Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Such a crazy season.... could the national champion have 2 losses???


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,473
  • Reputation:   1,790
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  12/02/2018

First, I really think the pressure is now off USF.  Sure, there are some tough games left on the schedule... U Conn suddenly looks much better than anyone had thought...

However, this is such a crazy season ... there are only five undefeated teams... and just a handful more with only one loss.  Which means we could realistically be looking at the best teams having 2 losses...

Take a look at schedules the undefeated and 1-loss teams... Oklahoma and LSU have the best chance of remaining with 1-loss, but they have a 13th game: conference championships.

If USF can win out, USF could easily be back in the Top 10... we have a wild football season yet to come...


The final number is my though of their projected finish; and * denotes projected losses.  Bold games are against another undefeated or 1-loss team.

Big East

[table][tr][td]South Florida 6-1[/td][td]10/27 @ U Conn, 11/3 Cincy, 11/10 @ SU, 11/17 L'ville, 11/24 @ Pitt[/td][td]11-1[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Connecticut 6-1[/td][td]10/27 USF*, 11/3 Rut, 11/10 @ Cincy*, 11/17 SU, 11/24 @ WVU*[/td][td]8-4[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Cincinnati 6-1[/td][td]10/20 @ Pitt, 11/3 @ USF*, 11/10 U Conn, 11/17 WVU*, 11/24 @ SU[/td][td]9-3[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]West Virginia 5-1[/td][td]10/20 Miss St, 10/27 Rut, 11/8 L'ville, 11/17 @ Cincy, 11/24 U Conn, 12/1 Pitt[/td][td]11-1[/td][/tr][/table]

Big East Champion: South Florida

ACC

[table][tr][td]Boston College 7-0[/td][td]10/25 @ VT*, 11/3 FSU, 11/10 @ MD*, 11/17 @ Clem, 11/24 Miami[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Virginia Tech 6-1[/td][td]10/25 BC, 11/1 @ GT, 11/10 FSU, 11/17 Miami, 11/24 @ UVa[/td][td]11-1[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Virginia 6-1[/td][td]10/20 @ MD*, 10/27 @ NC St, 11/3 Wake, 11/10 @ Miami*, 11/24 VT*[/td][td]8-4[/td][/tr][/table]

12/1 -> ACC Championship: Boton College over Virgnia Tech.

Big 12

[table][tr][td]Kansas 6-0[/td][td]10/20 @ Colo, 10/27 @ TX A&M*, 11/3 Neb, 11/10 @ OK St, 11/17 Iow St, 11/24 Mizzou[/td][td]11-1[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Missouri 5-1[/td][td]10/20 TX Tech, 10/27 Iowa St, 11/3 @ Colo, 11/10 TX A&M, 11/17 K St, 11/24 @ Kansas*[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Oklahoma 6-1[/td][td]10/20 @ Iowa St, 11/3 TX A&M, 11/10 Baylor, 11/17 @ TX Tech*, 11/24 OK St[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Texas Tech 6-1[/td][td]10/20 @ Mizzou*, 10/27 Colo, 11/3 @ Baylor, 11/10 @ Texas*, 11/17 Oklahoma[/td][td]9-3[/td][/tr][/table]

12/1 -> Big 12 Championship: Oklahoma over Kansas

Big Ten

[table][tr][td]Ohio State 7-0[/td][td]10/20 Mich St*, 10/27 @ Penn St*, 11/3 Wisc, 11/10 Illinois, 11/17 @ Mich*[/td][td]9-3[/td][/tr][/table]

Big Ten Champion: Michigan

Pac Ten

[table][tr][td]Arizona State 7-0[/td][td]10/27 Cal, 11/3 @ Ore*, 11/10 @ UCLA, 11/22 USC*, 12/1 Arizona[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]California 5-1[/td][td]10/20 @ UCLA, 10/27 @ AZ St*, 11/3 Wazzou, 11/10 USC, 11/17 @ UW, 12/1 @ Stanford[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Oregon 5-1[/td][td]10/20 @ UW, 10/27 USC*, 11/3 AZ St, 11/15 @ Arizona, 11/24 @ UCLA, 12/1 Ore st[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Southern Cal 5-1[/td][td]10/20 @ ND, 10/27 @ Ore, 11/3 Ore St, 11/10 @ Cal*, 11/22 @ AZ St, 12/1 UCLA[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr][/table]

Pac Ten Champion: California

SEC

[table][tr][td]South Carolina 6-1[/td][td]10/20 Vandy, 10/27 @ Tenn*, 11/3 @ Ark, 11/10 Fla, 11/24 Clem[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Kentucky 6-1[/td][td]10/20 Fla*, 10/27 Miss St, 11/10 @ Vandy, 11/17 @ UGa, 11/24 Tenn[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]LSU 6-1[/td][td]10/20 Aub*, 11/3 @ Bama, 11/10 LA Tech, 11/17 Ole Miss, 11/23 Ark[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr][/table]

12/1 -> SEC Championship: Auburn over South Carolina

WAC

[table][tr][td]Hawaii 7-0[/td][td]10/28 @ NM St, 11/10 Fresno St*, 11/16 @ Nevada, 11/23 BSU*, 12/1 UW[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]Boise State 5-1[/td][td]10/20 @ LA Tech, 10/26 @ Fres St*, 11/3 SJSU, 11/10 UT St, 11/17 Idaho, 11/23 @ Hawaii[/td][td]10-2[/td][/tr][/table]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,241
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/02/2007

This will go down as the wildest season of college football  to date, and hopefully will start to drum up some real support for a playoff system!  (Aka root for Boston College and Kansas)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will go down as the wildest season of college football  to date, and hopefully will start to drum up some real support for a playoff system!  (Aka root for Boston College and Kansas)

I disagree.  This kind of season PROVES that the regular season is a playoff.  It's not single-elimination (like March Madness), but it shows how important it is to not only win games, but to have a strong schedule as well.

Trust me, I used to advocate a playoff.  Now I'm not so sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  2,511
  • Reputation:   278
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

Only when Urban Meyer cries more than Tim Tebow and then proceeds to wrap his lips firmly around the voting coaches c*cks like he did last year.

That is if they do not lose to FAU at home

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,249
  • Reputation:   341
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/09/2007

This will go down as the wildest season of college football  to date, and hopefully will start to drum up some real support for a playoff system!  (Aka root for Boston College and Kansas)

I disagree.  This kind of season PROVES that the regular season is a playoff.  It's not single-elimination (like March Madness), but it shows how important it is to not only win games, but to have a strong schedule as well.

Trust me, I used to advocate a playoff.  Now I'm not so sure.

it IS single elimination for some teams, but not others.

1-loss Oklahoma, LSU, Florida, OSU, USC, Michigan, etc. would all get consideration for a NC bid if there were only 1 undefeated team.  they might also get consideration over some undefeated teams.

but a 1-loss USF or Boston College or Kansas or Missouri would NOT get consideration unless all the teams mentioned above had 2 losses, regardless of schedule.

that's single elimination.

bottom line, regardless of SOS, big name "traditional" schools always get consideration over the lesser established BCS schools.  it's a popularity contest based on perception which is not always correct (i.e. SEC is always tougher than any other conference), and not based on which team is actually better.

a playoff system between the 6 BCS conference champions and 2 wild cards would solve some of that problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,903
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/09/2006

This will go down as the wildest season of college football  to date, and hopefully will start to drum up some real support for a playoff system!  (Aka root for Boston College and Kansas)

I disagree.  This kind of season PROVES that the regular season is a playoff.  It's not single-elimination (like March Madness), but it shows how important it is to not only win games, but to have a strong schedule as well.

Trust me, I used to advocate a playoff.  Now I'm not so sure.

it IS single elimination for some teams, but not others.

1-loss Oklahoma, LSU, Florida, OSU, USC, Michigan, etc. would all get consideration for a NC bid if there were only 1 undefeated team.  they might also get consideration over some undefeated teams.

but a 1-loss USF or Boston College or Kansas or Missouri would NOT get consideration unless all the teams mentioned above had 2 losses, regardless of schedule.

that's single elimination.

bottom line, regardless of SOS, big name "traditional" schools always get consideration over the lesser established BCS schools.  it's a popularity contest based on perception which is not always correct (i.e. SEC is always tougher than any other conference), and not based on which team is actually better.

a playoff system between the 6 BCS conference champions and 2 wild cards would solve some of that problem.

Well put Comrade... there are two tournaments being played right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,013
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/15/2003

bottom line, regardless of SOS, big name "traditional" schools always get consideration over the lesser established BCS schools.  it's a popularity contest based on perception which is not always correct (i.e. SEC is always tougher than any other conference), and not based on which team is actually better.

a playoff system between the 6 BCS conference champions and 2 wild cards would solve some of that problem.

A playoff system like the one you mention might be better, but it would not eliminate the politics of the game.  Who gets the 2 wild card spots???

USF is definitley in a better position that is was before joining the Big East.  

Getting to #2 this year and remaining competetive gives us credibility in the future.  

If we schedule agressively like we've done this year and go undefeated, we improve our chances at an NC, but not guarnateed one.  Look at Auburn a few years ago, Yes an undefeated SEC left out of the NC game.

If we were in C-USA we would never have a shot.  Look at Tulane and Boise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,249
  • Reputation:   341
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/09/2007

there are two tournaments being played right now.

exactly.  Oklahoma, OSU, LSU, USC, Michigan, Florida, etc. are playing in March Madness.

USF, Mizzou, Kansas, Cinci, BC, Kentucky, Virginia are playing in the NIT.

it doesnt matter how hard or soft the schedule is (look at OSU), "big name" teams are allowed a mistake, while "no name" schools have to play PERFECT football all 12-13 games to even get consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,903
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/09/2006

there are two tournaments being played right now.

exactly.   Oklahoma, OSU, LSU, USC, Michigan, Florida, etc. are playing in March Madness.

USF, Mizzou, Kansas, Cinci, BC, Kentucky, Virginia are playing in the NIT.

it doesnt matter how hard or soft the schedule is (look at OSU), "big name" teams are allowed a mistake, while "no name" schools have to play PERFECT football all 12-13 games to even get consideration.

Makes you sick doesn't it? I know it makes me sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are two tournaments being played right now.

exactly.  Oklahoma, OSU, LSU, USC, Michigan, Florida, etc. are playing in March Madness.

USF, Mizzou, Kansas, Cinci, BC, Kentucky, Virginia are playing in the NIT.

it doesnt matter how hard or soft the schedule is (look at OSU), "big name" teams are allowed a mistake, while "no name" schools have to play PERFECT football all 12-13 games to even get consideration.

Makes you sick doesn't it? I know it makes me sick.

FWIW: The guys on GameDay predicted USF will only drop to 9 or 10 in the BCS after the loss... which means USF isn't really as far out of it as you guys are thinking.

Sure, we drop behind some other 1-loss teams, but that is because our loss is more recent than theirs...

Michigan is a "big name" and they were dropped like a rock... USC lost to Stanford and is outside the Top 10.  I think you guys are blowing it out of proportion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.