SANJAY Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Here are the things our staff faces in recruiting:1. 3 in-state BCS programs2. Our campus is getting better but is not the "traditional" campus and is nothing like the numerous "southern" campuses we recruit against.3. Our facilities, although better than before, are a work in progress4. Practice fields/dining hall/etc. this is part of the facilities, but are glaring examples of what is either non-existent orinadequate5. Lack of history. Kids want to play for teams they grew up loving, we're not there yet.6. Every school east of the mississippi recruits in Florida, so even the ones not going to the big 3 often have storied programs recruiting them.7. No reputation as an outstanding academic school. We are a large state school without the prestige of being the state's flagship institution. We are pushing forward on this, and if we ever get into the AAU it will help.8. Small donor base, this is expanding but we don't have the dollars flowing in that a BCS program our size should. This explains the very slow development of the facilities as the administration, rightfully, is not going to put athletics into a financial bnid by building too fast too quickly.I am sure there are others, and I haven't listed them in the order of importance to recruits, but we're slowly getting there. These are the institutional limitations the staff operates under. Money will change some of it, and time will change other parts. Pitt is a very good academic institution that competes with 1 other BCS school in an area that produces a lot of talent. Pitt is part of the AAU and has much better facilities. As much as I like to joke that Pitt won't win no matter who they recruit, the fact is that kids see what Pitt tangibly has and think Pitt has a chance. Meanwhile, we are still selling the dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Admin Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 97,043 Reputation: 10,833 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Pitt - Tony Dorsett, Dan Marino and Hugh Smith (among others) likely come to mind for most football fans. For USF...let's see that guy Bill Gramatica that ruined his career celebrating and that guy in the superbowl this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWMJD Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,048 Reputation: 316 Days Won: 6 Joined: 11/24/2005 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Year after year they bring in these "great" classes yet they are still awful... to me it shows that these ratings mean very little Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jihme Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 4,642 Reputation: 9 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/09/2006 Share Posted February 7, 2008 it's a mix of the worst coaching possible with some players that are overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Bull Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,900 Reputation: 628 Days Won: 5 Joined: 09/02/2007 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Lets learn from this, I think Smazza has a point. What are they doing, that we are not? What do we need to have at USF to put us in the top ranks of recruiting. My recommendation is that the USF Marketing students both MBA and undergrad do a market research by interviewing players who did not choose USF and find out why. This report could be produced for the Athletic department. Are we missing, support services, are we in the wrong conference? What small things can we do to fix the problem. Since the superbowl is coming to Tampa maybe the NFL will pony up a half artificial turn practice field or some other type facility.I am pulling a smazza and quoting two different guys.I think the obvious answer to what they are doing that we aren't is spending way too much time recruiting, and not enough coaching. There has to be a balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Bull Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,900 Reputation: 628 Days Won: 5 Joined: 09/02/2007 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Here are the things our staff faces in recruiting:1. 3 in-state BCS programs2. Our campus is getting better but is not the "traditional" campus and is nothing like the numerous "southern" campuses we recruit against.3. Our facilities, although better than before, are a work in progress4. Practice fields/dining hall/etc. this is part of the facilities, but are glaring examples of what is either non-existent orinadequate5. Lack of history. Kids want to play for teams they grew up loving, we're not there yet.6. Every school east of the mississippi recruits in Florida, so even the ones not going to the big 3 often have storied programs recruiting them.7. No reputation as an outstanding academic school. We are a large state school without the prestige of being the state's flagship institution. We are pushing forward on this, and if we ever get into the AAU it will help.8. Small donor base, this is expanding but we don't have the dollars flowing in that a BCS program our size should. This explains the very slow development of the facilities as the administration, rightfully, is not going to put athletics into a financial bnid by building too fast too quickly.I am sure there are others, and I haven't listed them in the order of importance to recruits, but we're slowly getting there. These are the institutional limitations the staff operates under. Money will change some of it, and time will change other parts. Pitt is a very good academic institution that competes with 1 other BCS school in an area that produces a lot of talent. Pitt is part of the AAU and has much better facilities. As much as I like to joke that Pitt won't win no matter who they recruit, the fact is that kids see what Pitt tangibly has and think Pitt has a chance. Meanwhile, we are still selling the dream.in true smazza fasion i will not use caps or puctuation on this one and evn mispel a werd or too. :clap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BULLSHTR Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,479 Reputation: 224 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/03/2007 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Pitt - Tony Dorsett, Dan Marino and Hugh Smith (among others) likely come to mind for most football fans. For USF...let's see that guy Bill Gramatica that ruined his career celebrating and that guy in the superbowl this year.In one more year, add Mike Jenkins, and the year after that add another, and so on. One year at a time. We are on the right path. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted February 7, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,091 Reputation: 2,434 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Author Share Posted February 7, 2008 Pitt - Tony Dorsett, Dan Marino and Hugh Smith (among others) likely come to mind for most football fans. For USF...let's see that guy Bill Gramatica that ruined his career celebrating and that guy in the superbowl this year.In one more year, add Mike Jenkins, and the year after that add another, and so on. One year at a time. We are on the right path.I DONT think those guys 25 years removed from pitt effect their recruiting in 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted February 8, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Pitt - Tony Dorsett, Dan Marino and Hugh Smith (among others) likely come to mind for most football fans. For USF...let's see that guy Bill Gramatica that ruined his career celebrating and that guy in the superbowl this year.In one more year, add Mike Jenkins, and the year after that add another, and so on. One year at a time. We are on the right path.I DONT think those guys 25 years removed from pitt effect their recruiting in 2008You would be wrong...and the reason is that they are part of the lore... the tradition factor..."We have heisman winners", "We have some of the best players of all time"...18 year olds can get "awed" very easily and the big name programs like OU, UF, USC all have a ton more ammo than we have.We sell and idea and are slowly getting a little proof (like #2 in the nation) .... they sell proof that their ideas worked, work, and will work (national championships, bcs games, etc).Smazz... you discount way too much how much this concept means... and that is why you are so hard on Leavitt. He is agains the odds and still getting us to #2 in the country. Just wait until we have enough tradition to win more of the bigger recruiting battles. Wait until we see what Ford does for USF... then that is one more item to use in our favor... Leavitt will hopefully be able to say "5 star Mike Ford chose not to come here, but then changed his mind and boy... he sure made the right move, and you should too, because we are the new U... we'll make you are star that you know you are"Right now... its mostly selling a dream, and even a few years ago... it was ALL a dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 8, 2008 Group: Admin Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 97,043 Reputation: 10,833 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Pitt - Tony Dorsett, Dan Marino and Hugh Smith (among others) likely come to mind for most football fans. For USF...let's see that guy Bill Gramatica that ruined his career celebrating and that guy in the superbowl this year.In one more year, add Mike Jenkins, and the year after that add another, and so on. One year at a time. We are on the right path.I DONT think those guys 25 years removed from pitt effect their recruiting in 2008Then you don't truly understand. Have you read any articles or seen how these schools present themselves to the easily impressed high school recruit? Probably not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.