick1ru2 Toro Magnifico

slick1ru2

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  553
  • Content Count:  14,405
  • Reputation:   434
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  07/25/2008
Posted (edited)

We heard it all game on ESPN3. I said it in the chat room. Except his old DC looked like Gruden. Doesn't change anything. Maybe he should have taken him with him to USF.

Edited by slick1ru2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Triple B Toro Magnifico

Triple B

Posted
  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,587
  • Reputation:   10,852
  • Days Won:  423
  • Joined:  11/25/2005
Posted

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deters- Toro Magnifico

deters-

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  67
  • Content Count:  3,749
  • Reputation:   309
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  07/22/2008
Posted

 

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too.

 

multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Triple B Toro Magnifico

Triple B

Posted
  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,587
  • Reputation:   10,852
  • Days Won:  423
  • Joined:  11/25/2005
Posted

 

 

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too.

 

multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all.

 

 

Good points ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GaUSFBull Toro Magnifico

GaUSFBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009
Posted

 

 

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too.

 

multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all.

 

 

Man, that sounds so familiar ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deters- Toro Magnifico

deters-

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  67
  • Content Count:  3,749
  • Reputation:   309
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  07/22/2008
Posted

 

 

 

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too.

 

multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all.

 

 

Man, that sounds so familiar ... 

 

That it does. We played nearly the worst possible game in terms of errors and mistakes. McNeese played a perfect game. No overcoming that. Even though I'm positive there is more talent on our team than theirs, we would have lost to Gaither if we played like we did tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
McNeese722 Contributor

McNeese722

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Content Count:  52
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2013
Posted

 

 

 

 

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too.

 

multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all.

 

 

Man, that sounds so familiar ... 

 

That it does. We played nearly the worst possible game in terms of errors and mistakes. McNeese played a perfect game. No overcoming that. Even though I'm positive there is more talent on our team than theirs, we would have lost to Gaither if we played like we did tonight.

 

 

Not really perfect.   We had a pass intercepted, had some dropped passes, a LB getting out of position on your first offensive play, and our FS got beat on a couple of passes for TD's.   Things like that have to improve if we are going to make the playoffs and make any noise in them against teams like North Dakota St.

 

Doc

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FrmrPokeCenter Apprentice

FrmrPokeCenter

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  27
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/25/2006
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

Just heard on the broadcast that the DC for McNeese was CWT's DC last year at WKU.  Anyone remember how a certain John Gruden knew EXACTLY what the Raiders were running when they lost to the Bucs in the Super Bowl?

 

Look, I know this is not the reason we lost the game, but is does stand to reason that McNeese had a good understanding of the offensive tendencies of CWT and played to those strengths tonight.

 

 

It looked like just the opposite to me. The MSU OC being very familiar with our defense and knew what to call, when. I know we gave them a short field too many times but they had some long ass drives mixed in there, too.

 

multiple times with a short field, quick turnaround due to turnovers, 3 n outs and short drives = one tired ass defense. They had nearly 10 minutes more TOP. Our defense was gassed and the offense didn't help them at all.

 

 

Man, that sounds so familiar ... 

 

That it does. We played nearly the worst possible game in terms of errors and mistakes. McNeese played a perfect game. No overcoming that. Even though I'm positive there is more talent on our team than theirs, we would have lost to Gaither if we played like we did tonight.

 

 

Not really perfect.   We had a pass intercepted, had some dropped passes, a LB getting out of position on your first offensive play, and our FS got beat on a couple of passes for TD's.   Things like that have to improve if we are going to make the playoffs and make any noise in them against teams like North Dakota St.

 

Doc

 

Matt and Lance will get those things corrected after some film work this week....the FS getting beat like that concerns me a little....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.

Got it!
Dismiss