South_Florida_Flip Posted October 9, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 99 Content Count: 10,565 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 7 Joined: 05/14/2005 Share Posted October 9, 2012 I know you made your point and I probably should have put in that other quote, so my apologies there. We just have a difference of opinion on what should have happened today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted October 9, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted October 9, 2012 you know-- it's not a personal attack so much as frustration. I made my point very clearly and you ignore it and quote the part you can attack even though what I wrote before it addresses the issue. bottom line is this-- the only thing Woolard can control in this situation is access to himself. If he shows up, the focus will shift-- no matter how many times they ask it not to-- to the mess in the football program. I didn't see any attacks on your point - maybe your point wasn't read, but let's still be respectful. I get the frustration bit though, everything going on with this team is frustrating and I feel a bunch of emotions right now. Woolard controls one other thing that you didn't mention - his responses. He doesn't have to comment on football, he can say "no comment" to any football question, or any question, for that matter, that he wants. He probably should have been there, and if he consistently refused to comment on football, he would have looked strong and like a leader - instead, he does come across as cowardly and, given the fact that he has contributed in no small part to the predicament our football program is in now. that just adds fuel to the fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANJAY Posted October 9, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 300 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Woolard should be forced to answer questions about the Bull-on-Bull war of words taking place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted October 9, 2012 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Woolard should be forced to answer questions about the Bull-on-Bull war of words taking place. Exactly, since he's obviously responsible by not showing up at the MBB event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeG Posted October 9, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,984 Content Count: 19,737 Reputation: 3,674 Days Won: 165 Joined: 07/17/2003 Share Posted October 9, 2012 you know-- it's not a personal attack so much as frustration. I made my point very clearly and you ignore it and quote the part you can attack even though what I wrote before it addresses the issue. bottom line is this-- the only thing Woolard can control in this situation is access to himself. If he shows up, the focus will shift-- no matter how many times they ask it not to-- to the mess in the football program. I didn't see any attacks on your point - maybe your point wasn't read, but let's still be respectful. I get the frustration bit though, everything going on with this team is frustrating and I feel a bunch of emotions right now. Woolard controls one other thing that you didn't mention - his responses. He doesn't have to comment on football, he can say "no comment" to any football question, or any question, for that matter, that he wants. He probably should have been there, and if he consistently refused to comment on football, he would have looked strong and like a leader - instead, he does come across as cowardly and, given the fact that he has contributed in no small part to the predicament our football program is in now. that just adds fuel to the fire. get stuffed I was not even close to being over the line in any of my responses 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted October 9, 2012 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,615 Content Count: 74,648 Reputation: 10,879 Days Won: 424 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted October 9, 2012 you know-- it's not a personal attack so much as frustration. I made my point very clearly and you ignore it and quote the part you can attack even though what I wrote before it addresses the issue. bottom line is this-- the only thing Woolard can control in this situation is access to himself. If he shows up, the focus will shift-- no matter how many times they ask it not to-- to the mess in the football program. I didn't see any attacks on your point - maybe your point wasn't read, but let's still be respectful. I get the frustration bit though, everything going on with this team is frustrating and I feel a bunch of emotions right now. Woolard controls one other thing that you didn't mention - his responses. He doesn't have to comment on football, he can say "no comment" to any football question, or any question, for that matter, that he wants. He probably should have been there, and if he consistently refused to comment on football, he would have looked strong and like a leader - instead, he does come across as cowardly and, given the fact that he has contributed in no small part to the predicament our football program is in now. that just adds fuel to the fire. And if he had had to consistently refuse to comment, it would have taken away from the basketball stuff and I think that was Mike's point .... And,please, enough about the mod example ******** already. When this whole forum adopts a "respectful manner" to all things USF, I imagine the mods will all fall in line with that ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now