Knight_Light Posted September 2, 2013 Group: UCF Knights Topic Count: 207 Content Count: 2,276 Reputation: 9 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/04/2000 Share Posted September 2, 2013 He should have been fired for the debacle of giving Holtz an extension. WTF wow, forgot how dumb that was And you forgot the reasoning, that the same guy on the USF board that was complaining about the team on one hand agreed about the extension on the other because Holtz was getting offers from other BCS schools at the time and the school didn't want to see him go to another BCS program and become successful and look like cheap ass fools for not retaining him. At that time the losses were end of game, some on the last play after major wins against ND and this happened right after beating Clemson. Again, all this talk IS HIND SIGHT and leaves out things like that or that the AD's raise WAS LINKED TO COACHING/TEAM PERFORMANCE. Thats laughable...as his agent tried to sell that to the media but NO ONE was buying it...especially since Holtz just lost 7 out of his last 8 games. As others noted, Woolard quietly gave him a contract extension some 8 months AFTER the season ended...all so he could enjoy a raise too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted September 2, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 197 Content Count: 10,251 Reputation: 270 Days Won: 14 Joined: 08/16/2005 Share Posted September 2, 2013 He should have been fired for the debacle of giving Holtz an extension. WTF wow, forgot how dumb that was And you forgot the reasoning, that the same guy on the USF board that was complaining about the team on one hand agreed about the extension on the other because Holtz was getting offers from other BCS schools at the time and the school didn't want to see him go to another BCS program and become successful and look like cheap ass fools for not retaining him. At that time the losses were end of game, some on the last play after major wins against ND and this happened right after beating Clemson. Again, all this talk IS HIND SIGHT and leaves out things like that or that the AD's raise WAS LINKED TO COACHING/TEAM PERFORMANCE. Thats laughable...as his agent tried to sell that to the media but NO ONE was buying it...especially since Holtz just lost 7 out of his last 8 games. As others noted, Woolard quietly gave him a contract extension some 8 months AFTER the season ended...all so he could enjoy a raise too. Does your tiny penis really make you feel that bad? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick1ru2 Posted September 2, 2013 Group: Member Topic Count: 553 Content Count: 14,405 Reputation: 434 Days Won: 13 Joined: 07/25/2008 Share Posted September 2, 2013 (edited) He should have been fired for the debacle of giving Holtz an extension. WTF wow, forgot how dumb that was And you forgot the reasoning, that the same guy on the USF board that was complaining about the team on one hand agreed about the extension on the other because Holtz was getting offers from other BCS schools at the time and the school didn't want to see him go to another BCS program and become successful and look like cheap ass fools for not retaining him. At that time the losses were end of game, some on the last play after major wins against ND and this happened right after beating Clemson. Again, all this talk IS HIND SIGHT and leaves out things like that or that the AD's raise WAS LINKED TO COACHING/TEAM PERFORMANCE. Thats laughable...as his agent tried to sell that to the media but NO ONE was buying it...especially since Holtz just lost 7 out of his last 8 games. As others noted, Woolard quietly gave him a contract extension some 8 months AFTER the season ended...all so he could enjoy a raise too. 5 of those games were one score, 4 were 3 pt games. At least 1 or two were lost on the very last play. So its not that implausible. Edited September 2, 2013 by slick1ru2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted September 2, 2013 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,629 Reputation: 10,871 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted September 2, 2013 He should have been fired for the debacle of giving Holtz an extension. WTF wow, forgot how dumb that was And you forgot the reasoning, that the same guy on the USF board that was complaining about the team on one hand agreed about the extension on the other because Holtz was getting offers from other BCS schools at the time and the school didn't want to see him go to another BCS program and become successful and look like cheap ass fools for not retaining him. At that time the losses were end of game, some on the last play after major wins against ND and this happened right after beating Clemson. Again, all this talk IS HIND SIGHT and leaves out things like that or that the AD's raise WAS LINKED TO COACHING/TEAM PERFORMANCE. Thats laughable...as his agent tried to sell that to the media but NO ONE was buying it...especially since Holtz just lost 7 out of his last 8 games. As others noted, Woolard quietly gave him a contract extension some 8 months AFTER the season ended...all so he could enjoy a raise too. 5 of those games were one score, 4 were 3 pt games. At least 1 or two were lost on the very last play. So its not that implausible. If I am not mistaken USF was tied or leading in the 4th quarter in all but one game that year. Exactly ... We were one chip shot fg away from another bowl eligible year. It looks terrible in hindsight but at the time, under the circumstances, not that implausible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now